Cited by 6Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

Improving deep models of protein-coding potential with a Fourier-transform architecture and machine translation task

Open access
Valencia, Joseph D., Hendrix, David A.·2023·PLOS Computational Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Ribosomes are information-processing macromolecular machines that integrate complex sequence patterns in messenger RNA (mRNA) transcripts to synthesize proteins. Studies of the sequence features that distinguish mRNAs from long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) may yield insight into the information that directs and regulates translation. Computational methods for calculating protein-coding potential are important for distinguishing mRNAs from lncRNAs during genome annotation, but most machine learning methods for this task rely on previously known rules to define features. Sequence-to-sequence (seq2seq) models, particularly ones using transformer networks, have proven capable of learning complex grammatical relationships between words to perform natural language translation. Seeking to leverage these advancements in the biological domain, we present a seq2seq formulation for predicting protein-coding potential with deep neural networks and demonstrate that simultaneously learning translation from RNA to protein improves classification performance relative to a classification-only training objective. Inspired by classical signal processing methods for gene discovery and Fourier-based image-processing neural networks, we introduce LocalFilterNet (LFNet). LFNet is a network architecture with an inductive bias for modeling the three-nucleotide periodicity apparent in coding sequences. We incorporate LFNet within an encoder-decoder framework to test whether the translation task improves the classification of transcripts and the interpretation of their sequence features. We use the resulting model to compute nucleotide-resolution importance scores, revealing sequence patterns that could assist the cellular machinery in distinguishing mRNAs and lncRNAs. Finally, we develop a novel approach for estimating mutation effects from Integrated Gradients, a backpropagation-based feature attribution, and characterize the difficulty of efficient approximations in this setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011526

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Valencia, J. D., & Hendrix, D. A.
Affiliations
Oregon State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hendrix, David A.
Venue
PLOS Computational Biology
Published
2023-10-12
Volume
19
Issue
10
Pages
e1011526
ISSN
  • 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7358
OpenAlex
W4387568691
Cited by
6
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM145986)
  • EECS Outstanding Scholar program at Oregon State University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein-coding potential, sequence-to-sequence models, encoder-decoder architecture, feature attribution, integrated gradients, genome annotation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review