Molecular dynamics simulations of human cohesin subunits identify DNA binding sites and their potential roles in DNA loop extrusion
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The SMC complex cohesin mediates interphase chromatin structural formation in eukaryotic cells through DNA loop extrusion. Here, we sought to investigate its mechanism using molecular dynamics simulations. To achieve this, we first constructed the amino-acid-residue-resolution structural models of the cohesin subunits, SMC1, SMC3, STAG1, and NIPBL. By simulating these subunits with double-stranded DNA molecules, we predicted DNA binding patches on each subunit and quantified the affinities of these patches to DNA using their dissociation rate constants as a proxy. Then, we constructed the structural model of the whole cohesin complex and mapped the predicted high-affinity DNA binding patches on the structure. From the spatial relations of the predicted patches, we identified that multiple patches on the SMC1, SMC3, STAG1, and NIPBL subunits form a DNA clamping patch group. The simulations of the whole complex with double-stranded DNA molecules suggest that this patch group facilitates DNA bending and helps capture a DNA segment in the cohesin ring formed by the SMC1 and SMC3 subunits. In previous studies, these have been identified as critical steps in DNA loop extrusion. Therefore, this study provides experimentally testable predictions of DNA binding sites implicated in previously proposed DNA loop extrusion mechanisms and highlights the essential roles of the accessory subunits STAG1 and NIPBL in the mechanism.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Cohesin mediates transcriptional insulation by CCCTC-binding factor
Wendt, K. S., Yoshida, K., Itoh, T., Bando, M., Koch, B., Schirghuber, E., Tsutsumi, S., Nagae, G., Ishihara, K., Mishiro, T., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06634 · Cited by 1,193 · see citing works
Wutz, G., Várnai, C., Nagasaka, K., Cisneros, D. A., Stocsits, R. R., Tang, W., Schoenfelder, S., Jessberger, G., Muhar, M., Hossain, M. J., et al. (2017) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201798004 · Cited by 864 · see citing works
DNA loop extrusion by human cohesin
Davidson, I. F., Bauer, B., Goetz, D., Tang, W., Wutz, G., & Peters, J.-M. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaz3418 · Cited by 863 · see citing works
Human cohesin compacts DNA by loop extrusion
Kim, Y., Shi, Z., Zhang, H., Finkelstein, I. J., & Yu, H. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaz4475 · Cited by 701 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Gu, C., Takada, S., Brandani, G. B., & Terakawa, T.
- Affiliations
- Kyoto University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Terakawa, Tsuyoshi
- Venue
- PLOS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2025-04-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e1012493
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- PMC
- PMC11970657
- OpenAlex
- W4409157057
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Kyoto University
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (20H0593, 21H02441, 24K01991, 20K06587, 24H00883)
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technolog (JPMXP1020230119)
- Kyoto University Foundation
- Takeda Science Foundation
- Shimazu Science Foundatio
- Inamori Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Keywords
- cohesin, DNA loop extrusion, SMC1A, SMC3, STAG1, NIPBL, DNA binding sites, DNA bending, cohesin ring, chromatin structure, DNA binding affinity, dissociation rate constant, structural model
- MeSH terms
- Cohesins, Structural Maintenance of Chromosome Protein 1, Binding Sites, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone, DNA, Humans, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Protein Binding, Cell Cycle Proteins, Protein Subunits, Molecular Dynamics Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review