Assessing variant effect predictors and disease mechanisms in intrinsically disordered proteins
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are central to diverse cellular processes but present unique challenges for interpreting genetic variants implicated in human disease. Unlike structured protein domains, IDRs lack stable three-dimensional conformations and are often involved in regulation through transient interactions and post-translational modifications. These features can affect both the distribution of pathogenic variants and the performance of computational tools used to predict their effects. Here, we systematically assessed the distribution of pathogenic vs benign missense variants across disordered, intermediate, and structured protein regions in the human proteome. Pathogenic variants were notably depleted in IDRs yet were associated with distinct molecular mechanisms, particularly dominant gain- and loss-of-function effects. We evaluated 33 variant effect predictors (VEPs), revealing widespread reductions in sensitivity for pathogenic variants in IDRs, despite high AUROC scores driven by accurate benign variant predictions. We also observed substantial discordance among VEP classifications in disordered regions, underscoring the need for region-aware thresholds and disorder-informed prediction strategies. Incorporating features reflective of IDR biology, such as transient interaction motifs and modification sites, may enhance the accuracy and interpretability of future tools.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Richards, S., Aziz, N., Bale, S., Bick, D., Das, S., Gastier-Foster, J., Grody, W. W., Hegde, M., Lyon, E., Spector, E., et al. (2015) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.2015.30 · Cited by 32,594 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…is preferable to clinically classified benign variants because it reduces circularity: many VEPs incorporate allele frequency information, which is often used to label clinical benign variants [58], creating a risk of inflated performance due to overlap between training and evaluation data.”
Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome
Tunyasuvunakool, K., Adler, J., Wu, Z., Green, T., Zielinski, M., Žídek, A., Bridgland, A., Cowie, A., Meyer, C., Laydon, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · Cited by 3,025 · see citing works
Pejaver, V., Byrne, A. B., Feng, B.-J., Pagel, K. A., Mooney, S. D., Karchin, R., O’Donnell-Luria, A., Harrison, S. M., Tavtigian, S. V., Greenblatt, M. S., et al. (2022) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.10.013 · Cited by 589 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Note that these are not meant to be thresholds for making clinical classifications; far stricter thresholds would be required for this [55].”
Regional missense constraint improves variant deleteriousness prediction
Samocha, K. E., Kosmicki, J. A., Karczewski, K. J., O’Donnell-Luria, A. H., Pierce-Hoffman, E., MacArthur, D. G., Neale, B. M., & Daly, M. J. (2017) · doi:10.1101/148353 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
AlphaFold2: A Role for Disordered Protein/Region Prediction?
Wilson, C. J., Choy, W.-Y., & Karttunen, M. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23094591 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Conte, A. D., Mehdiabadi, M., Bouhraoua, A., Miguel Monzon, A., Tosatto, S. C. E., & Piovesan, D. (2023) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26582 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Badonyi, M., & Marsh, J. A. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-63234-3 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“For example, low-con fi dence AlphaFold predictions often coincide with intrinsically disordered regions, where missense mutations are less likely to destabilise the folded structure and, by extension, less likely to act via a canonical LOF mechanism 101 .”
Self-citationProtein language model identifies disordered, conserved motifs implicated in phase separation
Zhang, Y., Zheng, J., & Zhang, B. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.105309 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fawzy, M., & Marsh, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Marsh, Joseph A.
- ORCID
- Marsh, Joseph A.
- Venue
- PLOS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2025-08-19
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e1013400
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- PMC
- PMC12377588
- OpenAlex
- W4413323273
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 10.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2025-08-25)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- European Research Council (101001169)
- Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00035/9)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- intrinsically disordered regions, variant effect predictors, variant pathogenicity prediction, gain-of-function mutations, loss-of-function mutations, protein disorder, post-translational modification, transient protein interactions, disease mechanisms
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Protein Conformation, Genetic Variation, Computational Biology, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Mutation, Missense, Proteome, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review