The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Highly Variable Rates of Genome Rearrangements between Hemiascomycetous Yeast Lineages
Open accessAbstract
Hemiascomycete yeasts cover an evolutionary span comparable to that of the entire phylum of chordates. Since this group currently contains the largest number of complete genome sequences it presents unique opportunities to understand the evolution of genome organization in eukaryotes. We inferred rates of genome instability on all branches of a phylogenetic tree for 11 species and calculated species-specific rates of genome rearrangements. We characterized all inversion events that occurred within synteny blocks between six representatives of the different lineages. We show that the rates of macro- and microrearrangements of gene order are correlated within individual lineages but are highly variable across different lineages. The most unstable genomes correspond to the pathogenic yeasts Candida albicans and Candida glabrata. Chromosomal maps have been intensively shuffled by numerous interchromosomal rearrangements, even between species that have retained a very high physical fraction of their genomes within small synteny blocks. Despite this intensive reshuffling of gene positions, essential genes, which cluster in low recombination regions in the genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, tend to remain syntenic during evolution. This work reveals that the high plasticity of eukaryotic genomes results from rearrangement rates that vary between lineages but also at different evolutionary times of a given lineage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The C. glabrata genome displays robust synteny with the genome of the non-pathogenic yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and synteny blocks were found to be present in 88% of the genome of these two yeasts [17,22].”
From Candida glabrata: A Lot More Than Meets the Eye (2019) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PHYLIP-Phylogeny inference package (Version 3.2)
Felsenstein, J. (1989) · Cladistics · Cited by 17,682
Nonlinear programming: theory and algorithms
(1993) · Computers & Operations Research · doi:10.1016/0305-0548(93)90042-h · Cited by 5,803
Goffeau, A., Barrell, B. G., Bussey, H., Davis, R. W., Dujon, B., Feldmann, H., Galibert, F., Hoheisel, J. D., Jacq, C., Johnston, M., et al. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5287.546 · Cited by 4,423
Self-citationTREE-PUZZLE: maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis using quartets and parallel computing
Schmidt, H. A., Strimmer, K., Vingron, M., & von Haeseler, A. (2002) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.3.502 · Cited by 2,512
Jaillon, O., Aury, J.-M., Brunet, F., Petit, J.-L., Stange-Thomann, N., Mauceli, E., Bouneau, L., Fischer, C., Ozouf-Costaz, C., Bernot, A., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03025 · Cited by 1,966
Self-citation[5] Rapid and sensitive sequence comparison with FASTP and FASTA
Pearson, W. R. (1990) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/0076-6879(90)83007-v · Cited by 1,934
Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome
Wolfe, K. H., & Shields, D. C. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/42711 · Cited by 1,785
Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements
Kellis, M., Patterson, N. J., Endrizzi, M. G., Birren, B. W., & Lander, E. S. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01644 · Cited by 1,751
Dujon, B., Sherman, D., Fischer, G., Durrens, P., Casaregola, S., Lafontaine, I., de Montigny, J., Marck, C., Neuvéglise, C., Talla, E., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02579 · Cited by 1,623
Self-citationProof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Kellis, M., Birren, B. W., & Lander, E. S. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02424 · Cited by 1,500
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–104 of 104
Albanaz, A. T. S., Carrington, M., Frolov, A. O., Ganyukova, A. I., Gerasimov, E. S., Kostygov, A. Y., Lukeš, J., Malysheva, M. N., Votýpka, J., Zakharova, A. A., et al. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.24002930
Albanaz, A. T. S., Carrington, M., Frolov, A. O., Ganyukova, A. I., Gerasimov, E. S., Kostygov, A. Y., Lukeš, J., Malysheva, M. N., Votýpka, J., Zakharova, A. A., et al. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.24002924
Etude des mécanismes évolutifs perturbant l’organisation des gènes dans les génomes de vertébrés
Berthelot, C. (2012) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/69479c04z83b5z4f98zbdefz33141a932dce
Impact phénotypique des réarrangements chromosomiques et évolution des génomes de levures
Fleiss, A. (2018) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/ef380bd2z14d5z4771za3e2z82b040f5da53
Metadata
- Authors
- Fischer, G., Rocha, E. P. C., Brunet, F., Vergassola, M., & Dujon, B.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- École Normale Supérieure de Lyon (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Fischer, Gilles
- Venue
- PLoS Genetics
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2006-03-10
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e32
- ISSN
- 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7404
- PMC
- PMC1391921
- OpenAlex
- W1982555149
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 6.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
- Institut Universitaire de France
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
- Keywords
- genome rearrangement, hemiascomycetous yeasts, genomic instability, chromosomal inversions, synteny, interchromosomal rearrangements, Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, essential genes, gene order evolution, genome plasticity, recombination rate
- MeSH terms
- Candida albicans, Chromosome Mapping, Genes, Fungal, Phylogeny, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Species Specificity, Models, Statistical, Chromosomes, Fungal, Genome, Bacterial, Genome, Fungal, Evolution, Molecular, Candida glabrata
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
