The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transcription Initiation Activity Sets Replication Origin Efficiency in Mammalian Cells
Open accessAbstract
Genomic mapping of DNA replication origins (ORIs) in mammals provides a powerful means for understanding the regulatory complexity of our genome. Here we combine a genome-wide approach to identify preferential sites of DNA replication initiation at 0.4% of the mouse genome with detailed molecular analysis at distinct classes of ORIs according to their location relative to the genes. Our study reveals that 85% of the replication initiation sites in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells are associated with transcriptional units. Nearly half of the identified ORIs map at promoter regions and, interestingly, ORI density strongly correlates with promoter density, reflecting the coordinated organisation of replication and transcription in the mouse genome. Detailed analysis of ORI activity showed that CpG island promoter-ORIs are the most efficient ORIs in ES cells and both ORI specification and firing efficiency are maintained across cell types. Remarkably, the distribution of replication initiation sites at promoter-ORIs exactly parallels that of transcription start sites (TSS), suggesting a co-evolution of the regulatory regions driving replication and transcription. Moreover, we found that promoter-ORIs are significantly enriched in CAGE tags derived from early embryos relative to all promoters. This association implies that transcription initiation early in development sets the probability of ORI activation, unveiling a new hallmark in ORI efficiency regulation in mammalian cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The sequence of the human genome
Venter, J. C., Adams, M. D., Myers, E. W., Li, P. W., Mural, R. J., Sutton, G. G., Smith, H. O., Yandell, M., Evans, C. A., Holt, R. A., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058040 · Cited by 13,909
Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome
Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01262 · Cited by 7,187
High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome
Barski, A., Cuddapah, S., Cui, K., Roh, T.-Y., Schones, D. E., Wang, Z., Wei, G., Chepelev, I., & Zhao, K. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.009 · Cited by 6,845
A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells
Bernstein, B. E., Mikkelsen, T. S., Xie, X., Kamal, M., Huebert, D. J., Cuff, J., Fry, B., Meissner, A., Wernig, M., Plath, K., et al. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.041 · Cited by 5,361
Genome-wide analysis of mammalian promoter architecture and evolution
Carninci, P., Sandelin, A., Lenhard, B., Katayama, S., Shimokawa, K., Ponjavic, J., Semple, C. A. M., Taylor, M. S., Engström, P. G., Frith, M. C., et al. (2006) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1789 · Cited by 1,350
Initiation of DNA replication at CpG islands in mammalian chromosomes
Delgado, S., Gómez, M., Bird, A., & Antequera, F. (1998) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/17.8.2426 · Cited by 242
Self-citation
Cited by
CpG islands and the regulation of transcription
Deaton, A. M., & Bird, A. (2011) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.2037511 · Cited by 3,187
R-Loop Formation Is a Distinctive Characteristic of Unmethylated Human CpG Island Promoters
Ginno, P. A., Lott, P. L., Christensen, H. C., Korf, I., & Chédin, F. (2012) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.017 · Cited by 910
DNA replication origin activation in space and time
Fragkos, M., Ganier, O., Coulombe, P., & Méchali, M. (2015) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm4002 · Cited by 543
Eukaryotic Chromosome DNA Replication: Where, When, and How?
Masai, H., Matsumoto, S., You, Z., Yoshizawa-Sugata, N., & Oda, M. (2010) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.052308.103205 · Cited by 498
Besnard, E., Babled, A., Lapasset, L., Milhavet, O., Parrinello, H., Dantec, C., Marin, J.-M., & Lemaitre, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2339 · Cited by 440
Metadata
- Authors
- Sequeira-Mendes, J., Díaz-Uriarte, R., Apedaile, A., Huntley, D., Brockdorff, N., & Gómez, M.
- Venue
- PLoS Genetics
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2009-04-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e1000446
- ISSN
- 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7404
- OpenAlex
- W2000384908
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 9.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transcription Initiation Activity Sets Replication Origin Efficiency in Mammalian Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000446
- The paper
- Sequeira-Mendes, J., Díaz-Uriarte, R., Apedaile, A., Huntley, D., Brockdorff, N., & Gómez, M. (2009). Transcription Initiation Activity Sets Replication Origin Efficiency in Mammalian Cells. PLoS Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000446
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.