The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rapid and Accurate Multiple Testing Correction and Power Estimation for Millions of Correlated Markers
Open accessAbstract
With the development of high-throughput sequencing and genotyping technologies, the number of markers collected in genetic association studies is growing rapidly, increasing the importance of methods for correcting for multiple hypothesis testing. The permutation test is widely considered the gold standard for accurate multiple testing correction, but it is often computationally impractical for these large datasets. Recently, several studies proposed efficient alternative approaches to the permutation test based on the multivariate normal distribution (MVN). However, they cannot accurately correct for multiple testing in genome-wide association studies for two reasons. First, these methods require partitioning of the genome into many disjoint blocks and ignore all correlations between markers from different blocks. Second, the true null distribution of the test statistic often fails to follow the asymptotic distribution at the tails of the distribution. We propose an accurate and efficient method for multiple testing correction in genome-wide association studies--SLIDE. Our method accounts for all correlation within a sliding window and corrects for the departure of the true null distribution of the statistic from the asymptotic distribution. In simulations using the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium data, the error rate of SLIDE's corrected p-values is more than 20 times smaller than the error rate of the previous MVN-based methods' corrected p-values, while SLIDE is orders of magnitude faster than the permutation test and other competing methods. We also extend the MVN framework to the problem of estimating the statistical power of an association study with correlated markers and propose an efficient and accurate power estimation method SLIP. SLIP and SLIDE are available at http://slide.cs.ucla.edu.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical significance for genomewide studies
Storey, J. D., & Tibshirani, R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1530509100 · Cited by 9,692
A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs
The International HapMap Consortium (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06258 · Cited by 4,438
Genomic Control for Association Studies
Devlin, B., & Roeder, K. (1999) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00997.x · Cited by 3,162 · cited 1×
“Theoretically, this is due to the fact that the allelic and genotypic test statistics differ only by their variance [44].”
A new multipoint method for genome-wide association studies by imputation of genotypes
Marchini, J., Howie, B., Myers, S., McVean, G., & Donnelly, P. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng2088 · Cited by 2,609
Adjusting multiple testing in multilocus analyses using the eigenvalues of a correlation matrix
Li, J., & Ji, L. (2005) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800717 · Cited by 1,458
Numerical Computation of Multivariate Normal Probabilities
Genz, A. (1992) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.1992.10477010 · Cited by 1,020
Estimation of significance thresholds for genomewide association scans
Dudbridge, F., & Gusnanto, A. (2008) · Genetic Epidemiology · doi:10.1002/gepi.20297 · Cited by 703
A simple correction for multiple comparisons in interval mapping genome scans
Cheverud, J. M. (2001) · Heredity · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00901.x · Cited by 421
Cited by
Integrative approaches for large-scale transcriptome-wide association studies
Gusev, A., Ko, A., Shi, H., Bhatia, G., Chung, W., Penninx, B. W. J. H., Jansen, R., de Geus, E. J. C., Boomsma, D. I., Wright, F. A., et al. (2016) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3506 · Cited by 2,479
… and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns
Harvey, C. R., Liu, Y., & Zhu, H. (2016) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhv059 · Cited by 2,119
Li, M.-X., Yeung, J. M. Y., Cherny, S. S., & Sham, P. C. (2012) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00439-011-1118-2 · Cited by 962
Colocalization of GWAS and eQTL Signals Detects Target Genes
Hormozdiari, F., van de Bunt, M., Segrè, A. V., Li, X., Joo, J. W. J., Bilow, M., Sul, J. H., Sankararaman, S., Pasaniuc, B., & Eskin, E. (2016) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.10.003 · Cited by 697
Self-citationHan, B., & Eskin, E. (2011) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.04.014 · Cited by 680
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Han, B., Kang, H. M., & Eskin, E.
- Venue
- PLoS Genetics
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2009-04-17
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e1000456
- ISSN
- 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7404
- OpenAlex
- W2018617521
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 7.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid and Accurate Multiple Testing Correction and Power Estimation for Millions of Correlated Markers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000456
- The paper
- Han, B., Kang, H. M., & Eskin, E. (2009). Rapid and Accurate Multiple Testing Correction and Power Estimation for Millions of Correlated Markers. PLoS Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000456
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.