Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,040

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genomic Analysis of the Necrotrophic Fungal Pathogens Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Botrytis cinerea

Open access
Amselem, Joelle, Cuomo, Christina A., van Kan, Jan A. L., Viaud, Muriel, Benito, Ernesto P., Couloux, Arnaud, Coutinho, Pedro M., de Vries, Ronald P., Dyer, Paul S., Fillinger, Sabine, Fournier, Elisabeth, Gout, Lilian, Hahn, Matthias, Kohn, Linda, Lapalu, Nicolas, Plummer, Kim M., Pradier, Jean-Marc, Quévillon, Emmanuel, Sharon, Amir, Simon, Adeline, ten Have, Arjen, Tudzynski, Bettina, Tudzynski, Paul, Wincker, Patrick, Andrew, Marion, Anthouard, Véronique, Beever, Ross E., Beffa, Rolland, Benoit, Isabelle, Bouzid, Ourdia, Brault, Baptiste, Chen, Zehua, Choquer, Mathias, Collémare, Jérome, Cotton, Pascale, Danchin, Etienne G., Da Silva, Corinne, Gautier, Angélique, Giraud, Corinne, Giraud, Tatiana, Gonzalez, Celedonio, Grossetete, Sandrine, Güldener, Ulrich, Henrissat, Bernard, Howlett, Barbara J., Kodira, Chinnappa, Kretschmer, Matthias, Lappartient, Anne, Leroch, Michaela, Levis, Caroline, Mauceli, Evan, Neuvéglise, Cécile, Oeser, Birgitt, Pearson, Matthew, Poulain, Julie, Poussereau, Nathalie, Quesneville, Hadi, Rascle, Christine, Schumacher, Julia, Ségurens, Béatrice, Sexton, Adrienne, Silva, Evelyn, Sirven, Catherine, Soanes, Darren M., Talbot, Nicholas J., Templeton, Matt, Yandava, Chandri, Yarden, Oded, Zeng, Qiandong, Rollins, Jeffrey A., Lebrun, Marc-Henri, Dickman, Marty·2011·PLoS Genetics

Abstract

Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Botrytis cinerea are closely related necrotrophic plant pathogenic fungi notable for their wide host ranges and environmental persistence. These attributes have made these species models for understanding the complexity of necrotrophic, broad host-range pathogenicity. Despite their similarities, the two species differ in mating behaviour and the ability to produce asexual spores. We have sequenced the genomes of one strain of S. sclerotiorum and two strains of B. cinerea. The comparative analysis of these genomes relative to one another and to other sequenced fungal genomes is provided here. Their 38-39 Mb genomes include 11,860-14,270 predicted genes, which share 83% amino acid identity on average between the two species. We have mapped the S. sclerotiorum assembly to 16 chromosomes and found large-scale co-linearity with the B. cinerea genomes. Seven percent of the S. sclerotiorum genome comprises transposable elements compared to <1% of B. cinerea. The arsenal of genes associated with necrotrophic processes is similar between the species, including genes involved in plant cell wall degradation and oxalic acid production. Analysis of secondary metabolism gene clusters revealed an expansion in number and diversity of B. cinerea-specific secondary metabolites relative to S. sclerotiorum. The potential diversity in secondary metabolism might be involved in adaptation to specific ecological niches. Comparative genome analysis revealed the basis of differing sexual mating compatibility systems between S. sclerotiorum and B. cinerea. The organization of the mating-type loci differs, and their structures provide evidence for the evolution of heterothallism from homothallism. These data shed light on the evolutionary and mechanistic bases of the genetically complex traits of necrotrophic pathogenicity and sexual mating. This resource should facilitate the functional studies designed to better understand what makes these fungi such successful and persistent pathogens of agronomic crops.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002230

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 1,040

Metadata

Authors
Amselem, J., Cuomo, C. A., van Kan, J. A. L., Viaud, M., Benito, E. P., Couloux, A., Coutinho, P. M., de Vries, R. P., Dyer, P. S., Fillinger, S., Fournier, E., Gout, L., Hahn, M., Kohn, L., Lapalu, N., Plummer, K. M., Pradier, J.-M., Quévillon, E., Sharon, A., Simon, A., ten Have, A., Tudzynski, B., Tudzynski, P., Wincker, P., Andrew, M., Anthouard, V., Beever, R. E., Beffa, R., Benoit, I., Bouzid, O., Brault, B., Chen, Z., Choquer, M., Collémare, J., Cotton, P., Danchin, E. G., Da Silva, C., Gautier, A., Giraud, C., Giraud, T., Gonzalez, C., Grossetete, S., Güldener, U., Henrissat, B., Howlett, B. J., Kodira, C., Kretschmer, M., Lappartient, A., Leroch, M., Levis, C., Mauceli, E., Neuvéglise, C., Oeser, B., Pearson, M., Poulain, J., Poussereau, N., Quesneville, H., Rascle, C., Schumacher, J., Ségurens, B., Sexton, A., Silva, E., Sirven, C., Soanes, D. M., Talbot, N. J., Templeton, M., Yandava, C., Yarden, O., Zeng, Q., Rollins, J. A., Lebrun, M.-H., & Dickman, M.
Venue
PLoS Genetics
Published
2011-08-18
Volume
7
Issue
8
Pages
e1002230
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W2128606612
Cited by
1,040
References
9
FWCI
74.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomic Analysis of the Necrotrophic Fungal Pathogens Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Botrytis cinerea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002230
The paper
Amselem, J., Cuomo, C. A., van Kan, J. A. L., Viaud, M., Benito, E. P., Couloux, A., Coutinho, P. M., de Vries, R. P., Dyer, P. S., Fillinger, S., Fournier, E., Gout, L., Hahn, M., Kohn, L., Lapalu, N., Plummer, K. M., Pradier, J.-M., Quévillon, E., Sharon, A., . . . Dickman, M. (2011). Genomic Analysis of the Necrotrophic Fungal Pathogens Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Botrytis cinerea. PLoS Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002230

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.