Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 341

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Genome-Wide Meta-Analysis of Six Type 1 Diabetes Cohorts Identifies Multiple Associated Loci

Open access
Bradfield, Jonathan P., Qu, Hui-Qi, Wang, Kai, Zhang, Haitao, Sleiman, Patrick M., Kim, Cecilia E., Mentch, Frank D., Qiu, Haijun, Glessner, Joseph T., Thomas, Kelly A., Frackelton, Edward C., Chiavacci, Rosetta M., Imielinski, Marcin, Monos, Dimitri S., Pandey, Rahul, Bakay, Marina, Grant, Struan F. A., Polychronakos, Constantin, Hakonarson, Hakon·2011·PLoS Genetics

Abstract

Diabetes impacts approximately 200 million people worldwide, of whom approximately 10% are affected by type 1 diabetes (T1D). The application of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) has robustly revealed dozens of genetic contributors to the pathogenesis of T1D, with the most recent meta-analysis identifying in excess of 40 loci. To identify additional genetic loci for T1D susceptibility, we examined associations in the largest meta-analysis to date between the disease and ∼2.54 million SNPs in a combined cohort of 9,934 cases and 16,956 controls. Targeted follow-up of 53 SNPs in 1,120 affected trios uncovered three new loci associated with T1D that reached genome-wide significance. The most significantly associated SNP (rs539514, P = 5.66×10⁻¹¹) resides in an intronic region of the LMO7 (LIM domain only 7) gene on 13q22. The second most significantly associated SNP (rs478222, P = 3.50×10⁻⁹ resides in an intronic region of the EFR3B (protein EFR3 homolog B) gene on 2p23; however, the region of linkage disequilibrium is approximately 800 kb and harbors additional multiple genes, including NCOA1, C2orf79, CENPO, ADCY3, DNAJC27, POMC, and DNMT3A. The third most significantly associated SNP (rs924043, P = 8.06×10⁻⁹ lies in an intergenic region on 6q27, where the region of association is approximately 900 kb and harbors multiple genes including WDR27, C6orf120, PHF10, TCTE3, C6orf208, LOC154449, DLL1, FAM120B, PSMB1, TBP, and PCD2. These latest associated regions add to the growing repertoire of gene networks predisposing to T1D.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002293

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 341

Metadata

Authors
Bradfield, J. P., Qu, H.-Q., Wang, K., Zhang, H., Sleiman, P. M., Kim, C. E., Mentch, F. D., Qiu, H., Glessner, J. T., Thomas, K. A., Frackelton, E. C., Chiavacci, R. M., Imielinski, M., Monos, D. S., Pandey, R., Bakay, M., Grant, S. F. A., Polychronakos, C., & Hakonarson, H.
Venue
PLoS Genetics
Published
2011-09-29
Volume
7
Issue
9
Pages
e1002293
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W2032714982
Cited by
341
References
13
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Genome-Wide Meta-Analysis of Six Type 1 Diabetes Cohorts Identifies Multiple Associated Loci. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002293
The paper
Bradfield, J. P., Qu, H.-Q., Wang, K., Zhang, H., Sleiman, P. M., Kim, C. E., Mentch, F. D., Qiu, H., Glessner, J. T., Thomas, K. A., Frackelton, E. C., Chiavacci, R. M., Imielinski, M., Monos, D. S., Pandey, R., Bakay, M., Grant, S. F. A., Polychronakos, C., & Hakonarson, H. (2011). A Genome-Wide Meta-Analysis of Six Type 1 Diabetes Cohorts Identifies Multiple Associated Loci. PLoS Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002293

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.