Cited by 221Genetic diversity and population structureForensic and Genetic ResearchEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Genomic evidence for island population conversion resolves conflicting theories of polar bear evolution

Open access
Cahill, James A., Green, Richard E., Fulton, Tara L., Stiller, Mathias, Jay, Flora, Ovsyanikov, Nikita, Salamzade, Rauf, St. John, John +3 more·2013·PLoS Genetics

Abstract

Despite extensive genetic analysis, the evolutionary relationship between polar bears (Ursus maritimus) and brown bears (U. arctos) remains unclear. The two most recent comprehensive reports indicate a recent divergence with little subsequent admixture or a much more ancient divergence followed by extensive admixture. At the center of this controversy are the Alaskan ABC Islands brown bears that show evidence of shared ancestry with polar bears. We present an analysis of genome-wide sequence data for seven polar bears, one ABC Islands brown bear, one mainland Alaskan brown bear, and a black bear (U. americanus), plus recently published datasets from other bears. Surprisingly, we find clear evidence for gene flow from polar bears into ABC Islands brown bears but no evidence of gene flow from brown bears into polar bears. Importantly, while polar bears contributed <1% of the autosomal genome of the ABC Islands brown bear, they contributed 6.5% of the X chromosome. The magnitude of sex-biased polar bear ancestry and the clear direction of gene flow suggest a model wherein the enigmatic ABC Island brown bears are the descendants of a polar bear population that was gradually converted into brown bears via male-dominated brown bear admixture. We present a model that reconciles heretofore conflicting genetic observations. We posit that the enigmatic ABC Islands brown bears derive from a population of polar bears likely stranded by the receding ice at the end of the last glacial period. Since then, male brown bear migration onto the island has gradually converted these bears into an admixed population whose phenotype and genotype are principally brown bear, except at mtDNA and X-linked loci. This process of genome erosion and conversion may be a common outcome when climate change or other forces cause a population to become isolated and then overrun by species with which it can hybridize.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003345

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19]Heaton TH, Grady F (2003) The Late Wisconsin vertebrate history of Prince of Wales Island, southeast Alaska. In: Schubert BW, Mead JI, Graham RW, editors. Ice Age Cave Fauna of North America: Indiana University Press. pp. 17–53.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cahill, J. A., Green, R. E., Fulton, T. L., Stiller, M., Jay, F., Ovsyanikov, N., Salamzade, R., St. John, J., Stirling, I., Slatkin, M., & Shapiro, B.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Shapiro, Beth
Venue
PLoS Genetics
Published
2013-03-14
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
e1003345
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W2099428625
Cited by
221
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 5
FWCI
13.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (ARC-09090456)
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM040282, R01‑GM40282)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
polar bear, brown bear, Ursus americanus, hybridization, gene flow, sex-biased admixture, population isolation, last glacial period, genome erosion
MeSH terms
Animals, Ursidae, DNA, Mitochondrial, Biological Evolution, Female, Male, Phylogeny, X Chromosome, Genome, Gene Flow, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review