The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genome-Wide Profiling of Yeast DNA:RNA Hybrid Prone Sites with DRIP-Chip
Open accessAbstract
DNA:RNA hybrid formation is emerging as a significant cause of genome instability in biological systems ranging from bacteria to mammals. Here we describe the genome-wide distribution of DNA:RNA hybrid prone loci in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by DNA:RNA immunoprecipitation (DRIP) followed by hybridization on tiling microarray. These profiles show that DNA:RNA hybrids preferentially accumulated at rDNA, Ty1 and Ty2 transposons, telomeric repeat regions and a subset of open reading frames (ORFs). The latter are generally highly transcribed and have high GC content. Interestingly, significant DNA:RNA hybrid enrichment was also detected at genes associated with antisense transcripts. The expression of antisense-associated genes was also significantly altered upon overexpression of RNase H, which degrades the RNA in hybrids. Finally, we uncover mutant-specific differences in the DRIP profiles of a Sen1 helicase mutant, RNase H deletion mutant and Hpr1 THO complex mutant compared to wild type, suggesting different roles for these proteins in DNA:RNA hybrid biology. Our profiles of DNA:RNA hybrid prone loci provide a resource for understanding the properties of hybrid-forming regions in vivo, extend our knowledge of hybrid-mitigating enzymes, and contribute to models of antisense-mediated gene regulation. A summary of this paper was presented at the 26th International Conference on Yeast Genetics and Molecular Biology, August 2013.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Somatic SF3B1 Mutation in Myelodysplasia with Ring Sideroblasts
Papaemmanuil, E., Cazzola, M., Boultwood, J., Malcovati, L., Vyas, P., Bowen, D., Pellagatti, A., Wainscoat, J. S., Hellstrom-Lindberg, E., Gambacorti-Passerini, C., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1103283 · Cited by 1,222
Cited by
Skourti-Stathaki, K., & Proudfoot, N. J. (2014) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.242990.114 · Cited by 532
Cristini, A., Groh, M., Kristiansen, M. S., & Gromak, N. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.025 · Cited by 423
Functions of Replication Protein A as a Sensor of R Loops and a Regulator of RNaseH1
Nguyen, H. D., Yadav, T., Giri, S., Saez, B., Graubert, T. A., & Zou, L. (2017) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.01.029 · Cited by 267
Introns Protect Eukaryotic Genomes from Transcription-Associated Genetic Instability
Bonnet, A., Grosso, A. R., Elkaoutari, A., Coleno, E., Presle, A., Sridhara, S. C., Janbon, G., Géli, V., de Almeida, S. F., & Palancade, B. (2017) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.07.002 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Chan, Y. A., Aristizabal, M. J., Lu, P. Y. T., Luo, Z., Hamza, A., Kobor, M. S., Stirling, P. C., & Hieter, P.
- Venue
- PLoS Genetics
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2014-04-17
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e1004288
- ISSN
- 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7404
- OpenAlex
- W2047123954
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome-Wide Profiling of Yeast DNA:RNA Hybrid Prone Sites with DRIP-Chip. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004288
- The paper
- Chan, Y. A., Aristizabal, M. J., Lu, P. Y. T., Luo, Z., Hamza, A., Kobor, M. S., Stirling, P. C., & Hieter, P. (2014). Genome-Wide Profiling of Yeast DNA:RNA Hybrid Prone Sites with DRIP-Chip. PLoS Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004288
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.