Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 241

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genomic Landscape Survey Identifies SRSF1 as a Key Oncodriver in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Open access
Jiang, Liyan, Huang, Jiaqi, Higgs, Brandon W., Hu, Zhibin, Xiao, Zhan, Yao, Xin, Conley, Sarah, Zhong, Haihong, Liu, Zheng, Brohawn, Philip, Shen, Dong, Wu, Song, Ge, Xiaoxiao, Jiang, Yue, Zhao, Yizhuo, Lou, Yuqing, Morehouse, Chris, Zhu, Wei, Sebastian, Yinong, Czapiga, Meggan, Oganesyan, Vaheh, Fu, Haihua, Niu, Yanjie, Zhang, Wei, Streicher, Katie, Tice, David, Zhao, Heng, Zhu, Meng, Xu, Lin, Herbst, Ronald, Su, Xinying, Gu, Yi, Li, Shyoung, Huang, Lihua, Gu, Jianren, Han, Baohui, Jallal, Bahija, Shen, Hongbing, Yao, Yihong·2016·PLOS Genetics

Abstract

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease with poor survival. A few sequencing studies performed on limited number of samples have revealed potential disease-driving genes in SCLC, however, much still remains unknown, particularly in the Asian patient population. Here we conducted whole exome sequencing (WES) and transcriptomic sequencing of primary tumors from 99 Chinese SCLC patients. Dysregulation of tumor suppressor genes TP53 and RB1 was observed in 82% and 62% of SCLC patients, respectively, and more than half of the SCLC patients (62%) harbored TP53 and RB1 mutation and/or copy number loss. Additionally, Serine/Arginine Splicing Factor 1 (SRSF1) DNA copy number gain and mRNA over-expression was strongly associated with poor survival using both discovery and validation patient cohorts. Functional studies in vitro and in vivo demonstrate that SRSF1 is important for tumorigenicity of SCLC and may play a key role in DNA repair and chemo-sensitivity. These results strongly support SRSF1 as a prognostic biomarker in SCLC and provide a rationale for personalized therapy in SCLC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005895

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 241

Metadata

Authors
Jiang, L., Huang, J., Higgs, B. W., Hu, Z., Xiao, Z., Yao, X., Conley, S., Zhong, H., Liu, Z., Brohawn, P., Shen, D., Wu, S., Ge, X., Jiang, Y., Zhao, Y., Lou, Y., Morehouse, C., Zhu, W., Sebastian, Y., Czapiga, M., Oganesyan, V., Fu, H., Niu, Y., Zhang, W., Streicher, K., Tice, D., Zhao, H., Zhu, M., Xu, L., Herbst, R., Su, X., Gu, Y., Li, S., Huang, L., Gu, J., Han, B., Jallal, B., Shen, H., & Yao, Y.
Venue
PLOS Genetics
Published
2016-04-19
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
e1005895
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W2342358015
Cited by
241
References
4
FWCI
6.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomic Landscape Survey Identifies SRSF1 as a Key Oncodriver in Small Cell Lung Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005895
The paper
Jiang, L., Huang, J., Higgs, B. W., Hu, Z., Xiao, Z., Yao, X., Conley, S., Zhong, H., Liu, Z., Brohawn, P., Shen, D., Wu, S., Ge, X., Jiang, Y., Zhao, Y., Lou, Y., Morehouse, C., Zhu, W., Sebastian, Y., . . . Yao, Y. (2016). Genomic Landscape Survey Identifies SRSF1 as a Key Oncodriver in Small Cell Lung Cancer. PLOS Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005895

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.