Cited by 4Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionMicrobial metabolism and enzyme functionMetalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Methanogenesis marker 16 metalloprotein is the primary coenzyme M synthase in Methanosarcina acetivorans

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

2-mercaptoethanesulfonate (Coenzyme M, CoM) is an organic sulfur-containing cofactor used for hydrocarbon metabolism in archaea and bacteria. In archaea, CoM serves as an alkyl group carrier for enzymes belonging to the alkyl-CoM reductase family, including methyl-CoM reductase, which catalyzes methane formation in methanogens. Two pathways for the biosynthesis of CoM have been identified in methanogenic archaea. The initial steps of these pathways are distinct but the last two reactions, leading up to CoM formation, are universally conserved. The final step is proposed to be mediated by methanogenesis marker metalloprotein 16 (MMP16), a putative sulfurtransferase, that replaces the aldehyde group of sulfoacetaldehyde with a thiol to generate CoM. Based on prior research, assignment of MMP16 as CoM synthase (ComF) is not widely accepted as deletion mutants have been shown to grow without any CoM dependence. Here, we investigate the role of MMP16 in the model methanogen, Methanosarcina acetivorans. We show that a mutant lacking MMP16 has a CoM-dependent growth phenotype and a global transcriptomic profile reflective of CoM-starvation. Additionally, the ∆ MMP16 mutant is a CoM auxotroph in sulfide-free medium. These data reinforce prior claims that MMP16 is a bona fide ComF but point to backup pathway(s) that can conditionally compensate for its absence. We found that L-aspartate semialdehyde sulfurtransferase (L-ASST), catalyzing a sulfurtransferase reaction during homocysteine biosynthesis in methanogens, is potentially involved in genetic compensation of the MMP16 deletion. Even though both L-ASST and MMP16 are members of the COG1900 family, site-directed mutagenesis of conserved cysteine residues implicated in catalysis reveal that the underlying reaction mechanisms may be distinct.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011695

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. CD Taylor, 1974, Coenzyme M, essential for growth of a rumen strain of Methanobacterium ruminantium, J Bacteriol, 120, 974, 10.1128/jb.120.2.974-975.1974 · DOI
  2. H-H Wu, 2022, The pathway for coenzyme M biosynthesis in bacteria, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 119
  3. RH White, 1986, Intermediates in the biosynthesis of coenzyme M (2-mercaptoethanesulfonic acid), Biochemistry, 25, 5304, 10.1021/bi00366a047 · DOI
  4. DE Graham, 2009, Convergent evolution of coenzyme M biosynthesis in the Methanosarcinales: cysteate synthase evolved from an ancestral threonine synthase, Biochem J, 424, 467, 10.1042/BJ20090999 · DOI
  5. BJ Rauch, 2014, Novel proteins for homocysteine biosynthesis in anaerobic microorganisms, Mol Microbiol, 94, 1330, 10.1111/mmi.12832 · DOI
  6. KD Allen, 2015, Homocysteine is biosynthesized from aspartate semialdehyde and hydrogen sulfide in methanogenic archaea, Biochemistry, 54, 3129, 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00118 · DOI
  7. J Perona, 2018, Sulfur assimilation and trafficking in methanogens, 371, 10.1007/978-3-319-69078-0_14 · DOI
  8. RH White, 2019, Identification of an Enzyme Catalyzing the Conversion of Sulfoacetaldehyde to 2-Mercaptoethanesulfonic Acid in Methanogens, Biochemistry, 58, 1958, 10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00176 · DOI
  9. F Sarmiento, 2013, Genome-scale analysis of gene function in the hydrogenotrophic methanogenic archaeon Methanococcus maripaludis, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 110, 4726, 10.1073/pnas.1220225110 · DOI
  10. DE Graham, 2002, Elucidation of methanogenic coenzyme biosyntheses: from spectroscopy to genomics, Nat Prod Rep, 19, 133, 10.1039/b103714p · DOI
  11. C Rinke, 2021, A standardized archaeal taxonomy for the Genome Taxonomy Database, Nat Microbiol, 6, 946, 10.1038/s41564-021-00918-8 · DOI
  12. DH Parks, 2022, GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy, Nucleic Acids Res, 50, 10.1093/nar/gkab776 · DOI · Paper page
  13. SC Leahy, 2010, The genome sequence of the rumen methanogen Methanobrevibacter ruminantium reveals new possibilities for controlling ruminant methane emissions, PLoS One, 5, 10.1371/journal.pone.0008926 · DOI
  14. DD Nayak, 2017, Cas9-mediated genome editing in the methanogenic archaeon Methanosarcina acetivorans, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 114, 2976, 10.1073/pnas.1618596114 · DOI
  15. PA Micheletti, 1991, Isolation of a coenzyme M-auxotrophic mutant and transformation by electroporation in Methanococcus voltae, J Bacteriol, 173, 3414, 10.1128/jb.173.11.3414-3418.1991 · DOI
  16. D Lovley, 1984, Rapidly growing rumen methanogenic organism that synthesizes coenzyme M and has a high affinity for formate, Appl Environ Microbiol, 48, 81, 10.1128/aem.48.1.81-87.1984 · DOI
  17. AM Guss, 2008, New methods for tightly regulated gene expression and highly efficient chromosomal integration of cloned genes for Methanosarcina species, Archaea, 2, 193, 10.1155/2008/534081 · DOI
  18. GL Chadwick, 2024, Physiological and transcriptomic response to methyl-coenzyme M reductase limitation in Methanosarcina acetivorans, Appl Environ Microbiol, 90, 10.1128/aem.02220-23 · DOI
  19. BS Rajagopal, 1986, Investigation of mercaptans, organic sulfides, and inorganic sulfur compounds as sulfur sources for the growth of methanogenic bacteria, Current Microbiology, 14, 137, 10.1007/BF01568365 · DOI
  20. WE Balch, 1979, Methanogens: reevaluation of a unique biological group, Microbiol Rev, 43, 260, 10.1128/mr.43.2.260-296.1979 · DOI
  21. AM Salvi, 2023, Supplementation of Sulfide or Acetate and 2-Mercaptoethane Sulfonate Restores Growth of the Methanosarcina acetivorans ΔhdrABC Deletion Mutant during Methylotrophic Methanogenesis, Microorganisms, 11, 327, 10.3390/microorganisms11020327 · DOI
  22. NS Kadaba, 2008, The high-affinity E. coli methionine ABC transporter: structure and allosteric regulation, Science, 321, 250, 10.1126/science.1157987 · DOI
  23. M Lucas, 2010, Binding of S-methyl-5’-thioadenosine and S-adenosyl-L-methionine to protein MJ0100 triggers an open-to-closed conformational change in its CBS motif pair, J Mol Biol, 396, 800, 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.12.012 · DOI
  24. BE Kemp, 2004, Bateman domains and adenosine derivatives form a binding contract, J Clin Invest, 113, 182, 10.1172/JCI200420846 · DOI
  25. TJ McCorvie, 2014, Inter-domain communication of human cystathionine β-synthase: structural basis of S-adenosyl-L-methionine activation, J Biol Chem, 289, 36018, 10.1074/jbc.M114.610782 · DOI
  26. BJ Rauch, 2016, Efficient Sulfide Assimilation in Methanosarcina acetivorans Is Mediated by the MA1715 Protein, J Bacteriol, 198, 1974, 10.1128/JB.00141-16 · DOI
  27. SY Kim, 2012, Different biosynthetic pathways to fosfomycin in Pseudomonas syringae and Streptomyces species, Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 56, 4175, 10.1128/AAC.06478-11 · DOI
  28. WW Metcalf, 1997, A genetic system for Archaea of the genus Methanosarcina: liposome-mediated transformation and construction of shuttle vectors, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 94, 2626, 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2626 · DOI
  29. KR Sowers, 1993, Disaggregation of Methanosarcina spp. and Growth as Single Cells at Elevated Osmolarity, Appl Environ Microbiol, 59, 3832, 10.1128/aem.59.11.3832-3839.1993 · DOI
  30. AP Arkin, 2018, KBase: The United States Department of Energy Systems Biology Knowledgebase, Nat Biotechnol, 36, 566, 10.1038/nbt.4163 · DOI
  31. D Kim, 2019, Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype, Nat Biotechnol, 37, 907, 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4 · DOI · Paper page
  32. M Pertea, 2015, StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads, Nat Biotechnol, 33, 290, 10.1038/nbt.3122 · DOI
  33. MI Love, 2014, Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2, Genome Biol, 15, 550, 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · DOI · Paper page
  34. T Seemann, 2014, Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation, Bioinformatics, 30, 2068, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153 · DOI
  35. SR Eddy, 2011, Accelerated Profile HMM Searches, PLoS Comput Biol, 7
  36. EF Pettersen, 2004, UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis, J Comput Chem, 25, 1605, 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI
  37. F Sievers, 2018, Clustal Omega for making accurate alignments of many protein sequences, Protein Sci, 27, 135, 10.1002/pro.3290 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Chadwick, G. L., Williams, M. C., Shalvarjian, K. E., & Nayak, D. D.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
  • Chadwick, Grayson L.
  • Nayak, Dipti D.
Venue
PLOS Genetics
Published
2025-05-02
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
e1011695
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W4410027289
Cited by
4
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Kinship Foundation (Searle Scholars Program)
  • Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • David and Lucile Packard Foundation
  • Chan Zuckerberg Initiative
  • Simons Foundation
  • Adolph C. and Mary Sprague Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science, University of California Berkeley
  • National Science Foundation (202299857)
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (T32 GM 132022)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial metabolism and enzyme function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins
Keywords
MMP16, Methanosarcina acetivorans, methanogenic archaea, sulfurtransferase, genetic compensation, transcriptomic response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review