Cited by 1Axon Guidance and Neuronal SignalingNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A dendritic guidance receptor functions in both ligand dependent and independent modes

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The formation of an appropriately shaped dendritic arbor is critical for a neuron to receive information. Dendritic morphogenesis is a dynamic process involving growth, branching, and retraction. How the growth and stabilization of dendrites are coordinated at the molecular level remains a key question in developmental neurobiology. The highly arborized and stereotyped dendritic arbors of the Caenorhabditis elegans PVD neuron are shaped by the transmembrane DMA-1 receptor through its interaction with a tripartite ligand complex consisting of SAX-7/L1CAM, MNR-1/FAM151B, and LECT-2/LECT2. However, receptor null mutants exhibit strongly reduced dendrite outgrowth, whereas ligand null mutants show disordered branch patterns, suggesting a ligand-independent function of the receptor. To test this idea, we identified point mutations in dma-1 that disrupt receptor-ligand binding and introduced corresponding mutations into the endogenous gene. We show that the ligand-free receptor is sufficient to drive robust, disordered dendritic branch formation but results in a complete loss of arbor shape. This disordered outgrowth program utilizes similar downstream effectors as the stereotyped outgrowth program, further arguing that ligand binding is not necessary for outgrowth. Finally, we demonstrate that ligand binding is required to maintain higher-order dendrites after development is complete. Taken together, our findings support a surprising model in which ligand-free and ligand-bound DMA-1 receptors have distinct functions: the ligand-free receptor promotes stochastic outgrowth and branching, whereas the ligand-bound receptor guides stereotyped dendrite morphology by stabilizing arbors at target locations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011942

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. P Valnegri, 2015, Regulation of dendrite morphogenesis by extrinsic cues, Trends Neurosci, 38, 439, 10.1016/j.tins.2015.05.003 · DOI
  2. F Polleux, 2000, Semaphorin 3A is a chemoattractant for cortical apical dendrites, Nature, 404, 567, 10.1038/35007001 · DOI
  3. A Mauss, 2009, Midline signalling systems direct the formation of a neural map by dendritic targeting in the Drosophila motor system, PLoS Biol, 7, 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000200 · DOI
  4. M-P Furrer, 2003, Robo and Frazzled/DCC mediate dendritic guidance at the CNS midline, Nat Neurosci, 6, 223, 10.1038/nn1017 · DOI
  5. WB Grueber, 2010, Self-avoidance and tiling: mechanisms of dendrite and axon spacing, Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 2, 10.1101/cshperspect.a001750 · DOI
  6. SS Millard, 2008, Dscam-mediated repulsion controls tiling and self-avoidance, Curr Opin Neurobiol, 18, 84, 10.1016/j.conb.2008.05.005 · DOI
  7. ME Hughes, 2007, Homophilic Dscam interactions control complex dendrite morphogenesis, Neuron, 54, 417, 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.04.013 · DOI
  8. D Kostadinov, 2015, Protocadherin-dependent dendritic self-avoidance regulates neural connectivity and circuit function, Elife, 4, 10.7554/eLife.08964 · DOI
  9. S Etienne-Manneville, 2002, Rho GTPases in cell biology, Nature, 420, 629, 10.1038/nature01148 · DOI
  10. J Leemhuis, 2004, Rho GTPases and phosphoinositide 3-kinase organize formation of branched dendrites, J Biol Chem, 279, 585, 10.1074/jbc.M307066200 · DOI
  11. KF Tolias, 2007, The Rac1 guanine nucleotide exchange factor Tiam1 mediates EphB receptor-dependent dendritic spine development, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 104, 7265, 10.1073/pnas.0702044104 · DOI
  12. A Albeg, 2011, C. elegans multi-dendritic sensory neurons: morphology and function, Mol Cell Neurosci, 46, 308, 10.1016/j.mcn.2010.10.001 · DOI
  13. CJ Smith, 2010, Time-lapse imaging and cell-specific expression profiling reveal dynamic branching and molecular determinants of a multi-dendritic nociceptor in C. elegans, Dev Biol, 345, 18, 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.05.502 · DOI
  14. W Zou, 2018, A dendritic guidance receptor complex brings together distinct actin regulators to drive efficient F-actin assembly and branching, Dev Cell, 45, 362, 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.04.008 · DOI
  15. Y Salzberg, 2013, Skin-derived cues control arborization of sensory dendrites in Caenorhabditis elegans, Cell, 155, 308, 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.058 · DOI
  16. X Dong, 2013, An extracellular adhesion molecule complex patterns dendritic branching and morphogenesis, Cell, 155, 296, 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.059 · DOI
  17. W Zou, 2016, A multi-protein receptor-ligand complex underlies combinatorial dendrite guidance choices in C. elegans, Elife, 5
  18. CA Díaz-Balzac, 2016, Muscle- and skin-derived cues jointly orchestrate patterning of somatosensory dendrites, Curr Biol, 26, 2379, 10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.008 · DOI
  19. LT Tang, 2019, TIAM-1/GEF can shape somatosensory dendrites independently of its GEF activity by regulating F-actin localization, Elife, 8
  20. CJ Smith, 2013, Sensory neuron fates are distinguished by a transcriptional switch that regulates dendrite branch stabilization, Neuron, 79, 266, 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.05.009 · DOI
  21. B Ding, 2022, Structures reveal a key mechanism of WAVE regulatory complex activation by Rac1 GTPase, Nat Commun, 13, 5444, 10.1038/s41467-022-33174-3 · DOI · Paper page
  22. OW Liu, 2011, The transmembrane LRR protein DMA-1 promotes dendrite branching and growth in C. elegans, Nat Neurosci, 15, 57, 10.1038/nn.2978 · DOI
  23. R Shi, 2024, Stochastic growth and selective stabilization generate stereotyped dendritic arbors, bioRxiv
  24. M Jinek, 2012, A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity, Science, 337, 816, 10.1126/science.1225829 · DOI · Paper page
  25. DJ Dickinson, 2016, CRISPR-based methods for Caenorhabditis elegans genome engineering, Genetics, 202, 885, 10.1534/genetics.115.182162 · DOI
  26. K Eichel, 2022, Endocytosis in the axon initial segment maintains neuronal polarity, Nature, 609, 128, 10.1038/s41586-022-05074-5 · DOI
  27. DA Kramer, 2023, The intrinsically disordered cytoplasmic tail of a dendrite branching receptor uses two distinct mechanisms to regulate the actin cytoskeleton, Elife, 12, 10.7554/eLife.88492 · DOI · Paper page
  28. R Shi, 2021, A two-step actin polymerization mechanism drives dendrite branching, Neural Dev, 16, 3, 10.1186/s13064-021-00154-0 · DOI
  29. GE Ashley, 2021, An expanded auxin-inducible degron toolkit for Caenorhabditis elegans, Genetics, 217, 10.1093/genetics/iyab006 · DOI
  30. S Shree, 2022, Dynamic instability of dendrite tips generates the highly branched morphologies of sensory neurons, Sci Adv, 8, 10.1126/sciadv.abn0080 · DOI
  31. A Palavalli, 2021, Deterministic and stochastic rules of branching govern dendrite morphogenesis of sensory neurons, Curr Biol, 31, 10.1016/j.cub.2020.10.054 · DOI
  32. NJ Ramirez-Suarez, 2023, Convertase-dependent regulation of membrane-tethered and secreted ligands tunes dendrite adhesion, Development, 150
  33. M-P Furrer, 2007, Slit and Robo control the development of dendrites in Drosophila CNS, Development, 134, 3795, 10.1242/dev.02882 · DOI
  34. BJ Matthews, 2011, Dscam1-mediated self-avoidance counters netrin-dependent targeting of dendrites in Drosophila, Curr Biol, 21, 1480, 10.1016/j.cub.2011.07.040 · DOI
  35. N Hoyer, 2018, Ret and substrate-derived TGF-β maverick regulate space-filling dendrite growth in Drosophila sensory neurons, Cell Rep, 24, 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.07.092 · DOI
  36. JC Hao, 2001, C. elegans slit acts in midline, dorsal-ventral, and anterior-posterior guidance via the SAX-3/Robo receptor, Neuron, 32, 25, 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00448-2 · DOI
  37. Z Wang, 2014, UNC-6 (netrin) stabilizes oscillatory clustering of the UNC-40 (DCC) receptor to orient polarity, J Cell Biol, 206, 619, 10.1083/jcb.201405026 · DOI
  38. R Evans, 2021, Protein complex prediction with Alphafold-Multimer, bioRxiv
  39. G Kim, 2025, Easy and accurate protein structure prediction using ColabFold, Nat Protoc, 20, 620, 10.1038/s41596-024-01060-5 · DOI
  40. H Ashkenazy, 2016, ConSurf 2016: an improved methodology to estimate and visualize evolutionary conservation in macromolecules, Nucleic Acids Res, 44, 10.1093/nar/gkw408 · DOI · Paper page
  41. T Stiernagle, 2006, Maintenance of C. elegans, WormBook, 1
  42. GA Dokshin, 2018, Robust genome editing with short single-stranded and long, partially single-stranded DNA donors in Caenorhabditis elegans, Genetics, 210, 781, 10.1534/genetics.118.301532 · DOI
  43. J Schindelin, 2012, Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis, Nat Methods, 9, 676, 10.1038/nmeth.2019 · DOI · Paper page
  44. S Preibisch, 2009, Globally optimal stitching of tiled 3D microscopic image acquisitions, Bioinformatics, 25, 1463, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp184 · DOI · Paper page
  45. C Arshadi, 2021, SNT: a unifying toolbox for quantification of neuronal anatomy, Nat Methods, 18, 374, 10.1038/s41592-021-01105-7 · DOI
  46. X Dong, 2016, Precise regulation of the guidance receptor DMA-1 by KPC-1/Furin instructs dendritic branching decisions, Elife, 5, 10.7554/eLife.11008 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Reddy, A. R., Machera, S. J., Cook, Z. T., Deng, H., Nawrocka, W. I., Özkan, E., & Shen, K.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Shen, Kang
Venue
PLOS Genetics
Published
2025-12-05
Volume
21
Issue
12
Pages
e1011942
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W4417055012
Cited by
1
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Knowledge@UChicago (University of Chicago) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • University of Chicago (cc-by)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (GM007276, NS082208)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
dendrite morphogenesis, dendritic outgrowth, dendritic branching, ligand binding, PVD neuron, Caenorhabditis elegans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review