Cited by 557Parasites and Host InteractionsParasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentChild Nutrition and Water Access

“Rapid-Impact Interventions”: How a Policy of Integrated Control for Africa's Neglected Tropical Diseases Could Benefit the Poor

Open access
Molyneux, David H, Hotez, Peter J, Fenwick, Alan·2005·PLoS Medicine

Abstract

O ver the past two decades there have been signifi cant achievements in the control of a handful of important human tropical infections [1].These achievements include the substantive reductions in the prevalence and incidence of the so-called neglected diseases such as lymphatic fi lariasis, onchocerciasis, guinea worm, leprosy, and trachoma (Box 1) [2].Each of these neglected diseases is a poverty-promoting and often stigmatizing condition occurring primarily in rural areas of low-income countries (Box 2) [3].They are ancient affl ictions, described in the Bible and other ancient texts, which have burdened humanity for millennia [3].But now, as a result of aggressive regional vertical interventions, there is a possibility that some neglected tropical infections could be eventually controlled to the point of elimination in some areas of endemicity [2-8].In the case of guinea worm infection, disease eradication might also soon be possible [9]. Neglected by Policy Makers and DonorsSomewhat surprisingly, policy makers and public health offi cials have largely ignored the extraordinary successes in these vertical programmes for neglected disease control and elimination.We believe that there are two main reasons for this lack of attention.The fi rst is that the international health community, including donors, have given the highest priority to the "big three"-HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis (TB), and malaria-with the result that other infections of poverty garner less attention.The second is that donors and policy makers take a dim view of the overall value of vertical programmes that are not directed at the big three.With regards to the big three, donors, international agencies, nongovernmental development agencies, and governments have responded through focused attention on vertical initiatives by creating UNAIDS (http:⁄⁄www.unaids. org) and within WHO, Stop TB (http:⁄⁄www.stoptb.org)and Roll Back Malaria (http:⁄⁄www.rollbackmalaria.org).These developments stimulated the establishment of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria (http:⁄⁄www.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020336

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is estimated that USD$0.40 per person per year could prevent a majority of the top neglected tropical diseases in Africa.

    “It is estimated that USD$0.40 per person per year could prevent a majority of the top neglected tropical diseases in Africa”

    From Global Burden of Skin Disease: Inequities and Innovations (2017) · cites this paper as [27]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hotez PJ Remme H Buss P Alleyne G Morel C Combating tropical communicable diseases: Workshop report of the disease control priorities project Clin Infec Dis 2004 38 871 878 14999633
  2. Hotez PJ Ottesen E Fenwick A Molyneux DH Pollard AJ Finn A The neglected tropical diseases: The ancient afflictions of stigma and poverty and the prospects for their integrated control and elimination Hot topics in infection and immunity in children III 2006 New York Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers In press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Molyneux, D. H., Hotez, P. J., & Fenwick, A.
Affiliations
  • Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Hotez, Peter J
Venue
PLoS Medicine
Published
2005-10-11
Volume
2
Issue
11
Pages
e336
ISSN
  • 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-1676
OpenAlex
W1981367337
Cited by
557
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 38
FWCI
26.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSTM Online Archive (Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Sabin Vaccine Institute
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Department for International Development
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
Keywords
neglected tropical diseases, integrated disease management, vertical programmes, disease elimination, lymphatic filariasis, onchocerciasis, guinea worm, leprosy, trachoma, poverty, health policy, disease eradication
MeSH terms
Africa, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Cost Control, Goals, Health Policy, Humans, Policy Making, Tropical Medicine, Health Care Costs, Infection Control, Endpoint Determination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review