The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanisms of GII.4 Norovirus Persistence in Human Populations
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Noroviruses are the leading cause of viral acute gastroenteritis in humans, noted for causing epidemic outbreaks in communities, the military, cruise ships, hospitals, and assisted living communities. The evolutionary mechanisms governing the persistence and emergence of new norovirus strains in human populations are unknown. Primarily organized by sequence homology into two major human genogroups defined by multiple genoclusters, the majority of norovirus outbreaks are caused by viruses from the GII.4 genocluster, which was first recognized as the major epidemic strain in the mid-1990s. Previous studies by our laboratory and others indicate that some noroviruses readily infect individuals who carry a gene encoding a functional alpha-1,2-fucosyltransferase (FUT2) and are designated "secretor-positive" to indicate that they express ABH histo-blood group antigens (HBGAs), a highly heterogeneous group of related carbohydrates on mucosal surfaces. Individuals with defects in the FUT2 gene are termed secretor-negative, do not express the appropriate HBGA necessary for docking, and are resistant to Norwalk infection. These data argue that FUT2 and other genes encoding enzymes that regulate processing of the HBGA carbohydrates function as susceptibility alleles. However, secretor-negative individuals can be infected with other norovirus strains, and reinfection with the GII.4 strains is common in human populations. In this article, we analyze molecular mechanisms governing GII.4 epidemiology, susceptibility, and persistence in human populations. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Phylogenetic analyses of the GII.4 capsid sequences suggested an epochal evolution over the last 20 y with periods of stasis followed by rapid evolution of novel epidemic strains. The epidemic strains show a linear relationship in time, whereby serial replacements emerge from the previous cluster. Five major evolutionary clusters were identified, and representative ORF2 capsid genes for each cluster were expressed as virus-like particles (VLPs). Using salivary and carbohydrate-binding assays, we showed that GII.4 VLP-carbohydrate ligand binding patterns have changed over time and include carbohydrates regulated by the human FUT2 and FUT3 pathways, suggesting that strain sensitivity to human susceptibility alleles will vary. Variation in surface-exposed residues and in residues that surround the fucose ligand interaction domain suggests that antigenic drift may promote GII.4 persistence in human populations. Evidence supporting antigenic drift was obtained by measuring the antigenic relatedness of GII.4 VLPs using murine and human sera and demonstrating strain-specific serologic and carbohydrate-binding blockade responses. These data suggest that the GII.4 noroviruses persist by altering their HBGA carbohydrate-binding targets over time, which not only allows for escape from highly penetrant host susceptibility alleles, but simultaneously allows for immune-driven selection in the receptor-binding region to facilitate escape from protective herd immunity. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the surface-exposed carbohydrate ligand binding domain in the norovirus capsid is under heavy immune selection and likely evolves by antigenic drift in the face of human herd immunity. Variation in the capsid carbohydrate-binding domain is tolerated because of the large repertoire of similar, yet distinct HBGA carbohydrate receptors available on mucosal surfaces that could interface with the remodeled architecture of the capsid ligand-binding pocket. The continuing evolution of new replacement strains suggests that, as with influenza viruses, vaccines could be targeted that protect against norovirus infections, and that continued epidemiologic surveillance and reformulations of norovirus vaccines will be essential in the control of future outbreaks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis
Pettersen, E. F., Goddard, T. D., Huang, C. C., Couch, G. S., Greenblatt, D. M., Meng, E. C., & Ferrin, T. E. (2004) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20084 · Cited by 45,828
CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x · Cited by 44,647
MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models
Ronquist, F., & Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180 · Cited by 29,077
MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) Software Version 4.0
Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2007) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msm092 · Cited by 28,730
MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.
Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Ronquist, F. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754 · Cited by 21,937
Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications.
Hastings, W. K. (1970) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · Cited by 15,195
PAUP^* : Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and other methods) 4.0b8
Swofford, D. L. (2001) · Cited by 12,789
Tree View: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers
Page, R. D. M. (1996) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/12.4.357 · Cited by 10,178
Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics
Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195135848.001.0001 · Cited by 8,012
Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination
GREEN, P. J. (1995) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/82.4.711 · Cited by 5,930
Cited by
Proposal for a unified norovirus nomenclature and genotyping
Kroneman, A., Vega, E., Vennema, H., Vinjé, J., White, P. A., Hansman, G., Green, K., Martella, V., Katayama, K., & Koopmans, M. (2013) · Archives of Virology · doi:10.1007/s00705-013-1708-5 · Cited by 573
Rapid Evolution of Pandemic Noroviruses of the GII.4 Lineage
Bull, R. A., Eden, J.-S., Rawlinson, W. D., & White, P. A. (2010) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000831 · Cited by 301
Recombination within the Pandemic Norovirus GII.4 Lineage
Eden, J.-S., Tanaka, M. M., Boni, M. F., Rawlinson, W. D., & White, P. A. (2013) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.03464-12 · Cited by 270
Norovirus pathogenesis: mechanisms of persistence and immune evasion in human populations
Donaldson, E. F., Lindesmith, L. C., Lobue, A. D., & Baric, R. S. (2008) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1600-065x.2008.00680.x · Cited by 255
Self-citationRose, R. D., Buckey, J. C., Zbozinek, T. D., Motivala, S. J., Glenn, D. E., Cartreine, J. A., & Craske, M. G. (2013) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2012.11.003 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Lindesmith, L. C., Donaldson, E. F., LoBue, A. D., Cannon, J. L., Zheng, D.-P., Vinje, J., & Baric, R. S.
- Venue
- PLoS Medicine
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2008-02-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e31
- ISSN
- 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-1676
- OpenAlex
- W2113585031
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 83
- FWCI
- 28.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms of GII.4 Norovirus Persistence in Human Populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050031
- The paper
- Lindesmith, L. C., Donaldson, E. F., LoBue, A. D., Cannon, J. L., Zheng, D.-P., Vinje, J., & Baric, R. S. (2008). Mechanisms of GII.4 Norovirus Persistence in Human Populations. PLoS Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.