Cited by 96Health and Conflict StudiesInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse

Documenting Mortality in Crises: What Keeps Us from Doing Better?

Open access
Checchi, Francesco, Roberts, Les·2008·PLoS Medicine

Abstract

Both authors were involved in some of the surveys

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050146

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Perinatal deaths have received less attention in mortality surveys in humanitarian settings; the focus of mortality reporting has generally been on crude or under 5 mortality, with a lack of reporting of stillbirths, and limited differentiation or identification of the neonatal category as a proportion of under 5 deaths.

    “Perinatal deaths have received less attention in mortality surveys in humanitarian settings; the focus of mortality reporting has generally been on crude or under 5 mortality [14], with a lack of reporting of stillbirths, and limited differentiation or identification of the neonatal category as a proportion of under 5 deaths [15].”

    From Implementation of maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR) in humanitarian settings: insights and experiences of humanitarian health practitioners and global technical expert meeting attendees (2022) · cites this paper as [14]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1992 Famine-affected, refugee, and displaced populations: Recommendations for public health issues MMWR Recomm Rep 41 1 76 1326713
  2. Obermeyer Z Murray CJ Gakidou EE 2007 A half-century of war mortality in 13 countries [presentation] Humanitarian Health Conference; 6–8 September 2007; Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America
  3. [No authors listed] 2004 WHO's African regional office must evolve or die Lancet 364 475 476 15302170
  4. [No authors listed] 2005 Who takes responsibility for Zimbabwe Lancet 366 1138 16198746
  5. World Health Organization 2006 Report of a workshop on tracking health performance and humanitarian outcomes Available: http://www.who.int/hac/events/Trackingworkshop_December05_report.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2008
  6. Checchi F 2007 Could respondent-driven exhaustive case-finding be used for real-time mortality monitoring [presentation]. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters. Survey Conference 2007: Surveying health in complex situations; 4 May 2007; Brussels; Belgium. Available: http://www.cred.be/SurveyConference2007/documents/Conference2007/Checchi.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2008

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Checchi, F., & Roberts, L.
Affiliations
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Checchi, Francesco
Venue
PLoS Medicine
Published
2008-07-01
Volume
5
Issue
7
Pages
e146
ISSN
  • 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-1676
OpenAlex
W1969776737
Cited by
96
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Keywords
mortality surveillance, crisis situations, data quality, underreporting of deaths
MeSH terms
Demography, Documentation, Emergencies, Humans, Mortality, Population Dynamics, Population Surveillance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review