Cited by 93Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Considering Usual Medical Care in Clinical Trial Design

Open access
Dawson, Liza, Zarin, Deborah A., Emanuel, Ezekiel J., Friedman, Lawrence M., Chaudhari, Bimal, Goodman, Steven N.·2009·PLoS Medicine

Abstract

The Policy Forum allows health policy makers around the world to discuss challenges

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000111

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [5]Sackett DL 2006 The Principles behind the tactics of performing therapeutic trials. Clinical Epidemiology: How to Do Clinical Practice Research. 3rd edition Lippincott, Williams, Wilkins
  2. [10]American Medical Association, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, Code of Medical Ethics The use of placebo controls in clinical trials. Available: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/opinion2075.shtml. Accessed 31 August 2009
  3. [11]International Conference on Harmonization Guidance on Control Groups, ICH E10; Available: http://www.ich.org/lob/media/media415.pdf. Accessed 29 August 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dawson, L., Zarin, D. A., Emanuel, E. J., Friedman, L. M., Chaudhari, B., & Goodman, S. N.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Dawson, Liza
Venue
PLoS Medicine
Published
2009-09-29
Volume
6
Issue
9
Pages
e1000111
ISSN
  • 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-1676
OpenAlex
W2139454298
Cited by
93
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Medicine (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
usual care, clinical trial design, health policy
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Research Design, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review