The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Monitoring Progress towards Universal Health Coverage at Country and Global Levels
Open accessAbstract
Universal health coverage (UHC) has been defined as the desired outcome of health system performance whereby all people who need health services (promotion, prevention, treatment, rehabilitation, and palliation) receive them, without undue financial hardship. UHC has two interrelated components: the full spectrum of good-quality, essential health services according to need, and protection from financial hardship, including possible impoverishment, due to out-of-pocket payments for health services. Both components should benefit the entire population. This paper summarizes the findings from 13 country case studies and five technical reviews, which were conducted as part of the development of a global framework for monitoring progress towards UHC. The case studies show the relevance and feasibility of focusing UHC monitoring on two discrete components of health system performance: levels of coverage with health services and financial protection, with a focus on equity. These components link directly to the definition of UHC and measure the direct results of strategies and policies for UHC. The studies also show how UHC monitoring can be fully embedded in often existing, regular overall monitoring of health sector progress and performance. Several methodological and practical issues related to the monitoring of coverage of essential health services, financial protection, and equity, are highlighted. Addressing the gaps in the availability and quality of data required for monitoring progress towards UHC is critical in most countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development
Meara, J. G., Leather, A. J. M., Hagander, L., Alkire, B. C., Alonso, N., Ameh, E. A., Bickler, S. W., Conteh, L., Dare, A. J., Davies, J., et al. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60160-x · Cited by 3,851
Progress on catastrophic health spending in 133 countries: a retrospective observational study
Wagstaff, A., Flores, G., Hsu, J., Smitz, M.-F., Chepynoga, K., Buisman, L. R., van Wilgenburg, K., & Eozenou, P. (2018) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(17)30429-1 · Cited by 1,019
Self-citationLozano, R., Fullman, N., Mumford, J. E., Knight, M., Barthelemy, C. M., Abbafati, C., Abbastabar, H., Abd-Allah, F., Abdollahi, M., Abedi, A., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30750-9 · Cited by 719
Lozano, R., Fullman, N., Abate, D., Abay, S. M., Abbafati, C., Abbasi, N., Abbastabar, H., Abd-Allah, F., Abdela, J., Abdelalim, A., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32281-5 · Cited by 538
Progress on impoverishing health spending in 122 countries: a retrospective observational study
Wagstaff, A., Flores, G., Smitz, M.-F., Hsu, J., Chepynoga, K., & Eozenou, P. (2018) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(17)30486-2 · Cited by 421
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Boerma, T., Eozenou, P., Evans, D., Evans, T., Kieny, M.-P., & Wagstaff, A.
- Venue
- PLoS Medicine
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2014-09-22
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e1001731
- ISSN
- 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-1676
- OpenAlex
- W2068166908
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 54.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monitoring Progress towards Universal Health Coverage at Country and Global Levels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001731
- The paper
- Boerma, T., Eozenou, P., Evans, D., Evans, T., Kieny, M.-P., & Wagstaff, A. (2014). Monitoring Progress towards Universal Health Coverage at Country and Global Levels. PLoS Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001731
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.