The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diet during pregnancy and infancy and risk of allergic or autoimmune disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty about the influence of diet during pregnancy and infancy on a child's immune development. We assessed whether variations in maternal or infant diet can influence risk of allergic or autoimmune disease. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Two authors selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess certainty of findings. We searched Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), Web of Science, Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Literatura Latino Americana em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS) between January 1946 and July 2013 for observational studies and until December 2017 for intervention studies that evaluated the relationship between diet during pregnancy, lactation, or the first year of life and future risk of allergic or autoimmune disease. We identified 260 original studies (964,143 participants) of milk feeding, including 1 intervention trial of breastfeeding promotion, and 173 original studies (542,672 participants) of other maternal or infant dietary exposures, including 80 trials of maternal (n = 26), infant (n = 32), or combined (n = 22) interventions. Risk of bias was high in 125 (48%) milk feeding studies and 44 (25%) studies of other dietary exposures. Evidence from 19 intervention trials suggests that oral supplementation with nonpathogenic micro-organisms (probiotics) during late pregnancy and lactation may reduce risk of eczema (Risk Ratio [RR] 0.78; 95% CI 0.68-0.90; I2 = 61%; Absolute Risk Reduction 44 cases per 1,000; 95% CI 20-64), and 6 trials suggest that fish oil supplementation during pregnancy and lactation may reduce risk of allergic sensitisation to egg (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.90; I2 = 15%; Absolute Risk Reduction 31 cases per 1,000; 95% CI 10-47). GRADE certainty of these findings was moderate. We found weaker support for the hypotheses that breastfeeding promotion reduces risk of eczema during infancy (1 intervention trial), that longer exclusive breastfeeding is associated with reduced type 1 diabetes mellitus (28 observational studies), and that probiotics reduce risk of allergic sensitisation to cow's milk (9 intervention trials), where GRADE certainty of findings was low. We did not find that other dietary exposures-including prebiotic supplements, maternal allergenic food avoidance, and vitamin, mineral, fruit, and vegetable intake-influence risk of allergic or autoimmune disease. For many dietary exposures, data were inconclusive or inconsistent, such that we were unable to exclude the possibility of important beneficial or harmful effects. In this comprehensive systematic review, we were not able to include more recent observational studies or verify data via direct contact with authors, and we did not evaluate measures of food diversity during infancy. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support a relationship between maternal diet and risk of immune-mediated diseases in the child. Maternal probiotic and fish oil supplementation may reduce risk of eczema and allergic sensitisation to food, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dermyshi, E., Wang, Y., Yan, C., Hong, W., Qiu, G., Gong, X., & Zhang, T. (2017) · Neonatology · doi:10.1159/000454668 · Cited by 24,451
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
Guyatt, G., Oxman, A. D., Akl, E. A., Kunz, R., Vist, G., Brozek, J., Norris, S., Falck-Ytter, Y., Glasziou, P., & deBeer, H. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026 · Cited by 10,681
Asher, M. I., Montefort, S., Björkstén, B., Lai, C. K., Strachan, D. P., Weiland, S. K., & Williams, H. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69283-0 · Cited by 4,223
Atopic Dermatitis: Global Epidemiology and Risk Factors
Nutten, S. (2015) · Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism · doi:10.1159/000370220 · Cited by 3,055
Treatment of Childhood Atopic Dermatitis and Economic Burden of Illness in Asia Pacific Countries
Lee, B. W., & Detzel, P. R. (2015) · Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism · doi:10.1159/000370221 · Cited by 1,668
Besselink, M. G., van Santvoort, H. C., Buskens, E., Boermeester, M. A., van Goor, H., Timmerman, H. M., Nieuwenhuijs, V. B., Bollen, T. L., van Ramshorst, B., Witteman, B. J., et al. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60207-x · Cited by 1,367
Greer, F. R., Sicherer, S. H., Burks, A. W., & and the Committee on Nutrition and Section on Allergy and Immunology (2008) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2007-3022 · Cited by 1,114
A Proposed Classification of the Immunological Diseases
McGonagle, D., & McDermott, M. F. (2006) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030297 · Cited by 840
Probiotic use in clinical practice: what are the risks?
Boyle, R. J., Robins-Browne, R. M., & Tang, M. L. (2006) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/83.6.1256 · Cited by 776
Self-citationBreastfeeding and asthma and allergies: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Lodge, C., Tan, D., Lau, M., Dai, X., Tham, R., Lowe, A., Bowatte, G., Allen, K., & Dharmage, S. (2015) · Acta Paediatrica · doi:10.1111/apa.13132 · Cited by 581
Cited by
Daily emollient during infancy for prevention of eczema: the BEEP randomised controlled trial
Chalmers, J. R., Haines, R. H., Bradshaw, L. E., Montgomery, A. A., Thomas, K. S., Brown, S. J., Ridd, M. J., Lawton, S., Simpson, E. L., Cork, M. J., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32984-8 · Cited by 317
Self-citationFood Allergy and Intolerance: A Narrative Review on Nutritional Concerns
Gargano, D., Appanna, R., Santonicola, A., De Bartolomeis, F., Stellato, C., Cianferoni, A., Casolaro, V., & Iovino, P. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13051638 · Cited by 169
Pellonperä, O., Mokkala, K., Houttu, N., Vahlberg, T., Koivuniemi, E., Tertti, K., Rönnemaa, T., & Laitinen, K. (2019) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc18-2591 · Cited by 145
Abdollahi, S., Soltani, S., de Souza, R. J., Forbes, S. C., Toupchian, O., & Salehi-Abargouei, A. (2021) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.1093/advances/nmaa156 · Cited by 91
Huang, J., Zheng, W.-H., Huang, H.-C., Ran, Y.-G., Liu, Y., & Huang, P. (2023) · Atmospheric Pollution Research · doi:10.1016/j.apr.2023.101804 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Garcia-Larsen, V., Ierodiakonou, D., Jarrold, K., Cunha, S., Chivinge, J., Robinson, Z., Geoghegan, N., Ruparelia, A., Devani, P., Trivella, M., Leonardi-Bee, J., & Boyle, R. J.
- Venue
- PLOS Medicine
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2018-02-28
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e1002507
- ISSN
- 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-1676
- OpenAlex
- W2790363451
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 3.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diet during pregnancy and infancy and risk of allergic or autoimmune disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002507
- The paper
- Garcia-Larsen, V., Ierodiakonou, D., Jarrold, K., Cunha, S., Chivinge, J., Robinson, Z., Geoghegan, N., Ruparelia, A., Devani, P., Trivella, M., Leonardi-Bee, J., & Boyle, R. J. (2018). Diet during pregnancy and infancy and risk of allergic or autoimmune disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002507
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.