The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Snakebite Mortality in India: A Nationally Representative Mortality Survey
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: India has long been thought to have more snakebites than any other country. However, inadequate hospital-based reporting has resulted in estimates of total annual snakebite mortality ranging widely from about 1,300 to 50,000. We calculated direct estimates of snakebite mortality from a national mortality survey. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a nationally representative study of 123,000 deaths from 6,671 randomly selected areas in 2001-03. Full-time, non-medical field workers interviewed living respondents about all deaths. The underlying causes were independently coded by two of 130 trained physicians. Discrepancies were resolved by anonymous reconciliation or, failing that, by adjudication. A total of 562 deaths (0.47% of total deaths) were assigned to snakebites. Snakebite deaths occurred mostly in rural areas (97%), were more common in males (59%) than females (41%), and peaked at ages 15-29 years (25%) and during the monsoon months of June to September. This proportion represents about 45,900 annual snakebite deaths nationally (99% CI 40,900 to 50,900) or an annual age-standardised rate of 4.1/100,000 (99% CI 3.6-4.5), with higher rates in rural areas (5.4/100,000; 99% CI 4.8-6.0), and with the highest state rate in Andhra Pradesh (6.2). Annual snakebite deaths were greatest in the states of Uttar Pradesh (8,700), Andhra Pradesh (5,200), and Bihar (4,500). CONCLUSIONS: Snakebite remains an underestimated cause of accidental death in modern India. Because a large proportion of global totals of snakebites arise from India, global snakebite totals might also be underestimated. Community education, appropriate training of medical staff and better distribution of antivenom, especially to the 13 states with the highest prevalence, could reduce snakebite deaths in India.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gutiérrez, J. M., Calvete, J. J., Habib, A. G., Harrison, R. A., Williams, D. J., & Warrell, D. A. (2017) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.63 · Cited by 955
Self-citationThe king cobra genome reveals dynamic gene evolution and adaptation in the snake venom system
Vonk, F. J., Casewell, N. R., Henkel, C. V., Heimberg, A. M., Jansen, H. J., McCleary, R. J. R., Kerkkamp, H. M. E., Vos, R. A., Guerreiro, I., Calvete, J. J., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1314702110 · Cited by 474
Causes and Consequences of Snake Venom Variation
Casewell, N. R., Jackson, T. N. W., Laustsen, A. H., & Sunagar, K. (2020) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2020.05.006 · Cited by 396
Senji Laxme, R. R., Attarde, S., Khochare, S., Suranse, V., Martin, G., Casewell, N. R., Whitaker, R., & Sunagar, K. (2021) · PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0009150 · Cited by 101
Self-citationAleksandrowicz, L., Malhotra, V., Dikshit, R., Gupta, P. C., Kumar, R., Sheth, J., Rathi, S. K., Suraweera, W., Miasnikof, P., Jotkar, R., et al. (2014) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-12-21 · Cited by 74
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohapatra, B., Warrell, D. A., Suraweera, W., Bhatia, P., Dhingra, N., Jotkar, R. M., Rodriguez, P. S., Mishra, K., Whitaker, R., Jha, P., & Collaborators, F. T. M. D. S.
- Venue
- PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2011-04-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e1018
- ISSN
- 1935-2727 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-2735
- OpenAlex
- W2086725085
- Cited by
- 661
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Snakebite Mortality in India: A Nationally Representative Mortality Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001018
- The paper
- Mohapatra, B., Warrell, D. A., Suraweera, W., Bhatia, P., Dhingra, N., Jotkar, R. M., Rodriguez, P. S., Mishra, K., Whitaker, R., Jha, P., & Collaborators, F. T. M. D. S. (2011). Snakebite Mortality in India: A Nationally Representative Mortality Survey. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.