The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Oral Susceptibility of Singapore Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (Linnaeus) to Zika Virus
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Zika virus (ZIKV) is a little known flavivirus that caused a major outbreak in 2007, in the South-western Pacific Island of Yap. It causes dengue-like syndromes but with milder symptoms. In Africa, where it was first isolated, ZIKV is mainly transmitted by sylvatic Aedes mosquitoes. The virus has also been isolated from Ae. aegypti and it is considered to be the vector involved in the urban transmission of the virus. Transmission of the virus by an African strain of Ae. aegypti has also been demonstrated under laboratory conditions. The aim of the present study is to describe the oral susceptibility of a Singapore strain of Ae. aegypti to ZIKV, under conditions that simulate local climate. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To assess the receptivity of Singapore's Ae. aegypti to the virus, we orally exposed a local mosquito strain to a Ugandan strain of ZIKV. Upon exposure, fully engorged mosquitoes were maintained in an environmental chamber set at 29 °C and 70-75% RH. Eight mosquitoes were then sampled daily from day 1 to day 7, and subsequently on days 10 and 14 post exposure (pe). The virus titer of the midgut and salivary glands of each mosquito were determined using a tissue culture infectious dose(50) (TCID(50)) assay. High midgut infection and salivary gland dissemination rates were observed. By day 5 after the infectious blood meal, ZIKV was found in the salivary glands of more than half of the mosquitoes tested (62%); and by day 10, all mosquitoes were potentially infective. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study showed that Singapore's urban Ae. aegypti are susceptible and are potentially capable of transmitting ZIKV. The virus could be established in Singapore should it be introduced. Nevertheless, Singapore's current dengue control strategy is applicable to control ZIKV.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Musso, D., & Gubler, D. J. (2016) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00072-15 · Cited by 1,469
Biology of Zika Virus Infection in Human Skin Cells
Hamel, R., Dejarnac, O., Wichit, S., Ekchariyawat, P., Neyret, A., Luplertlop, N., Perera-Lecoin, M., Surasombatpattana, P., Talignani, L., Thomas, F., et al. (2015) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.00354-15 · Cited by 1,207
Zika Virus, French Polynesia, South Pacific, 2013
Cao-Lormeau, V.-M., Roche, C., Teissier, A., Robin, E., Berry, A.-L., Mallet, H.-P., Sall, A. A., & Musso, D. (2014) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid2006.140138 · Cited by 874
Zika Virus: New Clinical Syndromes and Its Emergence in the Western Hemisphere
Lazear, H. M., & Diamond, M. S. (2016) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.00252-16 · Cited by 455
Zika virus: history of a newly emerging arbovirus
Wikan, N., & Smith, D. R. (2016) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(16)30010-x · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, M. I., Wong, P. S. J., Ng, L. C., & Tan, C. H.
- Venue
- PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-08-28
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e1792
- ISSN
- 1935-2727 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-2735
- OpenAlex
- W2068579381
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oral Susceptibility of Singapore Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (Linnaeus) to Zika Virus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001792
- The paper
- Li, M. I., Wong, P. S. J., Ng, L. C., & Tan, C. H. (2012). Oral Susceptibility of Singapore Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (Linnaeus) to Zika Virus. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001792
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.