The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical Manifestations of Human Brucellosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The objectives of this systematic review, commissioned by WHO, were to assess the frequency and severity of clinical manifestations of human brucellosis, in view of specifying a disability weight for a DALY calculation. METHODS/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Thirty three databases were searched, with 2,385 articles published between January 1990-June 2010 identified as relating to human brucellosis. Fifty-seven studies were of sufficient quality for data extraction. Pooled proportions of cases with specific clinical manifestations were stratified by age category and sex and analysed using generalized linear mixed models. Data relating to duration of illness and risk factors were also extracted. Severe complications of brucellosis infection were not rare, with 1 case of endocarditis and 4 neurological cases per 100 patients. One in 10 men suffered from epididymo-orchitis. Debilitating conditions such as arthralgia, myalgia and back pain affected around half of the patients (65%, 47% and 45%, respectively). Given that 78% patients had fever, brucellosis poses a diagnostic challenge in malaria-endemic areas. Significant delays in appropriate diagnosis and treatment were the result of health service inadequacies and socioeconomic factors. Based on disability weights from the 2004 Global Burden of Disease Study, a disability weight of 0.150 is proposed as the first informed estimate for chronic, localised brucellosis and 0.190 for acute brucellosis. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review adds to the understanding of the global burden of brucellosis, one of the most common zoonoses worldwide. The severe, debilitating, and chronic impact of brucellosis is highlighted. Well designed epidemiological studies from regions lacking in data would allow a more complete understanding of the clinical manifestations of disease and exposure risks, and provide further evidence for policy-makers. As this is the first informed estimate of a disability weight for brucellosis, there is a need for further debate amongst brucellosis experts and a consensus to be reached.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Survey of chronic pain in Europe: Prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment
Breivik, H., Collett, B., Ventafridda, V., Cohen, R., & Gallacher, D. (2006) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009 · Cited by 5,486
Global Burden of Disease and Risk Factors
(2006) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-6262-4 · Cited by 2,605
Quantifying the burden of disease: the technical basis for disability-adjusted life years.
Murray, C. J. L. (1994) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 1,581
Franco, M. P., Mulder, M., Gilman, R. H., & Smits, H. L. (2007) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(07)70286-4 · Cited by 1,029
Brucellosis in humans and animals.
Corbel, M. J. (2006) · Cited by 866
Global Burden of Human Brucellosis: A Systematic Review of Disease Frequency
Dean, A. S., Crump, L., Greter, H., Schelling, E., & Zinsstag, J. (2012) · PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001865 · Cited by 534
Self-citationMalaria misdiagnosis: effects on the poor and vulnerable
Amexo, M., Tolhurst, R., Barnish, G., & Bates, I. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17446-1 · Cited by 465
Perspectives for the Treatment of Brucellosis in the 21st Century: The Ioannina Recommendations
Ariza, J., Bosilkovski, M., Cascio, A., Colmenero, J. D., Corbel, M. J., Falagas, M. E., Memish, Z. A., Roushan, M. R. H., Rubinstein, E., Sipsas, N. V., et al. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040317 · Cited by 459
Human health benefits from livestock vaccination for brucellosis: case study.
Roth, F. M., Zinsstag, J., Orkhon, D., et al. (2003) · PubMed · Cited by 385
Self-citationNeurobrucellosis: Clinical and Therapeutic Features
McLean, D. R., Russell, N., & Khan, M. Y. (1992) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/clind/15.4.582 · Cited by 300
Cited by
Kirk, M. D., Pires, S. M., Black, R. E., Caipo, M., Crump, J. A., Devleesschauwer, B., Döpfer, D., Fazil, A., Fischer-Walker, C. L., Hald, T., et al. (2015) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001921 · Cited by 1,625
“05%, and 40% of cases resulted in chronic infections and 10% of cases in males resulted in orchitis [14].”
Human‐to‐human transmission of Brucella – a systematic review
Tuon, F. F., Gondolfo, R. B., & Cerchiari, N. (2017) · Tropical Medicine & International Health · doi:10.1111/tmi.12856 · Cited by 177
Metadata
- Authors
- Dean, A. S., Crump, L., Greter, H., Hattendorf, J., Schelling, E., & Zinsstag, J.
- Venue
- PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-12-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e1929
- ISSN
- 1935-2727 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-2735
- OpenAlex
- W2061075150
- Cited by
- 537
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 6.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Manifestations of Human Brucellosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001929
- The paper
- Dean, A. S., Crump, L., Greter, H., Hattendorf, J., Schelling, E., & Zinsstag, J. (2012). Clinical Manifestations of Human Brucellosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001929
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.