The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neurobrucellosis: Clinical and Therapeutic Features
Abstract
Eighteen patients with neurobrucellosis are described. Eleven patients had meningitis alone or with papilledema, optic neuropathy, or radiculopathy. Four patients had meningovascular complications manifested by stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage from a presumed mycotic aneurysm. Two patients had parenchymatous dysfunction, including a child who had a cerebellar syndrome without evidence of direct infection of the central nervous system. One patient presented with polyradiculopathy. Twelve of 16 patients had pleocytosis; none had cell counts greater than 419 x 10(6)/L. Most patients had hypoglycorrhachia and elevated levels of protein in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Results of an agglutination test for Brucella in serum were positive for all patients. Six of 16 patients had positive blood cultures, and four of 14 had positive CSF cultures. Antimicrobial treatment included concurrent administration of two or more of the following drugs: streptomycin, tetracycline (or doxycycline), rifampin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Eleven patients fully recovered. Five patients were left with residual neurological deficits. Four of these patients suffered permanent hearing loss, one of whom also had significant loss of vision in one eye. One elderly senile patient with meningovascular brucellosis remained in a vegetative state despite receiving antimicrobial therapy for 6 months. One patient died due to rupture of a mycotic aneurysm within 7 days of initiation of therapy. One other patient was treated after sustaining an intracerebral hemorrhage, but this patient's condition was diagnosed only after discharge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial Meningitis: Recent Advances in Pathophysiology and Treatment
Tunkel, A. R., Wispelwey, B., & Scheld, W. M. (1990) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-112-8-610 · Cited by 172
Dexamethasone in Tuberculous Meningitis
O'Toole, R. D., THORNTON, G. F., MUKHERJEE, M. K., & NATH, R. L. (1969) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-70-1-39 · Cited by 124
Cited by
An Overview of Human Brucellosis
Young, E. J. (1995) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/clinids/21.2.283 · Cited by 854
Clinical Manifestations of Human Brucellosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Dean, A. S., Crump, L., Greter, H., Hattendorf, J., Schelling, E., & Zinsstag, J. (2012) · PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001929 · Cited by 537
Acute renal failure due to Brucella melitensis
Dagli, O., Dokur, M., Guzeldag, G., & Ozmen, Y. (2011) · The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries · doi:10.3855/jidc.1442 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- McLean, D. R., Russell, N., & Khan, M. Y.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-10-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 582-590
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2069902118
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neurobrucellosis: Clinical and Therapeutic Features. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clind/15.4.582
- The paper
- McLean, D. R., Russell, N., & Khan, M. Y. (1992). Neurobrucellosis: Clinical and Therapeutic Features. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/clind/15.4.582
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.