Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Managing the Fight against Onchocerciasis in Africa: APOC Experience

Open access
Fobi, Grace, Yameogo, Laurent, Noma, Mounkaila, Aholou, Yaovi, Koroma, Joseph B., Zouré, Honorat M., Ukety, Tony, Lusamba-Dikassa, Paul-Samson, Mwikisa, Chris, Boakye, Daniel A., Roungou, Jean-Baptist·2015·PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Abstract

Due to the socioeconomic impact of human onchocerciasis (commonly referred to as river blindness) in West Africa, the Onchocerciasis Control Programme in the Volta River Basin (OCP) was instituted [1]. This initial programme started in 1975 and covered seven West African countries: Benin, Burkina Faso, Cote d’Ivoire, Ghana, Mali, Niger, and Togo. However, later evidence indicated that endemic areas outside the initial area posed a threat to the achievement of the OCP and, hence, the Programme was extended southward and westward to include four additional countries, bringing the total number of countries covered by OCP to eleven. The formal name was then changed to the Onchocerciasis Control Programme in West Africa, retaining the acronym OCP. OCP used aerial larviciding as its principle strategy to control the vectors of human onchocerciasis, members of the Simulium damnosum complex, in the absence of a safe drug for mass treatment against the parasites [2]. Efforts to control onchocerciasis evolved in 1987 when ivermectin was donated to kill the juvenile worms that cause the various symptoms associated with the disease. As a result of the donation, OCP instituted a new strategy of chemotherapy in combination with vector control. In the 11 countries covered by OCP, this two-prong approach led to the virtual elimination of onchocerciasis as a public health problem and as an obstacle to socioeconomic development. The availability of a donated drug effective against the parasite and safe for mass drug administration, coupled with evidence that other pathological effects of onchocerciasis were equally important socioeconomic threats, led to the decision that onchocerciasis should be controlled in all endemic countries in Africa (Fig 1). Open in a separate window Fig 1 Onchocerciasis-endemic countries in Africa, showing countries covered by the OCP and initially by APOC. Map from 2010. Note that South Sudan gained independence in 2011, becoming the 20th APOC country.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003542

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Fobi, G., Yameogo, L., Noma, M., Aholou, Y., Koroma, J. B., Zouré, H. M., Ukety, T., Lusamba-Dikassa, P.-S., Mwikisa, C., Boakye, D. A., & Roungou, J.-B.
Venue
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Published
2015-05-14
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
e0003542
ISSN
  • 1935-2727 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-2735
OpenAlex
W1506862630
Cited by
182
References
0
FWCI
7.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Managing the Fight against Onchocerciasis in Africa: APOC Experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003542
The paper
Fobi, G., Yameogo, L., Noma, M., Aholou, Y., Koroma, J. B., Zouré, H. M., Ukety, T., Lusamba-Dikassa, P.-S., Mwikisa, C., Boakye, D. A., & Roungou, J.-B. (2015). Managing the Fight against Onchocerciasis in Africa: APOC Experience. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003542

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.