Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 458

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Critical Assessment of Vector Control for Dengue Prevention

Open access
Achee, Nicole L., Gould, Fred, Perkins, T. Alex, Reiner, Robert C., Morrison, Amy C., Ritchie, Scott A., Gubler, Duane J., Teyssou, Remy, Scott, Thomas W.·2015·PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Abstract

Recently, the Vaccines to Vaccinate (v2V) initiative was reconfigured into the Partnership for Dengue Control (PDC), a multi-sponsored and independent initiative. This redirection is consistent with the growing consensus among the dengue-prevention community that no single intervention will be sufficient to control dengue disease. The PDC's expectation is that when an effective dengue virus (DENV) vaccine is commercially available, the public health community will continue to rely on vector control because the two strategies complement and enhance one another. Although the concept of integrated intervention for dengue prevention is gaining increasingly broader acceptance, to date, no consensus has been reached regarding the details of how and what combination of approaches can be most effectively implemented to manage disease. To fill that gap, the PDC proposed a three step process: (1) a critical assessment of current vector control tools and those under development, (2) outlining a research agenda for determining, in a definitive way, what existing tools work best, and (3) determining how to combine the best vector control options, which have systematically been defined in this process, with DENV vaccines. To address the first step, the PDC convened a meeting of international experts during November 2013 in Washington, DC, to critically assess existing vector control interventions and tools under development. This report summarizes those deliberations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003655

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 87 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. B Guy, 2010, Development of Sanofi Pasteur tetravalent dengue vaccine, Hum Vaccines, 6, 696, 10.4161/hv.6.9.12739 · doi:10.4161/hv.6.9.12739
  2. AG Lyons, 2014, The human dengue challenge experience at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, J Infect Dis, 209549
  3. J Poo, 2011, Live-attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine in dengue-naive children, adolescents, and adults in Mexico City randomized controlled Phase 1 trial of safety and immunogenicity, Pediatr Infect Dis J, 30, E9, 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181fe05af · doi:10.1097/inf.0b013e3181fe05af
  4. J Arias, 2002, El dengue en Cuba, Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 11221
  5. JAA Gessa, 1986, Application of environmental management principles in the program for eradication of Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (Linneus, 1762) in the republic of Cuba, 1984, Bull Pan Am Health Organ, 20, 186
  6. JR Egger, 2008, Reconstructing historical changes in the force of infection of dengue fever in Singapore: Implications for surveillance and control, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 86, 187, 10.2471/BLT.07.040170 · doi:10.2471/blt.07.040170
  7. S Mayor, 2008, Who report shows progress in efforts to reduce malaria incidence, BMJ, 337, 10.1136/bmj.a1678 · doi:10.1136/bmj.a1678
  8. TR Burkot, 2002, Progress towards, and challenges for, the elimination of filariasis from Pacific-Island communities, Ann Trop Med Parasitol, 96S61
  9. IP Sunish, 2007, Vector control complements mass drug administration against bancroftian filariasis in Tirukoilur, India, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 85, 138, 10.2471/BLT.06.029389 · doi:10.2471/blt.06.029389
  10. FdM Caceres-Manrique, 2010, Efficacy of the social mobilization and the social participation in dengue control measures, Biomedica: revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud, 30, 539
  11. SP Frances, 2011, Laboratory evaluation of the response of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus uninfected and infected with dengue virus to Deet, J Med Entomol, 48, 334, 10.1603/ME10120 · doi:10.1603/me10120
  12. S Marcombe, 2011, Resistance of Aedes aegypti to insecticides in Martinique and implications for dengue vector control, Trop Med Int Health, 16, 284
  13. L Facchinelli, 2013, Field cage studies and progressive evaluation of genetically-engineered mosquitoes, PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 7, 12, 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002001 · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002001
  14. M Legros, 2013, Modeling the dynamics of a non-limited and a self-limited gene drive system in structured Aedes aegypti populations, PLoS One, 8, e83354, 10.1371/journal.pone.0083354 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083354
  15. CK Lok, 1977, An autocidal ovitrap for the control and possible eradication of Aedes aegypti, Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health, 8, 56
  16. R Barrera, 2014, Use of the CDC autocidal gravid ovitrap to control and prevent outbreaks of Aedes aegypt i (Diptera: Culicidae), J Med Entomol, 51, 145, 10.1603/ME13096 · doi:10.1603/me13096
  17. C Luz, 2007, Ovicidal activity of entomopathogenic hyphomycetes on Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) under laboratory conditions, J Med Entomol, 44, 799, 10.1093/jmedent/44.5.799 · doi:10.1093/jmedent/44.5.799
  18. H Hughes, 2013, Modelling the use of Wolbachia to control dengue fever transmission, Bull Math Biol, 75, 796, 10.1007/s11538-013-9835-4 · doi:10.1007/s11538-013-9835-4
  19. LP Rapley, 2009, The effects of sustained release metofluthrin on the biting, movement, and mortality of Aedes aegypti in a domestic setting, Am J Trop Med Hyg, 81, 94, 10.4269/ajtmh.2009.81.94 · doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2009.81.94
  20. H Kawada, 2005, Field trial on the spatial repellency of metofluthrin-impregnated plastic strips for mosquitoes in shelters without walls (beruga) in Lombok, Indonesia, J Vector Ecol, 30, 181
  21. AA Hoffmann, 2011, Successful establishment of, Nature, 476, 454
  22. BL Montgomery, 2004, Subsoil drain sumps are a key container for Aedes aegypti in Cairns, Australia, J Am Mosq Control Assoc, 20, 365

Cited by

See all 458

Metadata

Authors
Achee, N. L., Gould, F., Perkins, T. A., Reiner, R. C., Morrison, A. C., Ritchie, S. A., Gubler, D. J., Teyssou, R., & Scott, T. W.
Venue
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Published
2015-05-07
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
e0003655
ISSN
  • 1935-2727 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-2735
OpenAlex
W1894874618
Cited by
458
References
87
FWCI
44.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Critical Assessment of Vector Control for Dengue Prevention. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003655
The paper
Achee, N. L., Gould, F., Perkins, T. A., Reiner, R. C., Morrison, A. C., Ritchie, S. A., Gubler, D. J., Teyssou, R., & Scott, T. W. (2015). A Critical Assessment of Vector Control for Dengue Prevention. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003655

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.