Cited by 93Computational Drug Discovery MethodsTrypanosoma species research and implicationsSynthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds

Machine Learning Models and Pathway Genome Data Base for Trypanosoma cruzi Drug Discovery

Open access
Ekins, Sean, Lage de Siqueira-Neto, Jair, McCall, Laura-Isobel, Sarker, Malabika, Yadav, Maneesh, Ponder, Elizabeth L., Kallel, E. Adam, Kellar, Danielle +5 more·2015·PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chagas disease is a neglected tropical disease (NTD) caused by the eukaryotic parasite Trypanosoma cruzi. The current clinical and preclinical pipeline for T. cruzi is extremely sparse and lacks drug target diversity. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In the present study we developed a computational approach that utilized data from several public whole-cell, phenotypic high throughput screens that have been completed for T. cruzi by the Broad Institute, including a single screen of over 300,000 molecules in the search for chemical probes as part of the NIH Molecular Libraries program. We have also compiled and curated relevant biological and chemical compound screening data including (i) compounds and biological activity data from the literature, (ii) high throughput screening datasets, and (iii) predicted metabolites of T. cruzi metabolic pathways. This information was used to help us identify compounds and their potential targets. We have constructed a Pathway Genome Data Base for T. cruzi. In addition, we have developed Bayesian machine learning models that were used to virtually screen libraries of compounds. Ninety-seven compounds were selected for in vitro testing, and 11 of these were found to have EC50 < 10 μM. We progressed five compounds to an in vivo mouse efficacy model of Chagas disease and validated that the machine learning model could identify in vitro active compounds not in the training set, as well as known positive controls. The antimalarial pyronaridine possessed 85.2% efficacy in the acute Chagas mouse model. We have also proposed potential targets (for future verification) for this compound based on structural similarity to known compounds with targets in T. cruzi. CONCLUSIONS/ SIGNIFICANCE: We have demonstrated how combining chemoinformatics and bioinformatics for T. cruzi drug discovery can bring interesting in vivo active molecules to light that may have been overlooked. The approach we have taken is broadly applicable to other NTDs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003878

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Access to a collection of predictive models for many of the known diseases or related targets could help find additional compounds for testing that may have previously been overlooked.

    “Access to a collection of predictive models for many of the known diseases or related targets could help find additional compounds for testing that may have previously been overlooked13.”
  • Our own recent cheminformatics prospective testing efforts have identified compounds active in vitro and in vivo against Chagas disease and the Ebola virus using Bayesian algorithms.

    “Several of our own recent cheminformatics prospective testing efforts have identified compounds active in vitro and in vivo against Chagas disease13 and the Ebola virus41 using Bayesian algorithms.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [52]Doyle M, McRae JI, Saunders EC, McConville MJ, Likic VA. Summary of Leishmania major, Strain strain Friedlin, version 18.5 2015. http://biocyc.org/LEISH/organism-summary?object=LEISH.
  2. [64]Ekins S, Bradford J, Dole K, Spektor A, Gregory K, Blondeau D, et al A Collaborative Database And Computational Models For Tuberculosis Drug Discovery. Mol BioSystems. 2010; 6: 840– 51. 20567770
  3. [72]Ekins S, Casey AC, Roberts D, Parish T, Bunin BA. Bayesian Models for Screening and TB Mobile for Target Inference with Mycobacterium tuberculosis Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2014; 94: 162– 69. 24440548 PMC4394018
  4. [73]Ekins S, Reynolds RC, Franzblau SG, Wan B, Freundlich JS, Bunin BA. Enhancing Hit Identification in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Drug Discovery Using Validated Dual-Event Bayesian Models PLOSONE. 2013; 8: e63240. PMC3647004 23667592
  5. [86]Jacoby EM, Schlichting I, Lantwin CB, Kabsch W, Krauth-Siegel RL. Crystal structure of the Trypanosoma cruzi trypanothione reductase.mepacrine complex. Proteins. 1996; 24: 73– 80. 8628734

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ekins, S., Lage de Siqueira-Neto, J., McCall, L.-I., Sarker, M., Yadav, M., Ponder, E. L., Kallel, E. A., Kellar, D., Chen, S., Arkin, M., Bunin, B. A., McKerrow, J. H., & Talcott, C.
Affiliations
  • Collaborative Drug Discovery (United States) (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • SRI International (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Ekins, Sean
Venue
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Published
2015-06-26
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
e0003878
ISSN
  • 1935-2727 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-2735
OpenAlex
W822668957
Cited by
93
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
8.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS neglected tropical diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R41AI108003, R41-AI108003-01)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Trypanosoma species research and implications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds
Keywords
Trypanosoma cruzi, Chagas disease, drug discovery, Bayesian learning, virtual screening, pathway/genome databases, high-throughput screening, chemical probes, pyronaridine, antimalarial compounds, neglected tropical diseases, drug target prediction, metabolite prediction
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Animals, Bayes Theorem, Cell Line, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Humans, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Trypanocidal Agents, Trypanosoma cruzi, Chagas Disease, Genome, Protozoan, Computational Biology, Mice, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Drug Discovery, High-Throughput Screening Assays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review