Cited by 66Animal testing and alternativesTrypanosoma species research and implicationsMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Quality of reporting and adherence to ARRIVE guidelines in animal studies for Chagas disease preclinical drug research: a systematic review

Open access
Gulin, Julián Ernesto Nicolás, Rocco, Daniela Marisa, García-Bournissen, Facundo·2015·PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Abstract

Publication of accurate and detailed descriptions of methods in research articles involving animals is essential for health scientists to accurately interpret published data, evaluate results and replicate findings. Inadequate reporting of key aspects of experimental design may reduce the impact of studies and could act as a barrier to translation of research findings. Reporting of animal use must be as comprehensive as possible in order to take advantage of every study and every animal used. Animal models are essential to understanding and assessing new chemotherapy candidates for Chagas disease pathology, a widespread parasitic disease with few treatment options currently available. A systematic review was carried out to compare ARRIVE guidelines recommendations with information provided in publications of preclinical studies for new anti-Trypanosoma cruzi compounds. A total of 83 publications were reviewed. Before ARRIVE guidelines, 69% of publications failed to report any macroenvironment information, compared to 57% after ARRIVE publication. Similar proportions were observed when evaluating reporting of microenvironmental information (56% vs. 61%). Also, before ARRIVE guidelines publication, only 13% of papers described animal gender, only 18% specified microbiological status and 13% reported randomized treatment assignment, among other essential information missing or incomplete. Unfortunately, publication of ARRIVE guidelines did not seem to enhance reporting quality, compared to papers appeared before ARRIVE publication. Our results suggest that there is a strong need for the scientific community to improve animal use description, animal models employed, transparent reporting and experiment design to facilitate its transfer and application to the affected human population. Full compliance with ARRIVE guidelines, or similar animal research reporting guidelines, would be an excellent start in this direction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004194

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [27]National Research Council. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals 8th Ed. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press; 2011.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gulin, J. E. N., Rocco, D. M., & García-Bournissen, F.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
  • Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (AR)
Corresponding author
  • Gulin, Julián Ernesto Nicolás
  • Rocco, Daniela Marisa
Venue
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Published
2015-11-20
Volume
9
Issue
11
Pages
e0004194
ISSN
  • 1935-2727 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-2735
OpenAlex
W2174176458
Cited by
66
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS neglected tropical diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Trypanosoma species research and implications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
Chagas disease, Trypanosoma cruzi, ARRIVE guidelines, animal models, translational research
MeSH terms
Animals, Antiprotozoal Agents, Disease Models, Animal, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Research Design, Chagas Disease, Guideline Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review