The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genome-wide analysis of ivermectin response by Onchocerca volvulus reveals that genetic drift and soft selective sweeps contribute to loss of drug sensitivity
Open accessAbstract
ABSTRACT Background Treatment of onchocerciasis using mass ivermectin administration has reduced morbidity and transmission throughout Africa and Central/South America. Mass drug administration is likely to exert selection pressure on parasites, and phenotypic and genetic changes in several Onchocerca volvulus populations from Cameroon and Ghana - exposed to more than a decade of regular ivermectin treatment - have raised concern that sub-optimal responses to ivermectin’s anti-fecundity effect are becoming more frequent and may spread. Methodology/Principal Findings Pooled next generation sequencing (Pool-seq) was used to characterise genetic diversity within and between 108 adult female worms differing in ivermectin treatment history and response. Genome-wide analyses revealed genetic variation that significantly differentiated good responder (GR) and sub-optimal responder (SOR) parasites. These variants were not randomly distributed but clustered in ~31 quantitative trait loci (QTLs), with little overlap in putative QTL position and gene content between countries. Published candidate ivermectin SOR genes were largely absent in these regions; QTLs differentiating GR and SOR worms were enriched for genes in molecular pathways associated with neurotransmission, development, and stress responses. Finally, single worm genotyping demonstrated that geographic isolation and genetic change over time (in the presence of drug exposure) had a significantly greater role in shaping genetic diversity than the evolution of SOR. Conclusions/Significance This study is one of the first genome-wide association analyses in a parasitic nematode, and provides insight into the genomics of ivermectin response and population structure of O. volvulus . We argue that ivermectin response is a polygenically-determined quantitative trait in which identical or related molecular pathways but not necessarily individual genes likely determine the extent of ivermectin response in different parasite populations. Furthermore, we propose that genetic drift rather than genetic selection of SOR is the underlying driver of population differentiation, which has significant implications for the emergence and potential spread of SOR within and between these parasite populations. Author summary Onchocerciasis is a human parasitic disease endemic across large areas of Sub-Saharan Africa, where more that 99% of the estimated 100 million people globally at-risk live. The microfilarial stage of Onchocerca volvulus causes pathologies ranging from mild itching to visual impairment and ultimately, irreversible blindness. Mass administration of ivermectin kills microfilariae and has an anti-fecundity effect on adult worms by temporarily inhibiting the development in utero and/or release into the skin of new microfilariae, thereby reducing morbidity and transmission. Phenotypic and genetic changes in some parasite populations that have undergone multiple ivermectin treatments in Cameroon and Ghana have raised concern that sub-optimal response to ivermectin’s anti-fecundity effect may increase in frequency, reducing the impact of ivermectin-based control measures. We used next generation sequencing of small pools of parasites to define genome-wide genetic differences between phenotypically characterised good and sub-optimal responder parasites from Cameroon and Ghana, and identified multiple genomic regions differentiating the response types. These regions were largely different between parasites from both countries but revealed common molecular pathways that might be involved in determining the extent of response to ivermectin’s anti-fecundity effect. These data reveal a more complex than previously described pattern of genetic diversity among O. volvulus populations that differ in their geography and response to ivermectin treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kofler, R., Pandey, R. V., & Schlötterer, C. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr589 · Cited by 815
Cited by
Mechanical Strain and Bone Cell Function: A Review
Ehrlich, P. J., & Lanyon, L. E. (2002) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s001980200095 · Cited by 512
Moxidectin: an oral treatment for human onchocerciasis
Milton, P., Hamley, J. I. D., Walker, M., & Basáñez, M.-G. (2020) · Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy · doi:10.1080/14787210.2020.1792772 · Cited by 211
Metadata
- Authors
- Doyle, S. R., Bourguinat, C., Nana-Djeunga, H. C., Kengne-Ouafo, J. A., Pion, S. D. S., Bopda, J., Kamgno, J., Wanji, S., Che, H., Kuesel, A. C., Walker, M., Basáñez, M.-G., Boakye, D. A., Osei-Atweneboana, M. Y., Boussinesq, M., Prichard, R. K., & Grant, W. N.
- Venue
- PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2017-07-26
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e0005816
- ISSN
- 1935-2727 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-2735
- OpenAlex
- W2951131794
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome-wide analysis of ivermectin response by Onchocerca volvulus reveals that genetic drift and soft selective sweeps contribute to loss of drug sensitivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005816
- The paper
- Doyle, S. R., Bourguinat, C., Nana-Djeunga, H. C., Kengne-Ouafo, J. A., Pion, S. D. S., Bopda, J., Kamgno, J., Wanji, S., Che, H., Kuesel, A. C., Walker, M., Basáñez, M.-G., Boakye, D. A., Osei-Atweneboana, M. Y., Boussinesq, M., Prichard, R. K., & Grant, W. N. (2017). Genome-wide analysis of ivermectin response by Onchocerca volvulus reveals that genetic drift and soft selective sweeps contribute to loss of drug sensitivity. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005816
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.