The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global expansion and redistribution of Aedes-borne virus transmission risk with climate change
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Forecasting the impacts of climate change on Aedes-borne viruses—especially dengue, chikungunya, and Zika—is a key component of public health preparedness. We apply an empirically parameterized model of viral transmission by the vectors Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus , as a function of temperature, to predict cumulative monthly global transmission risk in current climates, and compare them with projected risk in 2050 and 2080 based on general circulation models (GCMs). Our results show that if mosquito range shifts track optimal temperature ranges for transmission (21.3 – 34.0°C for Ae. aegypti; 19.9 – 29.4°C for Ae. albopictus) , we can expect poleward shifts in Aedes-borne virus distributions. However, the differing thermal niches of the two vectors produce different patterns of shifts under climate change. More severe climate change scenarios produce larger population exposures to transmission by Ae. aegypti , but not by Ae. albopictus in the most extreme cases. Climate-driven risk of transmission from both mosquitoes will increase substantially, even in the short term, for most of Europe. In contrast, significant reductions in climate suitability are expected for Ae. albopictus , most noticeably in southeast Asia and west Africa. Within the next century, nearly a billion people are threatened with new exposure to virus transmission by both Aedes spp. in the worst-case scenario. As major net losses in year-round transmission risk are predicted for Ae. albopictus , we project a global shift towards more seasonal risk across regions. Many other complicating factors (like mosquito range limits and viral evolution) exist, but overall our results indicate that while climate change will lead to increased net and new exposures to Aedes-borne viruses, the most extreme increases in Ae. albopictus transmission are predicted to occur at intermediate climate change scenarios. Author Summary The established scientific consensus indicates that climate change will severely exacerbate the risk and burden of Aedes-transmitted viruses, including dengue, chikungunya, Zika, and other significant threats to global health security. Here, we show more subtle impacts of climate change on transmission, caused primarily by differences between the more heat-tolerant Aedes aegypti and the more heat-limited Ae. albopictus. Within the next century, nearly a billion people could face their first exposure to viral transmission from either mosquito in the worst-case scenario, mainly in Europe and high-elevation tropical and subtropical regions. However, while year-round transmission potential from Ae. aegypti is likely to expand (particularly in south Asia and sub-Saharan Africa), Ae. albopictus transmission potential is likely to decline substantially in the tropics, marking a global shift towards seasonal risk as the tropics eventually become too hot for transmission by Ae. albopictus. Complete mitigation of climate change to a pre-industrial baseline may protect almost a billion people from arbovirus range expansions; however, middle-of-the-road mitigation could produce the greatest expansion in the potential for viral transmission by Ae. albopictus . In any scenario, mitigating climate change would shift the projected burden of both dengue and chikungunya (and potentially other Aedes transmitted viruses) from higher-income regions back onto the tropics, where transmission might otherwise begin to decline due to rising temperatures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The global distribution and burden of dengue
Bhatt, S., Gething, P. W., Brady, O. J., Messina, J. P., Farlow, A. W., Moyes, C. L., Drake, J. M., Brownstein, J. S., Hoen, A. G., Sankoh, O., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12060 · Cited by 10,037 · cited 3×
“Results The current predicted pattern of temperature suitability based on mean monthly temperatures (Figure 1) reproduces the known or projected distributions of Aedes-borne viruses like dengue [41], chikungunya [30], and Zika [10,43,44] well.”
Driving forces for changes in geographical distribution of Ixodes ricinus ticks in Europe
Medlock, J. M., Hansford, K. M., Bormane, A., Derdakova, M., Estrada-Peña, A., George, J.-C., Golovljova, I., Jaenson, T. G. T., Jensen, J.-K., Jensen, P. M., et al. (2013) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/1756-3305-6-1 · Cited by 1,215
Spread of The Tiger: Global Risk of Invasion by The Mosquito Aedes albopictus
Benedict, M. Q., Levine, R. S., Hawley, W. A., & Lounibos, L. P. (2007) · Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases · doi:10.1089/vbz.2006.0562 · Cited by 1,027
Optimal temperature for malaria transmission is dramatically lower than previously predicted
Mordecai, E. A., Paaijmans, K. P., Johnson, L. R., Balzer, C., Ben‐Horin, T., de Moor, E., McNally, A., Pawar, S., Ryan, S. J., Smith, T. C., et al. (2013) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12015 · Cited by 680
Self-citation
Cited by
The 2021 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: code red for a healthy future
Romanello, M., McGushin, A., Di Napoli, C., Drummond, P., Hughes, N., Jamart, L., Kennard, H., Lampard, P., Solano Rodriguez, B., Arnell, N., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01787-6 · Cited by 1,603
Thermal biology of mosquito‐borne disease
Mordecai, E. A., Caldwell, J. M., Grossman, M. K., Lippi, C. A., Johnson, L. R., Neira, M., Rohr, J. R., Ryan, S. J., Savage, V., Shocket, M. S., et al. (2019) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.13335 · Cited by 746
Self-citationA Review on Chikungunya Virus Epidemiology, Pathogenesis and Current Vaccine Development
de Lima Cavalcanti, T. Y. V., Pereira, M. R., de Paula, S. O., & Franca, R. F. D. O. (2022) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v14050969 · Cited by 259
Parker, E. R., Mo, J., & Goodman, R. S. (2022) · The Journal of Climate Change and Health · doi:10.1016/j.joclim.2022.100162 · Cited by 58
Burning embers: synthesis of the health risks of climate change
Ebi, K. L., Boyer, C., Ogden, N., Paz, S., Berry, P., Campbell-Lendrum, D., Hess, J. J., & Woodward, A. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abeadd · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Ryan, S. J., Carlson, C. J., Mordecai, E. A., & Johnson, L. R.
- Venue
- PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2019-03-28
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e0007213
- ISSN
- 1935-2727 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-2735
- OpenAlex
- W2923666109
- Cited by
- 1,114
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 71.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global expansion and redistribution of Aedes-borne virus transmission risk with climate change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007213
- The paper
- Ryan, S. J., Carlson, C. J., Mordecai, E. A., & Johnson, L. R. (2019). Global expansion and redistribution of Aedes-borne virus transmission risk with climate change. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007213
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.