The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Blueprint for a High-Performance Biomaterial: Full-Length Spider Dragline Silk Genes
Open accessAbstract
Spider dragline (major ampullate) silk outperforms virtually all other natural and manmade materials in terms of tensile strength and toughness. For this reason, the mass-production of artificial spider silks through transgenic technologies has been a major goal of biomimetics research. Although all known arthropod silk proteins are extremely large (>200 kiloDaltons), recombinant spider silks have been designed from short and incomplete cDNAs, the only available sequences. Here we describe the first full-length spider silk gene sequences and their flanking regions. These genes encode the MaSp1 and MaSp2 proteins that compose the black widow's high-performance dragline silk. Each gene includes a single enormous exon (>9000 base pairs) that translates into a highly repetitive polypeptide. Patterns of variation among sequence repeats at the amino acid and nucleotide levels indicate that the interaction of selection, intergenic recombination, and intragenic recombination governs the evolution of these highly unusual, modular proteins. Phylogenetic footprinting revealed putative regulatory elements in non-coding flanking sequences. Conservation of both upstream and downstream flanking sequences was especially striking between the two paralogous black widow major ampullate silk genes. Because these genes are co-expressed within the same silk gland, there may have been selection for similarity in regulatory regions. Our new data provide complete templates for synthesis of recombinant silk proteins that significantly improve the degree to which artificial silks mimic natural spider dragline fibers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models
Ronquist, F., & Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180 · Cited by 29,077
A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein
Kyte, J., & Doolittle, R. F. (1982) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0 · Cited by 22,843
MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution.
Posada, D., & Crandall, K. A. (1998) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817 · Cited by 19,820
PAUP^* : Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and other methods) 4.0b8
Swofford, D. L. (2001) · Cited by 12,789
(1993) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040023 · Cited by 11,229
Dating of the human–ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA.
Hasegawa, M., Kishino, H., & Yano, T.-A. (1985) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02101694 · Cited by 8,687
DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods
Rozas, J., Sánchez-DelBarrio, J. C., Messeguer, X., & Rozas, R. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg359 · Cited by 6,131
VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics
Frazer, K. A., Pachter, L., Poliakov, A., Rubin, E. M., & Dubchak, I. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh458 · Cited by 2,798
Evolution by gene duplication: An update
Zhang, J. (2003) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00033-8 · Cited by 2,201
Cited by
New Opportunities for an Ancient Material
Omenetto, F. G., & Kaplan, D. L. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1188936 · Cited by 1,457
Silk fibroin biomaterials for tissue regenerations
Kundu, B., Rajkhowa, R., Kundu, S. C., & Wang, X. (2013) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.043 · Cited by 1,391
Xia, X.-X., Qian, Z.-G., Ki, C. S., Park, Y. H., Kaplan, D. L., & Lee, S. Y. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1003366107 · Cited by 561
Uncovering the structure–function relationship in spider silk
Yarger, J. L., Cherry, B. R., & van der Vaart, A. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2018.8 · Cited by 357
Decoding the secrets of spider silk
Eisoldt, L., Smith, A., & Scheibel, T. (2011) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/s1369-7021(11)70057-8 · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Ayoub, N. A., Garb, J. E., Tinghitella, R. M., Collin, M. A., & Hayashi, C. Y.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2007-06-13
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e514
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2120250790
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 89
- FWCI
- 8.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blueprint for a High-Performance Biomaterial: Full-Length Spider Dragline Silk Genes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0000514
- The paper
- Ayoub, N. A., Garb, J. E., Tinghitella, R. M., Collin, M. A., & Hayashi, C. Y. (2007). Blueprint for a High-Performance Biomaterial: Full-Length Spider Dragline Silk Genes. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000514
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.