The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An “Electronic Fluorescent Pictograph” Browser for Exploring and Analyzing Large-Scale Biological Data Sets
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The exploration of microarray data and data from other high-throughput projects for hypothesis generation has become a vital aspect of post-genomic research. For the non-bioinformatics specialist, however, many of the currently available tools provide overwhelming amounts of data that are presented in a non-intuitive way. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In order to facilitate the interpretation and analysis of microarray data and data from other large-scale data sets, we have developed a tool, which we have dubbed the electronic Fluorescent Pictograph - or eFP - Browser, available at http://www.bar.utoronto.ca/, for exploring microarray and other data for hypothesis generation. This eFP Browser engine paints data from large-scale data sets onto pictographic representations of the experimental samples used to generate the data sets. We give examples of using the tool to present Arabidopsis gene expression data from the AtGenExpress Consortium (Arabidopsis eFP Browser), data for subcellular localization of Arabidopsis proteins (Cell eFP Browser), and mouse tissue atlas microarray data (Mouse eFP Browser). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The eFP Browser software is easily adaptable to microarray or other large-scale data sets from any organism and thus should prove useful to a wide community for visualizing and interpreting these data sets for hypothesis generation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository
Edgar, R. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/30.1.207 · Cited by 13,288
Cited by
The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues
Andrés, F., & Coupland, G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3291 · Cited by 1,538
First off the mark: early seed germination
Weitbrecht, K., Müller, K., & Leubner-Metzger, G. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/err030 · Cited by 842
Impact of stomatal density and morphology on water-use efficiency in a changing world
Bertolino, L. T., Caine, R. S., & Gray, J. E. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00225 · Cited by 706
Comparative physiology of elemental distributions in plants
Conn, S., & Gilliham, M. (2010) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcq027 · Cited by 344
Alonso-Peral, M. M., Li, J., Li, Y., Allen, R. S., Schnippenkoetter, W., Ohms, S., White, R. G., & Millar, A. A. (2010) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.110.160630 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Winter, D., Vinegar, B., Nahal, H., Ammar, R., Wilson, G. V., & Provart, N. J.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2007-08-08
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e718
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002900187
- Cited by
- 2,558
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An “Electronic Fluorescent Pictograph” Browser for Exploring and Analyzing Large-Scale Biological Data Sets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0000718
- The paper
- Winter, D., Vinegar, B., Nahal, H., Ammar, R., Wilson, G. V., & Provart, N. J. (2007). An “Electronic Fluorescent Pictograph” Browser for Exploring and Analyzing Large-Scale Biological Data Sets. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000718
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.