The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-Throughput, Kingdom-Wide Prediction and Annotation of Bacterial Non-Coding RNAs
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Diverse bacterial genomes encode numerous small non-coding RNAs (sRNAs) that regulate myriad biological processes. While bioinformatic algorithms have proven effective in identifying sRNA-encoding loci, the lack of tools and infrastructure with which to execute these computationally demanding algorithms has limited their utilization. Genome-wide predictions of sRNA-encoding genes have been conducted in less than 3% of all sequenced bacterial strains, leading to critical gaps in current annotations. The relative paucity of genome-wide sRNA prediction represents a critical gap in current annotations of bacterial genomes and has limited examination of larger issues in sRNA biology, such as sRNA evolution. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We have developed and deployed SIPHT, a high throughput computational tool that utilizes workflow management and distributed computing to effectively conduct kingdom-wide predictions and annotations of intergenic sRNA-encoding genes. Candidate sRNA-encoding loci are identified based on the presence of putative Rho-independent terminators downstream of conserved intergenic sequences, and each locus is annotated for several features, including conservation in other species, association with one of several transcription factor binding sites and homology to any of over 300 previously identified sRNAs and cis-regulatory RNA elements. Using SIPHT, we conducted searches for putative sRNA-encoding genes in all 932 bacterial replicons in the NCBI database. These searches yielded nearly 60% of previously confirmed sRNAs, hundreds of previously annotated cis-encoded regulatory RNA elements such as riboswitches, and over 45,000 novel candidate intergenic loci. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Candidate loci were identified across all branches of the bacterial evolutionary tree, suggesting a central and ubiquitous role for RNA-mediated regulation among bacterial species. Annotation of candidate loci by SIPHT provides clues into the potential biological function of thousands of previously confirmed and candidate regulatory RNAs and affords new insights into the evolution of bacterial riboregulation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Identification of novel small RNAs using comparative genomics and microarrays
Wassarman, K. M., Repoila, F., Rosenow, C., Storz, G., & Gottesman, S. (2001) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.901001 · Cited by 723
Salgado, H. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj156 · Cited by 368
Global analysis of the Bacillus subtilis Fur regulon and the iron starvation stimulon
Baichoo, N., Wang, T., Ye, R., & Helmann, J. D. (2002) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03113.x · Cited by 250
Cited by
Pegasus, a workflow management system for science automation
Deelman, E., Vahi, K., Juve, G., Rynge, M., Callaghan, S., Maechling, P. J., Mayani, R., Chen, W., Ferreira da Silva, R., Livny, M., et al. (2015) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2014.10.008 · Cited by 861
Self-citationCharacterizing and profiling scientific workflows
Juve, G., Chervenak, A., Deelman, E., Bharathi, S., Mehta, G., & Vahi, K. (2013) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2012.08.015 · Cited by 788
Weinberg, Z., Wang, J. X., Bogue, J., Yang, J., Corbino, K., Moy, R. H., & Breaker, R. R. (2010) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r31 · Cited by 354
Metadata
- Authors
- Livny, J., Teonadi, H., Livny, M., & Waldor, M. K.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2008-09-12
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e3197
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2156735965
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-Throughput, Kingdom-Wide Prediction and Annotation of Bacterial Non-Coding RNAs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0003197
- The paper
- Livny, J., Teonadi, H., Livny, M., & Waldor, M. K. (2008). High-Throughput, Kingdom-Wide Prediction and Annotation of Bacterial Non-Coding RNAs. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003197
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.