Cited by 54Characterization and Applications of Magnetic NanoparticlesAtherosclerosis and Cardiovascular DiseasesBiosensors and Analytical Detection

Monocyte Subset Dynamics in Human Atherosclerosis Can Be Profiled with Magnetic Nano-Sensors

Open access
Wildgruber, Moritz, Lee, Hakho, Chudnovskiy, Aleksey, Yoon, Tae-Jong, Etzrodt, Martin, Pittet, Mikael J., Nahrendorf, Matthias, Croce, Kevin +3 more·2009·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Monocytes are circulating macrophage and dendritic cell precursors that populate healthy and diseased tissue. In humans, monocytes consist of at least two subsets whose proportions in the blood fluctuate in response to coronary artery disease, sepsis, and viral infection. Animal studies have shown that specific shifts in the monocyte subset repertoire either exacerbate or attenuate disease, suggesting a role for monocyte subsets as biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Assays are therefore needed that can selectively and rapidly enumerate monocytes and their subsets. This study shows that two major human monocyte subsets express similar levels of the receptor for macrophage colony stimulating factor (MCSFR) but differ in their phagocytic capacity. We exploit these properties and custom-engineer magnetic nanoparticles for ex vivo sensing of monocytes and their subsets. We present a two-dimensional enumerative mathematical model that simultaneously reports number and proportion of monocyte subsets in a small volume of human blood. Using a recently described diagnostic magnetic resonance (DMR) chip with 1 microl sample size and high throughput capabilities, we then show that application of the model accurately quantifies subset fluctuations that occur in patients with atherosclerosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0005663

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The chip-based DMR system was used to quantify shifts in monocyte subtype distribution in inflammatory atherosclerosis in humans, potentially contributing to identification of patients at risk for atherosclerotic plaque rupture.

    “The chip-based DMR system was used for the quantification of shifts in monocyte subtype distribution in inflammatory atherosclerosis in humans, thereby potentially contributing to the identification of patients at risk for atherosclerotic plaque rupture [208].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wildgruber, M., Lee, H., Chudnovskiy, A., Yoon, T.-J., Etzrodt, M., Pittet, M. J., Nahrendorf, M., Croce, K., Libby, P., Weissleder, R., & Swirski, F. K.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Weissleder, Ralph
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2009-05-22
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
e5663
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163495810
Cited by
54
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (CA69246, CA86355)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (P01 A154904)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01HL080731, R01HL095629, K08HL086672, R01HL096576)
  • National Cancer Institute (P50-CA-86355, P01CA069246, P50CA086355, R24 CA69246)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB004626)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
Keywords
monocyte subsets, atherosclerosis, magnetic nanoparticles, magnetic resonance imaging, macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor, phagocytic capacity, mathematical model, biomarkers, coronary artery disease
MeSH terms
Ferric Compounds, Fluorescence, Humans, Magnetics, Models, Biological, Monocytes, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Phenotype, Staining and Labeling, Biosensing Techniques, Nanotechnology, Atherosclerosis, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review