The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantification of Food Intake in Drosophila
Open accessAbstract
Measurement of food intake in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is often necessary for studies of behaviour, nutrition and drug administration. There is no reliable and agreed method for measuring food intake of flies in undisturbed, steady state, and normal culture conditions. We report such a method, based on measurement of feeding frequency by proboscis-extension, validated by short-term measurements of food dye intake. We used the method to demonstrate that (a) female flies feed more frequently than males, (b) flies feed more often when housed in larger groups and (c) fly feeding varies at different times of the day. We also show that alterations in food intake are not induced by dietary restriction or by a null mutation of the fly insulin receptor substrate chico. In contrast, mutation of takeout increases food intake by increasing feeding frequency while mutation of ovo(D) increases food intake by increasing the volume of food consumed per proboscis-extension. This approach provides a practical and reliable method for quantification of food intake in Drosophila under normal, undisturbed culture conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The plasticity of aging: insights from long-lived mutants
Kenyon, C. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.002 · Cited by 1,338
Cited by
Mechanisms of Life Span Extension by Rapamycin in the Fruit Fly Drosophila Melanogaster
Bjedov, I., Toivonen, J. M., Kerr, F., Slack, C., Jacobson, J., Foley, A., & Partridge, L. (2010) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2009.11.010 · Cited by 1,057
Self-citationAmino-acid imbalance explains extension of lifespan by dietary restriction in Drosophila
Grandison, R. C., Piper, M. D. W., & Partridge, L. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08619 · Cited by 773
Self-citationModulation of longevity and tissue homeostasis by the Drosophila PGC-1 homolog
Rera, M., Bahadorani, S., Cho, J., Koehler, C. L., Ulgherait, M., Hur, J. H., Ansari, W. S., Lo, T., Jones, D. L., & Walker, D. W. (2011) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2011.09.013 · Cited by 472
Methods for studying metabolism in Drosophila
Tennessen, J. M., Barry, W. E., Cox, J., & Thummel, C. S. (2014) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.02.034 · Cited by 445
AMPK Modulates Tissue and Organismal Aging in a Non-Cell-Autonomous Manner
Ulgherait, M., Rana, A., Rera, M., Graniel, J., & Walker, D. W. (2014) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.006 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Wong, R., Piper, M. D. W., Wertheim, B., & Partridge, L.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2009-06-26
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e6063
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114570000
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantification of Food Intake in Drosophila. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0006063
- The paper
- Wong, R., Piper, M. D. W., Wertheim, B., & Partridge, L. (2009). Quantification of Food Intake in Drosophila. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006063
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.