The Apollo number: space suits, self-support, and the walk-run transition
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: How space suits affect the preferred walk-run transition is an open question with relevance to human biomechanics and planetary extravehicular activity. Walking and running energetics differ; in reduced gravity (<0.5 g), running, unlike on Earth, uses less energy per distance than walking. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The walk-run transition (denoted *) correlates with the Froude Number (Fr = v(2)/gL, velocity v, gravitational acceleration g, leg length L). Human unsuited Fr* is relatively constant (approximately 0.5) with gravity but increases substantially with decreasing gravity below approximately 0.4 g, rising to 0.9 in 1/6 g; space suits appear to lower Fr*. Because of pressure forces, space suits partially (1 g) or completely (lunar-g) support their own weight. We define the Apollo Number (Ap = Fr/M) as an expected invariant of locomotion under manipulations of M, the ratio of human-supported to total transported mass. We hypothesize that for lunar suited conditions Ap* but not Fr* will be near 0.9, because the Apollo Number captures the effect of space suit self-support. We used the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal and other sources to identify 38 gait events during lunar exploration for which we could determine gait type (walk/lope/run) and calculate Ap. We estimated the binary transition between walk/lope (0) and run (1), yielding Fr* (0.36+/-0.11, mean+/-95% CI) and Ap* (0.68+/-0.20). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The Apollo Number explains 60% of the difference between suited and unsuited Fr*, appears to capture in large part the effects of space suits on the walk-run transition, and provides several testable predictions for space suit locomotion and, of increasing relevance here on Earth, exoskeleton locomotion. The knowledge of how space suits affect gait transitions can be used to optimize space suits for use on the Moon and Mars.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Carr and Mcgee (2009) estimated the same increasing tendency for Froude number from audio transcripts and video clips of Lunar EVAs and from astronaut and space suit characteristics.
“For Froude number, the same increasing tendency was estimated from audio transcripts and video clips of Lunar EVA's as well as by the astronauts and space suit characteristics by Carr and Mcgee (2009).”
From Human Biomechanical and Cardiopulmonary Responses to Partial Gravity – A Systematic Review (2017) · cites this paper as Carr and Mcgee, 2009
The Methods (page unavailable) say Carr and McGee used lunar EVA audio transcripts and video clips, together with astronaut and suit characteristics, to estimate gait-event measures. The Results and Discussion (page unavailable) report higher Froude numbers for running than for walking or loping. They do not establish a general increasing trend in Froude number across lunar EVAs, so the claimed “same increasing tendency” is supported only if it refers to that gait comparison. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Independent metabolic costs of supporting body weight and accelerating body mass during walking
Grabowski, A., Farley, C. T., & Kram, R. (2005) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00734.2004 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- [1]Farley CT McMahon TA 1992 Energetics of walking and running: insights from simulated reduced-gravity experiments. Journal of Applied Physiology 73 2709 2712 1490989
- [2]Carr CE Newman DJ 2005 When is running more efficient than walking in a space suit? SAE Transactions Journal of Aerospace 114 July 2005 (paper No. 2005-2001-2970)
- [3]Carr C Newman D 2007 Space suit bioenergetics: cost of transport during walking and running. Aviation, space, and environmental medicine 78 1093 1102 18064912
- [4]Carr C Newman D 2007 Space suit bioenergetics: Framework and analysis of unsuited and suited activity. Aviation, space, and environmental medicine 78 1013 1022 18018432
- [5]Alexander RM 1989 Optimization and gaits in the locomotion of vertebrates. Physiological Reviews 69 1199 1227 2678167
- [6]Minetti AE 2001 Walking on other planets. Nature 409 467 p, 469 p 11206528
- [7]Bullimore SR Donelan JM 2007 Criteria for dynamic similarity in bouncing gaits. Journal of Theoretical Biology doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.09.038 17983630 · DOI
- [10]Griffin TM Tolani NA Kram R 1999 Walking in simulated reduced gravity: mechanical energy fluctuations and exchange. Journal of Applied Physiology 86 383 390 9887153
- [11]Kram R Domingo A Ferris DP 1997 Effect of reduced gravity on the preferred walk-run transition speed. Journal of Experimental Biology 200 821 826 9076966
- [14]Jones E 2006 Apollo Lunar Surface Journal, NASA History Website.
- [19]Minetti AE 1998 The biomechanics of skipping gaits: a third locomotion paradigm? Proceedings Biological sciences/The Royal Society 265 1227 1235 PMC1689187 9699315
- [21]Neptune RR Sasaki K 2005 Ankle plantar flexor force production is an important determinant of the preferred walk-to-run transition speed. Journal of Experimental Biology 208 799 808 15755878
- [22]Diedrich FJ Warren WH Jr 1995 Why change gaits? Dynamics of the walk-run transition. Journal of experimental psychology Human perception and performance 21 183 202 7707029
- [23]Walsh CJ Endo K Herr H 2007 A quasi-passive leg exoskeleton for load-carrying augmentation. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics: (In press)
- [24]Hesse S Schmidt H Werner C Bardeleben A 2003 Upper and lower extremity robotic devices for rehabilitation and for studying motor control. Current opinion in neurology 16 705 710 14624080
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Human Biomechanical and Cardiopulmonary Responses to Partial Gravity – A Systematic Review
Richter, C., Braunstein, B., Winnard, A., Nasser, M., & Weber, T. (2017) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2017.00583 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“Therefore, they suggest the introduction of an “Apollo number” (Froude number divided by mass) to capture the effects of spacesuit self-support (Carr and Mcgee, 2009).”
Background
- Authors
- Carr, C. E., & McGee, J.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Carr, Christopher E.
- ORCID
- Carr, Christopher E.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2009-08-12
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e6614
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2719915
- OpenAlex
- W1988536462
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
- Keywords
- space suits, walk-to-run transition, Froude number, self-support, reduced gravity, gait energetics, Apollo program
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Running, Space Flight, Walking, Space Suits
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review