Cited by 251Lower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Independent metabolic costs of supporting body weight and accelerating body mass during walking

Grabowski, Alena, Farley, Claire T., Kram, Rodger·2005·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

The metabolic cost of walking is determined by many mechanical tasks, but the individual contribution of each task remains unclear. We hypothesized that the force generated to support body weight and the work performed to redirect and accelerate body mass each individually incur a significant metabolic cost during normal walking. To test our hypothesis, we measured changes in metabolic rate in response to combinations of simulated reduced gravity and added loading. We found that reducing body weight by simulating reduced gravity modestly decreased net metabolic rate. By calculating the metabolic cost per Newton of reduced body weight, we deduced that generating force to support body weight comprises approximately 28% of the metabolic cost of normal walking. Similar to previous loading studies, we found that adding both weight and mass increased net metabolic rate in more than direct proportion to load. However, when we added mass alone by using a combination of simulated reduced gravity and added load, net metabolic rate increased about one-half as much as when we added both weight and mass. By calculating the cost per kilogram of added mass, we deduced that the work performed on the center of mass comprises approximately 45% of the metabolic cost of normal walking. Our findings support the hypothesis that force and work each incur a significant metabolic cost. Specifically, the cost of performing work to redirect and accelerate the center of mass is almost twice as great as…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/japplphysiol.00734.2004

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Teunissen et al. (2007) found extremely large effects during running while Grabowski et al. (2005) reported a small effect during walking in 0.25 g compared to 1 g.

    “Teunissen et al. (2007) found extremely large effects during running while data from Grabowski et al. (2005) reported a small effect during walking in 0.25 g compared to 1 g.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grabowski, A., Farley, C. T., & Kram, R.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2005-02
Volume
98
Issue
2
Pages
579-583
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W2017291484
Cited by
251
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r29ar044688-06)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR-44688)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
energy cost of walking, body weight support, center of mass acceleration, metabolic rate, mechanical work, force generation
MeSH terms
Acceleration, Adult, Computer Simulation, Energy Transfer, Female, Humans, Locomotion, Male, Models, Biological, Oxygen Consumption, Stress, Mechanical, Task Performance and Analysis, Weight-Bearing, Weightlessness Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review