Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 251

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Noninvasive, In Vivo Assessment of Mouse Retinal Structure Using Optical Coherence Tomography

Open access
Fischer, M. Dominik, Huber, Gesine, Beck, Susanne C., Tanimoto, Naoyuki, Muehlfriedel, Regine, Fahl, Edda, Grimm, Christian, Wenzel, Andreas, Remé, Charlotte E., van de Pavert, Serge A., Wijnholds, Jan, Pacal, Marek, Bremner, Rod, Seeliger, Mathias W.·2009·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a novel method of retinal in vivo imaging. In this study, we assessed the potential of OCT to yield histology-analogue sections in mouse models of retinal degeneration. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We achieved to adapt a commercial 3(rd) generation OCT system to obtain and quantify high-resolution morphological sections of the mouse retina which so far required in vitro histology. OCT and histology were compared in models with developmental defects, light damage, and inherited retinal degenerations. In conditional knockout mice deficient in retinal retinoblastoma protein Rb, the gradient of Cre expression from center to periphery, leading to a gradual reduction of retinal thickness, was clearly visible and well topographically quantifiable. In Nrl knockout mice, the layer involvement in the formation of rosette-like structures was similarly clear as in histology. OCT examination of focal light damage, well demarcated by the autofluorescence pattern, revealed a practically complete loss of photoreceptors with preservation of inner retinal layers, but also more subtle changes like edema formation. In Crb1 knockout mice (a model for Leber's congenital amaurosis), retinal vessels slipping through the outer nuclear layer towards the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) due to the lack of adhesion in the subapical region of the photoreceptor inner segments could be well identified. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We found that with the OCT we were able to detect and analyze a wide range of mouse retinal pathology, and the results compared well to histological sections. In addition, the technique allows to follow individual animals over time, thereby reducing the numbers of study animals needed, and to assess dynamic processes like edema formation. The results clearly indicate that OCT has the potential to revolutionize the future design of respective short- and long-term studies, as well as the preclinical assessment of therapeutic strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0007507

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 251

Metadata

Authors
Fischer, M. D., Huber, G., Beck, S. C., Tanimoto, N., Muehlfriedel, R., Fahl, E., Grimm, C., Wenzel, A., Remé, C. E., van de Pavert, S. A., Wijnholds, J., Pacal, M., Bremner, R., & Seeliger, M. W.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2009-10-19
Volume
4
Issue
10
Pages
e7507
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998183942
Cited by
251
References
3
FWCI
12.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noninvasive, In Vivo Assessment of Mouse Retinal Structure Using Optical Coherence Tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0007507
The paper
Fischer, M. D., Huber, G., Beck, S. C., Tanimoto, N., Muehlfriedel, R., Fahl, E., Grimm, C., Wenzel, A., Remé, C. E., van de Pavert, S. A., Wijnholds, J., Pacal, M., Bremner, R., & Seeliger, M. W. (2009). Noninvasive, In Vivo Assessment of Mouse Retinal Structure Using Optical Coherence Tomography. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007507

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.