The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pebble and Rock Band: Heuristic Resolution of Repeats and Scaffolding in the Velvet Short-Read de Novo Assembler
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the short length of their reads, micro-read sequencing technologies have shown their usefulness for de novo sequencing. However, especially in eukaryotic genomes, complex repeat patterns are an obstacle to large assemblies. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We present a novel heuristic algorithm, Pebble, which uses paired-end read information to resolve repeats and scaffold contigs to produce large-scale assemblies. In simulations, we can achieve weighted median scaffold lengths (N50) of above 1 Mbp in Bacteria and above 100 kbp in more complex organisms. Using real datasets we obtained a 96 kbp N50 in Pseudomonas syringae and a unique 147 kbp scaffold of a ferret BAC clone. We also present an efficient algorithm called Rock Band for the resolution of repeats in the case of mixed length assemblies, where different sequencing platforms are combined to obtain a cost-effective assembly. CONCLUSIONS: These algorithms extend the utility of short read only assemblies into large complex genomes. They have been implemented and made available within the open-source Velvet short-read de novo assembler.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The complete genome of an individual by massively parallel DNA sequencing
Wheeler, D. A., Srinivasan, M., Egholm, M., Shen, Y., Chen, L., McGuire, A., He, W., Chen, Y.-J., Makhijani, V., Roth, G. T., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06884 · Cited by 1,838
Mapping and sequencing of structural variation from eight human genomes
Kidd, J. M., Cooper, G. M., Donahue, W. F., Hayden, H. S., Sampas, N., Graves, T., Hansen, N., Teague, B., Alkan, C., Antonacci, F., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06862 · Cited by 1,119
The fragment assembly string graph
Myers, E. W. (2005) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1114 · Cited by 424
Cited by
The Long-Term Stability of the Human Gut Microbiota
Faith, J. J., Guruge, J. L., Charbonneau, M., Subramanian, S., Seedorf, H., Goodman, A. L., Clemente, J. C., Knight, R., Heath, A. C., Leibel, R. L., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1237439 · Cited by 2,058
Repetitive DNA and next-generation sequencing: computational challenges and solutions
Treangen, T. J., & Salzberg, S. L. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3117 · Cited by 1,597
Namiki, T., Hachiya, T., Tanaka, H., & Sakakibara, Y. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks678 · Cited by 668
Assembly of large genomes using second-generation sequencing
Schatz, M. C., Delcher, A. L., & Salzberg, S. L. (2010) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.101360.109 · Cited by 499
Extensive transduction of nonrepetitive DNA mediated by L1 retrotransposition in cancer genomes
Tubio, J. M. C., Li, Y., Ju, Y. S., Martincorena, I., Cooke, S. L., Tojo, M., Gundem, G., Pipinikas, C. P., Zamora, J., Raine, K., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1251343 · Cited by 412
Metadata
- Authors
- Zerbino, D. R., McEwen, G. K., Margulies, E. H., & Birney, E.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2009-12-22
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e8407
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982827785
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pebble and Rock Band: Heuristic Resolution of Repeats and Scaffolding in the Velvet Short-Read de Novo Assembler. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0008407
- The paper
- Zerbino, D. R., McEwen, G. K., Margulies, E. H., & Birney, E. (2009). Pebble and Rock Band: Heuristic Resolution of Repeats and Scaffolding in the Velvet Short-Read de Novo Assembler. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008407
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.