The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic Structure Among 50 Species of the Northeastern Pacific Rocky Intertidal Community
Open accessAbstract
Comparing many species' population genetic patterns across the same seascape can identify species with different levels of structure, and suggest hypotheses about the processes that cause such variation for species in the same ecosystem. This comparative approach helps focus on geographic barriers and selective or demographic processes that define genetic connectivity on an ecosystem scale, the understanding of which is particularly important for large-scale management efforts. Moreover, a multispecies dataset has great statistical advantages over single-species studies, lending explanatory power in an effort to uncover the mechanisms driving population structure. Here, we analyze a 50-species dataset of Pacific nearshore invertebrates with the aim of discovering the most influential structuring factors along the Pacific coast of North America. We collected cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) mtDNA data from populations of 34 species of marine invertebrates sampled coarsely at four coastal locations in California, Oregon, and Alaska, and added published data from 16 additional species. All nine species with non-pelagic development have strong genetic structure. For the 41 species with pelagic development, 13 show significant genetic differentiation, nine of which show striking FST levels of 0.1-0.6. Finer scale geographic investigations show unexpected regional patterns of genetic change near Cape Mendocino in northern California for five of the six species tested. The region between Oregon and Alaska is a second focus of intraspecific genetic change, showing differentiation in half the species tested. Across regions, strong genetic subdivision occurs more often than expected in mid-to-high intertidal species, a result that may reflect reduced gene flow due to natural selection along coastal environmental gradients. Finally, the results highlight the importance of making primary research accessible to policymakers, as unexpected barriers to marine dispersal break the coast into separate demographic zones that may require their own management plans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis
Excoffier, L., Laval, G., & Schneider, S. (2005) · Evolutionary Bioinformatics · doi:10.1177/117693430500100003 · Cited by 14,280
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution
Avise, J. C. (1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-2381-9 · Cited by 5,242
Phylogeography: the history and formation of species
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-5647 · Cited by 4,538
Defining ‘Evolutionarily Significant Units’ for conservation
Moritz, C. (1994) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(94)90057-4 · Cited by 3,348
ISOLATION BY DISTANCE IN EQUILIBRIUM AND NON-EQUILIBRIUM POPULATIONS
Slatkin, M. (1993) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01215.x · Cited by 2,588
Ecosystem-Based Fishery Management
Pikitch, E. K., Santora, C., Babcock, E. A., Bakun, A., Bonfil, R., Conover, D. O., Dayton, P., Doukakis, P., Fluharty, D., Heneman, B., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1098222 · Cited by 2,312
Genetic Divergence, Reproductive Isolation, and Marine Speciation
Palumbi, S. R. (1994) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.25.1.547 · Cited by 1,684
Self-citationSeparating the wheat from the chaff: patterns of genetic differentiation in high gene flow species
Waples, R. S. (1998) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/89.5.438 · Cited by 1,292
Dispersal, Gene Flow, and Population Structure
Bohonak, A. J. (1999) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/392950 · Cited by 1,253
Cited by
Marine connectivity: a new look at pelagic larval duration and genetic metrics of dispersal
Selkoe, K., & Toonen, R. (2011) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps09238 · Cited by 425
Comparative phylogeography of the ocean planet
Bowen, B. W., Gaither, M. R., DiBattista, J. D., Iacchei, M., Andrews, K. R., Grant, W. S., Toonen, R. J., & Briggs, J. C. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1602404113 · Cited by 285
After continents divide: comparative phylogeography of reef fishes from theRedSea andIndianOcean
DiBattista, J. D., Berumen, M. L., Gaither, M. R., Rocha, L. A., Eble, J. A., Choat, J. H., Craig, M. T., Skillings, D. J., & Bowen, B. W. (2013) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12068 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Kelly, R. P., & Palumbi, S. R.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-01-07
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e8594
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973144702
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 15.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic Structure Among 50 Species of the Northeastern Pacific Rocky Intertidal Community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0008594
- The paper
- Kelly, R. P., & Palumbi, S. R. (2010). Genetic Structure Among 50 Species of the Northeastern Pacific Rocky Intertidal Community. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008594
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.