The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drosophila Cuticular Hydrocarbons Revisited: Mating Status Alters Cuticular Profiles
Open accessAbstract
Most living organisms use pheromones for inter-individual communication. In Drosophila melanogaster flies, several pheromones perceived either by contact/at a short distance (cuticular hydrocarbons, CHs), or at a longer distance (cis-vaccenyl acetate, cVA), affect courtship and mating behaviours. However, it has not previously been possible to precisely identify all potential pheromonal compounds and simultaneously monitor their variation on a time scale. To overcome this limitation, we combined Solid Phase Micro-Extraction with gas-chromatography coupled with mass-spectrometry. This allowed us (i) to identify 59 cuticular compounds, including 17 new CHs; (ii) to precisely quantify the amount of each compound that could be detected by another fly, and (iii) to measure the variation of these substances as a function of aging and mating. Sex-specific variation appeared with age, while mating affected cuticular compounds in both sexes with three possible patterns: variation was (i) reciprocal in the two sexes, suggesting a passive mechanical transfer during mating, (ii) parallel in both sexes, such as for cVA which strikingly appeared during mating, or (iii) unilateral, presumably as a result of sexual interaction. We provide a complete reassessment of all Drosophila CHs and suggest that the chemical conversation between male and female flies is far more complex than is generally accepted. We conclude that focusing on individual compounds will not provide a satisfactory understanding of the evolution and function of chemical communication in Drosophila.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Solid phase microextraction with thermal desorption using fused silica optical fibers
Arthur, C. L., & Pawliszyn, J. (1990) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac00218a019 · Cited by 4,997
ECOLOGICAL, BEHAVIORAL, AND BIOCHEMICAL ASPECTS OF INSECT HYDROCARBONS
Howard, R. W., & Blomquist, G. J. (2005) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.50.071803.130359 · Cited by 1,239
A single class of olfactory neurons mediates behavioural responses to a Drosophila sex pheromone
Kurtovic, A., Widmer, A., & Dickson, B. J. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05672 · Cited by 761
Pheromones and animal behaviour: communication by smell and taste
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-1545 · Cited by 737
Cuticular Hydrocarbons: Their Evolution and Roles in Drosophila Pheromonal Communication
Ferveur, J.-F. (2005) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10519-005-3220-5 · Cited by 501
Self-citationCourtship Behavior in Drosophila
Spieth, H. T. (1974) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.en.19.010174.002125 · Cited by 490
A few chemical words exchanged byDrosophila during courtship and mating
Jallon, J.-M. (1984) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf01065444 · Cited by 455
CHEMICAL ECOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY OF INSECT HYDROCARBONS
Howard, R. W., & Blomquist, G. J. (1982) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.en.27.010182.001053 · Cited by 405
The Drosophila pheromone cVA activates a sexually dimorphic neural circuit
Datta, S. R., Vasconcelos, M. L., Ruta, V., Luo, S., Wong, A., Demir, E., Flores, J., Balonze, K., Dickson, B. J., & Axel, R. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06808 · Cited by 382
Pheromones and Animal Behaviour
TURNBULL, D. (2005) · Austral Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2005.01521.x · Cited by 337
Cited by
Commensal bacteria play a role in mating preference of Drosophila melanogaster
Sharon, G., Segal, D., Ringo, J. M., Hefetz, A., Zilber-Rosenberg, I., & Rosenberg, E. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1009906107 · Cited by 832
Drosophila Chemoreceptors: A Molecular Interface Between the Chemical World and the Brain
Joseph, R. M., & Carlson, J. R. (2015) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2015.09.005 · Cited by 370
Genes and circuits of courtship behaviour in Drosophila males
Yamamoto, D., & Koganezawa, M. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3567 · Cited by 358
The Drosophila IR20a Clade of Ionotropic Receptors Are Candidate Taste and Pheromone Receptors
Koh, T.-W., He, Z., Gorur-Shandilya, S., Menuz, K., Larter, N. K., Stewart, S., & Carlson, J. R. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.07.012 · Cited by 300
Pheromones mediating copulation and attraction in Drosophila
Dweck, H. K. M., Ebrahim, S. A. M., Thoma, M., Mohamed, A. A. M., Keesey, I. W., Trona, F., Lavista-Llanos, S., Svatoš, A., Sachse, S., Knaden, M., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1504527112 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Everaerts, C., Farine, J.-P., Cobb, M., & Ferveur, J.-F.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-03-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e9607
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2146744598
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 24.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drosophila Cuticular Hydrocarbons Revisited: Mating Status Alters Cuticular Profiles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0009607
- The paper
- Everaerts, C., Farine, J.-P., Cobb, M., & Ferveur, J.-F. (2010). Drosophila Cuticular Hydrocarbons Revisited: Mating Status Alters Cuticular Profiles. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009607
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.