The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bridgehead Effect in the Worldwide Invasion of the Biocontrol Harlequin Ladybird
Open accessAbstract
Recent studies of the routes of worldwide introductions of alien organisms suggest that many widespread invasions could have stemmed not from the native range, but from a particularly successful invasive population, which serves as the source of colonists for remote new territories. We call here this phenomenon the invasive bridgehead effect. Evaluating the likelihood of such a scenario is heuristically challenging. We solved this problem by using approximate Bayesian computation methods to quantitatively compare complex invasion scenarios based on the analysis of population genetics (microsatellite variation) and historical (first observation dates) data. We applied this approach to the Harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis (HA), a coccinellid native to Asia that was repeatedly introduced as a biocontrol agent without becoming established for decades. We show that the recent burst of worldwide invasions of HA followed a bridgehead scenario, in which an invasive population in eastern North America acted as the source of the colonists that invaded the European, South American and African continents, with some admixture with a biocontrol strain in Europe. This demonstration of a mechanism of invasion via a bridgehead has important implications both for invasion theory (i.e., a single evolutionary shift in the bridgehead population versus multiple changes in case of introduced populations becoming invasive independently) and for ongoing efforts to manage invasions by alien organisms (i.e., heightened vigilance against invasive bridgeheads).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reconstructing routes of invasion using genetic data: why, how and so what?
ESTOUP, A., & GUILLEMAUD, T. (2010) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2010.04773.x · Cited by 649
Self-citationInvasion Science: A Horizon Scan of Emerging Challenges and Opportunities
Ricciardi, A., Blackburn, T. M., Carlton, J. T., Dick, J. T. A., Hulme, P. E., Iacarella, J. C., Jeschke, J. M., Liebhold, A. M., Lockwood, J. L., MacIsaac, H. J., et al. (2017) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2017.03.007 · Cited by 458
The harlequin ladybird, Harmonia axyridis: global perspectives on invasion history and ecology
Roy, H. E., Brown, P. M. J., Adriaens, T., Berkvens, N., Borges, I., Clusella-Trullas, S., Comont, R. F., De Clercq, P., Eschen, R., Estoup, A., et al. (2016) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-016-1077-6 · Cited by 339
Self-citationLack of confidence in approximate Bayesian computation model choice
Robert, C. P., Cornuet, J.-M., Marin, J.-M., & Pillai, N. S. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1102900108 · Cited by 317
Self-citationCrossing Frontiers in Tackling Pathways of Biological Invasions
Essl, F., Bacher, S., Blackburn, T. M., Booy, O., Brundu, G., Brunel, S., Cardoso, A.-C., Eschen, R., Gallardo, B., Galil, B., et al. (2015) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biv082 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Lombaert, E., Guillemaud, T., Cornuet, J.-M., Malausa, T., Facon, B., & Estoup, A.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-03-17
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e9743
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091270241
- Cited by
- 483
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bridgehead Effect in the Worldwide Invasion of the Biocontrol Harlequin Ladybird. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0009743
- The paper
- Lombaert, E., Guillemaud, T., Cornuet, J.-M., Malausa, T., Facon, B., & Estoup, A. (2010). Bridgehead Effect in the Worldwide Invasion of the Biocontrol Harlequin Ladybird. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009743
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.