Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Crossing Frontiers in Tackling Pathways of Biological Invasions

Open access
Essl, Franz, Bacher, Sven, Blackburn, Tim M., Booy, Olaf, Brundu, Giuseppe, Brunel, Sarah, Cardoso, Ana-Cristina, Eschen, René, Gallardo, Belinda, Galil, Bella, García-Berthou, Emili, Genovesi, Piero, Groom, Quentin, Harrower, Colin, Hulme, Philip E., Katsanevakis, Stelios, Kenis, Marc, Kühn, Ingolf, Kumschick, Sabrina, Martinou, Angeliki F., Nentwig, Wolfgang, O'Flynn, Colette, Pagad, Shyama, Pergl, Jan, Pyšek, Petr, Rabitsch, Wolfgang, Richardson, David M., Roques, Alain, Roy, Helen E., Scalera, Riccardo, Schindler, Stefan, Seebens, Hanno, Vanderhoeven, Sonia, Vilà, Montserrat, Wilson, John R. U., Zenetos, Argyro, Jeschke, Jonathan M.·2015·BioScience

Abstract

Substantial progress has been made in understanding how pathways underlie and mediate biological invasions. However, key features of their role in invasions remain poorly understood, available knowledge is widely scattered, and major frontiers in research and management are insufficiently characterized. We review the state of the art, highlight recent advances, identify pitfalls and constraints, and discuss major challenges in four broad fields of pathway research and management: pathway classification, application of pathway information, management response, and management impact. We present approaches to describe and quantify pathway attributes (e.g., spatiotemporal changes, proxies of introduction effort, environmental and socioeconomic contexts) and how they interact with species traits and regional characteristics. We also provide recommendations for a research agenda with particular focus on emerging (or neglected) research questions and present new analytical tools in the context of pathway research and management.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/biosci/biv082

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Essl, F., Bacher, S., Blackburn, T. M., Booy, O., Brundu, G., Brunel, S., Cardoso, A.-C., Eschen, R., Gallardo, B., Galil, B., García-Berthou, E., Genovesi, P., Groom, Q., Harrower, C., Hulme, P. E., Katsanevakis, S., Kenis, M., Kühn, I., Kumschick, S., Martinou, A. F., Nentwig, W., O'Flynn, C., Pagad, S., Pergl, J., Pyšek, P., Rabitsch, W., Richardson, D. M., Roques, A., Roy, H. E., Scalera, R., Schindler, S., Seebens, H., Vanderhoeven, S., Vilà, M., Wilson, J. R. U., Zenetos, A., & Jeschke, J. M.
Venue
BioScience
Published
2015-07-11
Volume
65
Issue
8
Pages
769-782
ISSN
  • 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3244
OpenAlex
W2131960752
Cited by
264
References
61
FWCI
28.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crossing Frontiers in Tackling Pathways of Biological Invasions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/biosci/biv082
The paper
Essl, F., Bacher, S., Blackburn, T. M., Booy, O., Brundu, G., Brunel, S., Cardoso, A.-C., Eschen, R., Gallardo, B., Galil, B., García-Berthou, E., Genovesi, P., Groom, Q., Harrower, C., Hulme, P. E., Katsanevakis, S., Kenis, M., Kühn, I., Kumschick, S., . . . Jeschke, J. M. (2015). Crossing Frontiers in Tackling Pathways of Biological Invasions. BioScience. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv082

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.