The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phylogenetic Characterization of Fecal Microbial Communities of Dogs Fed Diets with or without Supplemental Dietary Fiber Using 454 Pyrosequencing
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Dogs suffer from many of the same maladies as humans that may be affected by the gut microbiome, but knowledge of the canine microbiome is incomplete. This work aimed to use 16S rDNA tag pyrosequencing to phylogenetically characterize hindgut microbiome in dogs and determine how consumption of dietary fiber affects community structure. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Six healthy adult dogs were used in a crossover design. A control diet without supplemental fiber and a beet pulp-supplemented (7.5%) diet were fed. Fecal DNA was extracted and the V3 hypervariable region of the microbial 16S rDNA gene amplified using primers suitable for 454-pyrosequencing. Microbial diversity was assessed on random 2000-sequence subsamples of individual and pooled DNA samples by diet. Our dataset comprised 77,771 reads with an average length of 141 nt. Individual samples contained approximately 129 OTU, with Fusobacteria (23-40% of reads), Firmicutes (14-28% of reads) and Bacteroidetes (31-34% of reads) being co-dominant phyla. Feeding dietary fiber generally decreased Fusobacteria and increased Firmicutes, but these changes were not equally apparent in all dogs. UniFrac analysis revealed that structure of the gut microbiome was affected by diet and Firmicutes appeared to play a strong role in by-diet clustering. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest three co-dominant bacterial phyla in the canine hindgut. Furthermore, a relatively small amount of dietary fiber changed the structure of the gut microbiome detectably. Our data are among the first to characterize the healthy canine gut microbiome using pyrosequencing and provide a basis for studies focused on devising dietary interventions for microbiome-associated diseases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput
Edgar, R. C. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh340 · Cited by 44,662
Thompson, J. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.24.4876 · Cited by 38,993
MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) Software Version 4.0
Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2007) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msm092 · Cited by 28,730
Naïve Bayesian Classifier for Rapid Assignment of rRNA Sequences into the New Bacterial Taxonomy
Wang, Q., Garrity, G. M., Tiedje, J. M., & Cole, J. R. (2007) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00062-07 · Cited by 19,885
Schloss, P. D., Westcott, S. L., Ryabin, T., Hall, J. R., Hartmann, M., Hollister, E. B., Lesniewski, R. A., Oakley, B. B., Parks, D. H., Robinson, C. J., et al. (2009) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01541-09 · Cited by 19,549
PHYLIP-Phylogeny inference package (Version 3.2)
Felsenstein, J. (1989) · Cladistics · Cited by 17,682
An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest
Turnbaugh, P. J., Ley, R. E., Mahowald, M. A., Magrini, V., Mardis, E. R., & Gordon, J. I. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05414 · Cited by 12,444
Muyzer, G., de Waal, E. C., & Uitterlinden, A. G. (1993) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.59.3.695-700.1993 · Cited by 11,429
Human gut microbes associated with obesity
Ley, R. E., Turnbaugh, P. J., Klein, S., & Gordon, J. I. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/4441022a · Cited by 8,785
UniFrac: a New Phylogenetic Method for Comparing Microbial Communities
Lozupone, C., & Knight, R. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.12.8228-8235.2005 · Cited by 8,227
Cited by
UniFrac: an effective distance metric for microbial community comparison
Lozupone, C., Lladser, M. E., Knights, D., Stombaugh, J., & Knight, R. (2011) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2010.133 · Cited by 2,825
How informative is the mouse for human gut microbiota research?
Nguyen, T. L. A., Vieira-Silva, S., Liston, A., & Raes, J. (2015) · Disease Models & Mechanisms · doi:10.1242/dmm.017400 · Cited by 1,334
“The canine gut microbiota has also been investigated in several studies, given the similarity in gut morphology and functioning to the digestive system of humans (Middelbos et al., 2010; Suchodolski et al., 2008; Suchodolski et al., 2009).”
BackgroundEnteric dysbiosis associated with a mouse model of alcoholic liver disease
Yan, A. W., Fouts, D. E., Brandl, J., Stärkel, P., Torralba, M., Schott, E., Tsukamoto, H., Nelson, K. E., Brenner, D. A., & Schnabl, B. (2011) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.24018 · Cited by 791
The Gastrointestinal Microbiome: A Review
Barko, P. C., McMichael, M. A., Swanson, K. S., & Williams, D. A. (2018) · Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/jvim.14875 · Cited by 750
Self-citationRaw meat based diet influences faecal microbiome and end products of fermentation in healthy dogs
Sandri, M., Dal Monego, S., Conte, G., Sgorlon, S., & Stefanon, B. (2016) · BMC Veterinary Research · doi:10.1186/s12917-017-0981-z · Cited by 185
Metadata
- Authors
- Middelbos, I. S., Vester Boler, B. M., Qu, A., White, B. A., Swanson, K. S., & Fahey, G. C.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-03-22
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e9768
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008586271
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 5.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogenetic Characterization of Fecal Microbial Communities of Dogs Fed Diets with or without Supplemental Dietary Fiber Using 454 Pyrosequencing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0009768
- The paper
- Middelbos, I. S., Vester Boler, B. M., Qu, A., White, B. A., Swanson, K. S., & Fahey, G. C. (2010). Phylogenetic Characterization of Fecal Microbial Communities of Dogs Fed Diets with or without Supplemental Dietary Fiber Using 454 Pyrosequencing. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009768
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.