Predictive Coding or Evidence Accumulation? False Inference and Neuronal Fluctuations
Open accessAbstract
Perceptual decisions can be made when sensory input affords an inference about what generated that input. Here, we report findings from two independent perceptual experiments conducted during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with a sparse event-related design. The first experiment, in the visual modality, involved forced-choice discrimination of coherence in random dot kinematograms that contained either subliminal or periliminal motion coherence. The second experiment, in the auditory domain, involved free response detection of (non-semantic) near-threshold acoustic stimuli. We analysed fluctuations in ongoing neural activity, as indexed by fMRI, and found that neuronal activity in sensory areas (extrastriate visual and early auditory cortex) biases perceptual decisions towards correct inference and not towards a specific percept. Hits (detection of near-threshold stimuli) were preceded by significantly higher activity than both misses of identical stimuli or false alarms, in which percepts arise in the absence of appropriate sensory input. In accord with predictive coding models and the free-energy principle, this observation suggests that cortical activity in sensory brain areas reflects the precision of prediction errors and not just the sensory evidence or prediction errors per se.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Variations in baseline activity influence subsequent perception.
“Hesselmann et al. (2010), have shown that variations in baseline activity in fl uence subsequent perception”
From Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science (2013) · cites this paper as Hesselmann et al. 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 26 · Cited by 117
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- [3]Heekeren HR Marrett S Ungerleider LG 2008 The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9 467 479 18464792
- [4]Smith PL Ratcliff R 2004 Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions. Trends in Neurosciences 27 161 168 15036882
- [5]Friston KJ 2005 A theory of cortical responses. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360 815 836 15937014 PMC1569488
- [7]Ress D Heeger DJ 2003 Neuronal correlates of perception in early visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 6 414 420 12627164 PMC2278238
- [9]Kleinschmidt A Büchel C Hutton C Friston KJ Frackowiak RS 2002 The neural structures expressing perceptual hysteresis in visual letter recognition. Neuron 34 659 666 12062048
- [10]Boly M Balteau E Schnakers C Degueldre C Moonen G 2007 Baseline brain activity fluctuations predict somatosensory perception in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104 12187 12192 17616583 PMC1924544
- [11]Hesselmann G Kell CA Eger E Kleinschmidt A 2008 Spontaneous local variations in ongoing neural activity bias perceptual decisions. PNAS 105 10984 10989 18664576 PMC2504783
- [12]Hesselmann G Kell CA Kleinschmidt A 2008 Ongoing activity fluctuations in hMT+ bias the perception of coherent visual motion. Journal of Neuroscience 28 14481 14485 19118182 PMC6671252
- [13]Sadaghiani S Hesselmann G Kleinschmidt A 2009 Distributed and antagonistic contributions of ongoing activity fluctuations to auditory stimulus detection. Journal of Neuroscience 29 13410 13417 19846728 PMC6665194
- [15]Friston K 2009 The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain? Trends Cogn Sci 13 293 301 19559644
- [16]Summerfield C Egner T Greene M Koechlin E Mangels J 2006 Predictive codes for forthcoming perception in the frontal cortex. Science 314 1311 1314 17124325
- [17]Deco G Jirsa V McIntosh AR Sporns O Koetter R 2009 Key role of coupling, delay, and noise in resting brain fluctuations. PNAS 106 10302 10307 19497858 PMC2690605
- [20]Kroener S Chandler LJ Philipps PE Seamans JK 2009 Dopamine modulates persistent synaptic activity and enhances the signal-to-noise ratio in the prefrontal cortex. PLOS One 4 e6507 19654866 PMC2715878
- [21]Kastner S Pinsk MA De Weerd P Desimone R Ungerleider LG 1999 Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation. Neuron 22 751 761 10230795
- [22]Fox MD Raichle ME 2007 Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Rev Neurosci 8 700 711 17704812
- [23]Deco G Romo R 2008 The role of fluctuations in perception. Trends in Neurosciences 31 591 598 18823666
- [24]Fox MD Snyder AZ Vincent JL Raichle ME 2007 Intrinsic fluctuations within cortical systems account for intertrial variability in human behavior. Neuron 56 171 184 17920023
- [25]Fox MD Snyder AZ Zacks JM Raichle ME 2006 Coherent spontaneous activity accounts for trial-to-trial variability in human evoked brain responses. Nature Neuroscience 9 23 25 16341210
- Authors
- Hesselmann, G., Sadaghiani, S., Friston, K. J., & Kleinschmidt, A.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kleinschmidt, Andreas
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-03-29
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e9926
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2848028
- OpenAlex
- W2128676863
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 7.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (088130)
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche
- Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Keywords
- predictive coding, evidence accumulation, perceptual decision making, free energy principle, extrastriate cortex
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Auditory Perception, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Neurological, Motion, Neurons, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Visual Fields, Visual Pathways, Visual Perception, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review