The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metagenomic Sequencing of an In Vitro-Simulated Microbial Community
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Microbial life dominates the earth, but many species are difficult or even impossible to study under laboratory conditions. Sequencing DNA directly from the environment, a technique commonly referred to as metagenomics, is an important tool for cataloging microbial life. This culture-independent approach involves collecting samples that include microbes in them, extracting DNA from the samples, and sequencing the DNA. A sample may contain many different microorganisms, macroorganisms, and even free-floating environmental DNA. A fundamental challenge in metagenomics has been estimating the abundance of organisms in a sample based on the frequency with which the organism's DNA was observed in reads generated via DNA sequencing. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We created mixtures of ten microbial species for which genome sequences are known. Each mixture contained an equal number of cells of each species. We then extracted DNA from the mixtures, sequenced the DNA, and measured the frequency with which genomic regions from each organism was observed in the sequenced DNA. We found that the observed frequency of reads mapping to each organism did not reflect the equal numbers of cells that were known to be included in each mixture. The relative organism abundances varied significantly depending on the DNA extraction and sequencing protocol utilized. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We describe a new data resource for measuring the accuracy of metagenomic binning methods, created by in vitro-simulation of a metagenomic community. Our in vitro simulation can be used to complement previous in silico benchmark studies. In constructing a synthetic community and sequencing its metagenome, we encountered several sources of observation bias that likely affect most metagenomic experiments to date and present challenges for comparative metagenomic studies. DNA preparation methods have a particularly profound effect in our study, implying that samples prepared with different protocols are not suitable for comparative metagenomics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Previous detailed investigations of specific variables in microbiome experiments such as DNA extraction method have, in common with the results we report, enriched for broad classes of Gram-negative rather than Gram-positive bacteria due to technical rather than biological variables9, 24, 27, 28.”
From Assessment of variation in microbial community amplicon sequencing by the Microbiome Quality Control (MBQC) project consortium (2017) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors
Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., & Coulson, A. R. (1977) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463 · Cited by 68,572
Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. I. Accuracy AssessmentPreprint
Ewing, B., Hillier, L., Wendl, M. C., & Green, P. (1998) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.8.3.175 · Cited by 6,993
Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. II. Error Probabilities
Ewing, B., & Green, P. (1998) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.8.3.186 · Cited by 5,439
Mauve: Multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements
Darling, A. C. E., Mau, B., Blattner, F. R., & Perna, N. T. (2004) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.2289704 · Cited by 4,949
Self-citationEnvironmental genome shotgun sequencing of the sargasso sea
Venter, J. C., Remington, K., Heidelberg, J. F., Halpern, A. L., Rusch, D., Eisen, J. A., Wu, D., Paulsen, I., Nelson, K. E., Nelson, W., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093857 · Cited by 4,376
Self-citationMEGAN analysis of metagenomic dataPreprint
Huson, D. H., Auch, A. F., Qi, J., & Schuster, S. C. (2007) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.5969107 · Cited by 3,294
Metagenomics: Application of Genomics to Uncultured Microorganisms
Handelsman, J. (2004) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.68.4.669-685.2004 · Cited by 2,528
Impact of Culture-Independent Studies on the Emerging Phylogenetic View of Bacterial Diversity
Hugenholtz, P., Goebel, B. M., & Pace, N. R. (1998) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.180.18.4765-4774.1998 · Cited by 2,429
Community structure and metabolism through reconstruction of microbial genomes from the environment
Tyson, G. W., Chapman, J., Hugenholtz, P., Allen, E. E., Ram, R. J., Richardson, P. M., Solovyev, V. V., Rubin, E. M., Rokhsar, D. S., & Banfield, J. F. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02340 · Cited by 2,417
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 246
Pazda, M., Rybicka, M., Stolte, S., Bielawski, K. P., Stepnowski, P., Kumirska, J., Wolecki, D., & Mulkiewicz, E. (2020) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules25122851 · Cited by 37
Metagenomics — A Technological Drift in Bioremediation
Devarapalli, P., & Kumavath, R. (2015) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/60749 · Cited by 35
Soil Metagenomics: Concepts and Applications
Sabale, S. N., Suryawanshi, P. P., & Krishnaraj, P. U. (2019) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.88958 · Cited by 35
Fidler, G., Szilágyi-Tolnai, E., Stágel, A., Remenyik, J., Stündl, L., Gal, F., Bíró, S., & Paholcsek, M. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-60304-y · Cited by 35
Řezáčová, V., Gryndler, M., Bukovská, P., Šmilauer, P., & Jansa, J. (2016) · Pedobiologia · doi:10.1016/j.pedobi.2016.04.002 · Cited by 35
Environmental bio-monitoring with high-throughput sequencing
Wang, J., McLenachan, P. A., Biggs, P. J., Winder, L., Schoenfeld, B. I. K., Narayan, V. V., Phiri, B. J., & Lockhart, P. J. (2013) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbt032 · Cited by 34
Bacterial Communities Vary between Sinuses in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patients
Joss, T. V., Burke, C., Hudson, B. J., Darling, A. E., Forer, M., Alber, D., Charles, I. G., & Stow, N. W. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01532 · Cited by 34
Self-citationDiversity structure of the microbial communities in the guts of four neotropical termite species
Vikram, S., Arneodo, J. D., Calcagno, J. A., Ortiz, M., Mon, M. L., Etcheverry, C., Cowan, D. A., & Talia, P. M. (2021) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.10959 · Cited by 35
Compendium of analytical methods for sampling, characterization and quantification of bioaerosols
Whitby, C. B., Ferguson, R., Colbeck, I., Dumbrell, A. J., Nasir, Z. A., Marczylo, E. L., Kinnersley, R., Douglas, P., Drew, G. H., Bhui, K. S., et al. (2022) · Advances in ecological research/Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/bs.aecr.2022.09.004 · Cited by 32
Shinde, S., Cumming, J. R., Collart, F., Noirot, P. H., & Larsen, P. E. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00348 · Cited by 30
Jiang, X., Weitz, J. S., & Dushoff, J. G. (2011) · Journal of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/s00285-011-0428-2 · Cited by 30
Clean Low-Biomass Procedures and Their Application to Ancient Ice Core Microorganisms
Zhong, Z.-P., Solonenko, N., Gazitúa, M. C., Kenny, D. V., Mosley‐Thompson, E., Rich, V. I., Etten, J. L. V., Thompson, L. G., & Sullivan, M. B. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.01094 · Cited by 30
Jönsson, V., Österlund, T., Nerman, O., & Kristiansson, E. (2016) · Journal of Computational Biology · doi:10.1089/cmb.2016.0180 · Cited by 29
Assessment of microbiota:host interactions at the vaginal mucosa interface
Pruski, P., Lewis, H., Lee, Y. S., Marchesi, J. R., Bennett, P. R., Takáts, Z., & MacIntyre, D. A. (2018) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2018.04.022 · Cited by 28
Rapid phylogenetic and functional classification of short genomic fragments with signature peptides
Berendzen, J., Bruno, W., Cohn, J. D., Hengartner, N., Kuske, C. R., McMahon, B. H., Wolinsky, M., & Xie, G. G. (2012) · BMC Research Notes · doi:10.1186/1756-0500-5-460 · Cited by 27
Gori, F., Tringe, S. G., Folino, G., van Hijum, S. A. F. T., den Camp, H. J. M. O., Jetten, M. S. M., & Marchiori, E. (2013) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-14-7 · Cited by 24
Austin, G. I., Kav, A. B., ElNaggar, S., Park, H., Biermann, J., Uhlemann, A., Pe’er, I., & Korem, T. (2025) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-025-01954-4 · Cited by 24
Saliva Microbiota Carry Caries-Specific Functional Gene Signatures
Yang, F., Ning, K., Chang, X., Yuan, X. H., Tu, Q., Yuan, T., Deng, Y., Hemme, C. L., Nostrand, J. D. V., Cui, X., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076458 · Cited by 23
van de Velde, C., Joseph, C., Biclot, A., Huys, G. R. B., Pinheiro, V. B., Bernaerts, K., Raes, J., & Faust, K. (2022) · ISME Communications · doi:10.1038/s43705-022-00123-6 · Cited by 23
Kosakyan, A., Mulot, M., Mitchell, E. A. D., & Lara, E. (2015) · European Journal of Protistology · doi:10.1016/j.ejop.2015.06.005 · Cited by 23
Lynch, S. A. (2013) · Journal of Shellfish Research · doi:10.2983/035.032.0305 · Cited by 23
Borthong, J., Omori, R., Sugimoto, C., Suthienkul, O., Nakao, R., & Ito, K. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.01272 · Cited by 22
Schmidt, A., Schneider, C., Decker, P., Hohberg, K., Römbke, J., Lehmitz, R., & Bálint, M. (2022) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.8991 · Cited by 22
Taxonomic and Metabolite Diversity of Actinomycetes Associated with Three Australian Ascidians
Buedenbender, L., Carroll, A. R., Ekins, M., & Kurtböke, D. İ. (2017) · Diversity · doi:10.3390/d9040053 · Cited by 22
Pérez‐Losada, M., Crandall, K. A., & Freishtat, R. J. (2016) · AIMS Microbiology · doi:10.3934/microbiol.2016.2.108 · Cited by 21
Kusanke, L. M., Panteleit, J., Stoll, S., Korte, E., Sünger, E., Schulz, R., & Theißinger, K. (2020) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.6540 · Cited by 21
Ballarini, A., Segata, N., Huttenhower, C., & Jousson, O. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055764 · Cited by 23
Rauer, L., Tomassi, A. D., Müller, C. L., Hülpüsch, C., Traidl‐Hoffmann, C., Reiger, M., & Neumann, A. U. (2023) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jid.2023.09.249 · Cited by 22
Symbiotic Associations in Ascidians: Relevance for Functional Innovation and Bioactive Potential
Matos, A., & Antunes, A. (2021) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md19070370 · Cited by 20
Computational integration of genomic traits into 16S rDNA microbiota sequencing studies
Keller, A., Horn, H., Förster, F., & Schultz, J. (2014) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2014.07.066 · Cited by 20
Florczyk, M., Cydzik‐Kwiatkowska, A., Ziembińska-Buczyńska, A., & Ciesielski, S. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12199797 · Cited by 18
Correction of sequence-dependent ambiguous bases (Ns) from the 454 pyrosequencing system
Shin, S., & Park, J. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku070 · Cited by 18
Evaluation of ddRADseq for reduced representation metagenome sequencing
Liu, M. Y., Worden, P. J., Monahan, L. G., DeMaere, M. Z., Burke, C., Djordjevic, S. P., Charles, I. G., & Darling, A. E. (2017) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.3837 · Cited by 17
Self-citationHandbook of plant and soil analysis for agricultural systems
Álvaro Fuentes, J., Lóczy, D., Thiele‐Bruhn, S., & Zornoza Belmonte, R. (2019) · Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena eBooks · doi:10.31428/10317/7611 · Cited by 17
Stitching gene fragments with a network matching algorithm improves gene assembly for metagenomics
Wu, Y., Rho, M., Doak, T. G., & Ye, Y. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts388 · Cited by 16
Alvarez, A., Remy, L., Allix‐Béguec, C., Ligier, C., Dupont, C., Leminor, O., Lawrence, C., Supply, P., Guillemot, D., Gaillard, J., et al. (2013) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12208 · Cited by 15
Close, D. W., Ferrara, F., Dichosa, A. E. K., Kumar, S., Daughton, A. R., Daligault, H. E., Reitenga, K. G., Velappan, N., Sanchez, T. C., Iyer, S., et al. (2013) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/1471-2180-13-270 · Cited by 15
Bonilla‐Rosso, G., Eguiarte, L. E., Romero, D., Travisano, M., & Souza, V. (2012) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01405.x · Cited by 16
Mining RNA–Seq Data for Infections and Contaminations
Bonfert, T., Csaba, G., Zimmer, R., & Friedel, C. C. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073071 · Cited by 15
Johansen, P. G., Vindeløv, J., Arneborg, N., & Brockmann, E. (2014) · Systematic and Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.syapm.2013.12.006 · Cited by 14
An Optimized Active Sampling Procedure for Aerobiological DNA Studies
Raghavendra, J. B., Mathanlal, T., Zorzano, M., & Martín‐Torres, J. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23052836 · Cited by 13
Raval, V. H., Purohit, M. K., & Singh, S. P. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1533/9781908818355.2.165 · Cited by 13
The Influence of Rickettsiologists on Post-Modern Microbiology
Georgiades, K., Merhej, V., & Raoult, D. (2011) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2011.00008 · Cited by 13
The Role of the Gut Microbiome in Hematological Cancers
Hussein, N., Rajasuriar, R., Khan, A. M., Lim, Y. A. L., & Gan, G. G. (2023) · Molecular Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-23-0080 · Cited by 12
Evaluation of short read metagenomic assembly
Charuvaka, A., & Rangwala, H. (2010) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm.2010.5706558 · Cited by 12
Conservation of Protists: The Krauthügel Pond in Austria
Cotterill, F. P. D., Augustin, H., Medicus, R., & Foissner, W. (2013) · Diversity · doi:10.3390/d5020374 · Cited by 12
Degois, J., Simon, X., Bontemps, C., Leblond, P., & Duquenne, P. (2018) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/02786826.2018.1557320 · Cited by 12
Evaluating DNA Extraction Methods for Community Profiling of Pig Hindgut Microbial Community
Lü, Y., Hugenholtz, P., & Batstone, D. J. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142720 · Cited by 13
Assembling Full-Length rRNA Genes from Short-Read Metagenomic Sequence Datasets Using EMIRGE
Miller, C. S. (2013) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407863-5.00017-4 · Cited by 11
Impact of sample processing on human airways microbial metagenomes
Wiehlmann, L., Pienkowska, K., Hedtfeld, S., Dorda, M., & Tümmler, B. (2017) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.01.001 · Cited by 11
Matsen, F. A., IV, & Evans, S. N. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/annotation/40cb3123-845a-43e7-b4c0-9fb00b6e2212 · Cited by 11
Biological Particles in the Indoor Environment
Colbeck, I., & Whitby, C. B. (2019) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · doi:10.1039/9781788016179-00127 · Cited by 10
Methods for Characterizing Microbial Communities Associated with the Human Body
Bassis, C. M., Young, V. B., & Schmidt, T. M. (2013) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118409855.ch2 · Cited by 10
Chisompola, D., Luwaya, E. L., Nzobokela, J., Mwansa, P., & Chakulya, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1717859 · Cited by 10
External and semi-internal controls for PCR amplification of homologous sequences in mixed templates
Kalle, E., Gulevich, A. A., & Rensing, C. (2013) · Journal of Microbiological Methods · doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2013.09.014 · Cited by 9
CAMAMED: a pipeline for composition-aware mapping-based analysis of metagenomic data
Norouzi‐Beirami, M. H., Marashi, S., Banaei‐Moghaddam, A. M., & Kavousi, K. (2021) · NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/nargab/lqaa107 · Cited by 10
Arya, P., & RAVINDRA, R. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-821265-3.00022-0 · Cited by 8
How Do the Players Play? A Post-Genomic Analysis Paradigm to Understand Aquatic Ecosystem Processes
Reid, T., & Bergsveinson, J. (2021) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2021.662888 · Cited by 8
Caron, K., Craw, P., Richardson, M. B., Bodrossy, L., Voelcker, N. H., Thissen, H. W., & Sutherland, T. D. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21196625 · Cited by 8
Methodology comparison of environmental sediment fungal community analysis
Li, X., Li, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Riaz, L., Wang, Q., Zeng, X., Qin, Z., Irfan, M., & Yang, Q. (2024) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2024.120260 · Cited by 7
Isolation of an Organic Solvent-Tolerant Lipolytic Enzyme from Uncultivated Microorganism
Roh, C., & Schmid, R. D. (2013) · Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s12010-013-0464-z · Cited by 7
Microbial biotechnology for sustainable biomedicine systems: Current research and future challenges
Yadav, A. N., Kour, D., Kaur, T., Devi, R., Guleria, G., Rana, K. L., Yadav, N., & Rastegari, A. A. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-820528-0.00020-x · Cited by 8
Optimization of on-bead emulsion polymerase chain reaction based on single particle analysis
Siu, R. H. P., Liu, Y., Chan, K. H. Y., Ridzewski, C., Slaughter, L. S., & Wu, A. R. (2020) · Talanta · doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121593 · Cited by 7
Illumina Sequencing Artifacts Revealed by Connectivity Analysis of Metagenomic DatasetsPreprint
Howe, A. C., Pell, J., Canino-Koning, R., Mackelprang, R., Tringe, S., Jansson, J. K., Tiedje, J. M., & Brown, C. T. (2012) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1212.0159 · Cited by 8
Ceretto, A., & Weinig, C. (2025) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1608399 · Cited by 6
Steps in Metagenomics: Let’s Avoid Garbage in and Garbage Out
Izard, J. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-410472-3.00001-4 · Cited by 7
Phylogenetic Heatmaps Highlight Composition Biases in Sequenced Reads
Choudhari, S., & Grigoriev, A. (2017) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms5010004 · Cited by 6
Prasad, A., Bhargava, H., Gupta, A., Shukla, N., Rajagopal, S. P., Gupta, S., Sharma, A., Valadi, J. K., Nigam, V. K., & Suravajhala, P. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-33-6191-1_14 · Cited by 6
Ferrugination of biocrusts grown on crushed ferricrete: Potential for slope stabilisation
Paz, A., Gagen, E. J., Levett, A., & Southam, G. (2021) · Ore Geology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2021.104239 · Cited by 6
A Log-Linear Model for Inference on Bias in Microbiome Studies
Zhao, N., & Satten, G. A. (2021) · Frontiers in probability and the statistical sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-73351-3_9 · Cited by 6
Decoding Complex Soil Microbial Communities through New Age "Omics"
Nair, G. R., & Raja, S. S. (2017) · Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology · doi:10.4172/1948-5948.1000382 · Cited by 6
Arabidopsis thaliana as Model for Studies on the Bacterial Root Microbiota
Schlaeppi, K., van Themaat, E. V. L., Bulgarelli, D., & Schulze‐Lefert, P. (2013) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118297674.ch23 · Cited by 6
Microbiome data integration via shared dictionary learning
Yuan, B., & Wang, S. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-63425-y · Cited by 7
Grinding Beads Influence Microbial DNA Extraction from Organic-Rich Sub-Seafloor Sediment
Niu, J., Chen, H., Cai, L., He, M., Zhang, R., & Wang, L. (2022) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms10122505 · Cited by 6
Metagenomics of Saline Habitats with Respect to Bacterial Phylogeny and Biocatalytic Potential
Purohit, M. K., & Singh, S. P. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2214-9_15 · Cited by 5
Gaetano, A. S., Semeraro, S., Greco, S., Greco, E., Cain, A., Perrone, M. G., Pallavicini, A., Licen, S., Fornasaro, S., & Barbieri, P. (2024) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms12050965 · Cited by 4
A practical guide on environmental genomics for prokaryotic systematics
Ernster, N. M., & Rodriguez‐R, L. M. (2025) · Systematic and Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.syapm.2025.126643 · Cited by 4
Pegoraro, N., Calado, R., Duarte, L. N., Manco, S. C., Fernandes, F. J. D., Polónia, A. R. M., Cleary, D. F. R., & Gomes, N. C. M. (2015) · Journal of Food Protection · doi:10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-14-390 · Cited by 4
Goyani, K. H., & Mukhopadhyaya, P. N. (2023) · Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews · doi:10.30574/msarr.2023.9.2.0166 · Cited by 4
Biogas Production from Lignocellulosic Materials Microbial Community Structure
Sun, L. (2015) · Cited by 4
Rott, M. (2013) · Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) · Cited by 4
MEtaGenome ANalyzer (MEGAN): Metagenomic Expert Resource
Huson, D. H. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7478-5_4 · Cited by 4
What Can We Learn about the Bias of Microbiome Studies from Analyzing Data from Mock Communities?
Li, M., Tyx, R. E., Rivera, A. J., Zhao, N., & Satten, G. A. (2022) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes13101758 · Cited by 3
Detection and diversity of pathogenic Vibrio from Fiji
Singh, R., Narayan, V. V., McLenachan, P. A., Winkworth, R. C., Mitra, S., Lockhart, P. J., Berry, L., Hatha, A. A. M., Aalbersberg, W. G. L., & Rao, D. L. (2012) · Environmental Microbiology Reports · doi:10.1111/j.1758-2229.2012.00344.x · Cited by 3
Metagenomic Approaches for Novel Active Metabolites
Viszwapriya, D., & Pandian, S. K. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3573-9_12 · Cited by 3
Computer simulations and experiments: in vivo–in vitro conditions in biochemistry
García, P. (2015) · Foundations of Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s10698-015-9215-2 · Cited by 3
Appah, J., Lynch, S. A., Lim, A., Riordan, R. O., O’Reilly, L., de Oliveira, L., & Wheeler, A. J. (2022) · Journal of Invertebrate Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.jip.2022.107782 · Cited by 3
Microbial biotechnology for wastewater treatment into circular economy
Gallo, G., Arancio, W., Palazzotto, E., Capri, F. C., & Alduina, R. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-99920-5.00003-2 · Cited by 3
Microbiome analyses of poultry feeds: Part I. Comparison of five different DNA extraction methods
Olson, E. G., Dittoe, D. K., Micciche, A. C., Stock, D. A., Rubinelli, P. M., Rothrock, M. J., & Ricke, S. C. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B · doi:10.1080/03601234.2024.2353002 · Cited by 3
Towards Development of a Disease Risk Model for Pea Root Rot Disease
Safarieskandari, S. (2019) · ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta) · doi:10.7939/r3-yzfv-6k82 · Cited by 4
Genomic GC bias correction improves species abundance estimation from metagenomic data
Holcik, L., von Haeseler, A., & Pflug, F. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-65530-4 · Cited by 2
Computational Approaches for Analyzing Ancient Genomes and Modern Metagenomes
Karls, E. (2013) · Cited by 2
A Generalized Lattice Based Probabilistic Approach for Metagenomic Clustering
Jha, M., Malhotra, R., & Acharya, R. S. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2016.2563422 · Cited by 2
Thomas, T., Gilbert, J. A., & Meyer, F. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7478-5_728 · Cited by 2
High-dimensional count and compositional data analysis in\\ microbiome studies
MingHua, D., Shun, H., & ChangJing, W. (2017) · Scientia Sinica Mathematica · doi:10.1360/n012017-00147 · Cited by 1
Ceretto, A., & Weinig, C. (2025) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1609057 · Cited by 1
Kaneva, E. M., Harizanov, R., Pavlova, M., Velcheva, D., Tsvetkova, N., Ivanova, A., Videnova, M., Borisova, R., Alexiev, I., & Dimitrova, R. (2025) · Microbiology Research · doi:10.3390/microbiolres16100215 · Cited by 1
Dynamics of Microeukaryotes and Archaea in the Mammalian Gut Microbiome
Dollive, S. (2013) · Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania) · Cited by 1
A generalized lattice model for clustering metagenomic sequences
Mukhopadhyay, M., Malhotra, R., & Acharya, R. S. (2015) · ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics (ACM-BCB) · doi:10.1145/2808719.2814843 · Cited by 1
Future Trends in Rapid Methods: Where Is the Field Moving, and What Should We Focus On?
Hoorfar, J., Christensen, B. B., Pagotto, F., Rudi, K., Bhunia, A. K., & Griffiths, M. W. (2014) · ASM Press eBooks · doi:10.1128/9781555817121.ch28 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Morgan, J. L., Darling, A. E., & Eisen, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Joint Genome Institute (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eisen, Jonathan A.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-04-16
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e10209
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2855710
- OpenAlex
- W2073909558
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 11.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (DEAC02-05CH11231, 0630765)
- U.S. Department of Energy (-AC02-05CH11231, Contract No. DE-AC02-05-CH11231, 05CH11231, No. DE-AC02-05-CH11231, DE AC02 05CH11231, DE-AC02-)
- Joint Genome Institute (AC02-05CH11231, DE–AC02–05CH11231)
- Office of Science (No. DE-AC02- 05-CH11231, DEAC02–05CH11231, AC02-05CH11231, DE-AC02, 05CH11231, Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231)
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (AC02‐05CH11231, DE-AC02-05CH11231, No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, 05CH11231)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
- Keywords
- metagenomics, synthetic microbial communities, in vitro simulation, metagenome binning, relative abundance estimation, observation bias, DNA extraction methods, sequencing protocols
- MeSH terms
- Biometry, Computer Simulation, DNA, Bacterial, Genome, Bacterial, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Metagenomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review