Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 490

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevention of Catheter-Related Bacteremia with a Daily Ethanol Lock in Patients with Tunnelled Catheters: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Open access
Slobbe, Lennert, Doorduijn, Jeanette K., Lugtenburg, Pieternella J., el Barzouhi, Abdelilah, Boersma, Eric, van Leeuwen, Willem B., Rijnders, Bart J. A.·2010·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) results in significant attributable morbidity and mortality. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we studied the efficacy and safety of a daily ethanol lock for the prevention of CRBSI in patients with a tunnelled central venous catheter (CVC). METHODOLOGY: From 2005 through 2008, each lumen of the CVC of adult hematology patients was locked for 15 minutes per day with either 70%-ethanol or placebo, where after the lock solution was flushed through. As a primary endpoint, the incidence rates of endoluminal CRBSI were compared. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The intent-to-treat analysis was based on 376 patients, accounting for 448 CVCs and 27,745 catheter days. For ethanol locks, the incidence of endoluminal CRBSI per 1000 CVC-days was 0.70 (95%-CI, 0.4-1.3), compared to 1.19 (95% confidence interval, 0.7-1.9) for placebo (incidence rate-ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-1.30; P = .19). For endoluminal CRBSI according to the strictest definition (positive hub culture and identical bacterial strain in blood), a 3.6-fold, non-significant, reduction was observed for patients receiving ethanol (2 of 226 versus 7 of 222; P = .103). No life-threatening adverse events were observed. More patients receiving ethanol discontinued lock-therapy (11 of 226 versus 1 of 222; P = .006) or continued with decreased lock-frequency (10 of 226 versus 0 of 222; P = .002), due to non-severe adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the reduction in the incidence of endoluminal CRBSI using preventive ethanol locks was non-significant, although the low incidence of endoluminal CRBSI precludes definite conclusions. Therefore, the lack of statistical significance may partially reflect a lack of power. Significantly more patients treated with ethanol locks discontinued their prophylactic treatment due to adverse effects, which were non-severe but reasonably ethanol related. Additional studies should be performed in populations with higher incidence of (endoluminal) CRBSI. Alternative sources of bacteremia, like exoluminal CRBSI or microbial translocation during chemotherapy-induced mucositis may have been more important in our patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00122642.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0010840

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. C Dannenberg, 2003, Ethanol-lock technique in the treatment of bloodstream infections in pediatric oncology patients with broviac catheter., J Pediatr Hematol Oncol, 25, 616, 10.1097/00043426-200308000-00006 · doi:10.1097/00043426-200308000-00006
  2. SC Metcalf, 2004, Use of ethanol locks to prevent recurrent central line sepsis., J Infect, 49, 20, 10.1016/j.jinf.2003.08.010 · DOI
  3. E Mouw, 2008, Use of an ethanol lock to prevent catheter-related infections in children with short bowel syndrome., J Pediatr Surg, 43, 1025, 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.02.026 · doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.02.026
  4. JL Nouwen, 1999, Hickman catheter-related infections in neutropenic patients: insertion in the operating theater versus insertion in the radiology suite., J Clin Oncol, 17, 1304, 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.4.1304 · doi:10.1200/jco.1999.17.4.1304
  5. J Laird, 2005, Complications of the ethanol-lock technique in the treatment of central venous catheter sepsis., J Infect, 51, 338, 10.1016/j.jinf.2005.02.009 · doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2005.02.009
  6. GJ McHugh, 1997, Polyurethane central venous catheters, hydrochloric acid and 70% ethanol: a safety evaluation., Anaesth Intensive Care, 25, 350, 10.1177/0310057X9702500404 · doi:10.1177/0310057x9702500404
  7. M Maiefski, 2009, Ethanol lock technique: review of the literature., Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 30, 1096, 10.1086/606162 · doi:10.1086/606162
  8. SF Costa, 2006, Colonization and molecular epidemiology of coagulase-negative Staphylococcal bacteremia in cancer patients: a pilot study., Am J Infect Control, 34, 36, 10.1016/j.ajic.2005.10.007 · doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2005.10.007

Cited by

See all 490

Metadata

Authors
Slobbe, L., Doorduijn, J. K., Lugtenburg, P. J., el Barzouhi, A., Boersma, E., van Leeuwen, W. B., & Rijnders, B. J. A.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2010-05-26
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
e10840
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171233023
Cited by
490
References
30
FWCI
39.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevention of Catheter-Related Bacteremia with a Daily Ethanol Lock in Patients with Tunnelled Catheters: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0010840
The paper
Slobbe, L., Doorduijn, J. K., Lugtenburg, P. J., el Barzouhi, A., Boersma, E., van Leeuwen, W. B., & Rijnders, B. J. A. (2010). Prevention of Catheter-Related Bacteremia with a Daily Ethanol Lock in Patients with Tunnelled Catheters: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010840

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.