Cited by 168Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity StudiesMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

Unlocking short read sequencing for metagenomics

Open access
Rodrigue, Sébastien, Materna, Arne C., Timberlake, Sonia C., Blackburn, Matthew C., Malmstrom, Rex R., Alm, Eric J., Chisholm, Sallie W.·2010·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Different high-throughput nucleic acid sequencing platforms are currently available but a trade-off currently exists between the cost and number of reads that can be generated versus the read length that can be achieved. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We describe an experimental and computational pipeline yielding millions of reads that can exceed 200 bp with quality scores approaching that of traditional Sanger sequencing. The method combines an automatable gel-less library construction step with paired-end sequencing on a short-read instrument. With appropriately sized library inserts, mate-pair sequences can overlap, and we describe the SHERA software package that joins them to form a longer composite read. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This strategy is broadly applicable to sequencing applications that benefit from low-cost high-throughput sequencing, but require longer read lengths. We demonstrate that our approach enables metagenomic analyses using the Illumina Genome Analyzer, with low error rates, and at a fraction of the cost of pyrosequencing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0011840

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Shera merges reads by maximizing the number of matches between the paired-end reads.

    “Shera merges the reads by maximizing the number of matches between the paired-end reads.”

    From PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina Paired-End reAd mergeR (2014) · cites this paper as Rodrigue et al., 2010

  • Both Shera and FLASH ignore the quality scores of the base calls.

    “Both, Shera and FLASH (see later in the text) ignore the quality scores of the base calls.”

    From PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina Paired-End reAd mergeR (2014) · cites this paper as Rodrigue et al., 2010

  • Shera merges all reads and leaves it to the user to decide which merged reads are correct.

    “Shera merges all reads and leaves it to the user to decide which merged reads are correct.”

    From PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina Paired-End reAd mergeR (2014) · cites this paper as Rodrigue et al., 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodrigue, S., Materna, A. C., Timberlake, S. C., Blackburn, M. C., Malmstrom, R. R., Alm, E. J., & Chisholm, S. W.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
  • Alm, Eric J.
  • Chisholm, Sallie W.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2010-07-28
Volume
5
Issue
7
Pages
e11840
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151671981
Cited by
168
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 16
FWCI
7.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DEFG0207ER64506)
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  • Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
metagenomics, short-read sequencing, long-read sequencing, paired-end sequencing, sequencing cost, read length
MeSH terms
Software, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Metagenomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review