The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tuberculosis Management by Private Practitioners in Mumbai, India: Has Anything Changed in Two Decades?
Open accessAbstract
SETTING: Mumbai, India. A study conducted in Mumbai two decades ago revealed the extent of inappropriate tuberculosis (TB) management practices of private practitioners. Over the years, India's national TB programme has made significant progress in TB control. Efforts to engage private practitioners have also been made with several successful documented public-private mix initiatives in place. OBJECTIVE: To study prescribing practices of private practitioners in the treatment of tuberculosis, two decades after a similar study conducted in the same geographical area revealed dismal results. METHODS: Survey questionnaire administered to practicing general practitioners attending a continuing medical education programme. RESULTS: The participating practitioners had never been approached or oriented by the local TB programme. Only 6 of the 106 respondents wrote a prescription with a correct drug regimen. 106 doctors prescribed 63 different drug regimens. There was tendency to over treat with more drugs for longer durations. Only 3 of the 106 respondents could write an appropriate prescription for treatment of multidrug-resistant TB. CONCLUSIONS: With a vast majority of private practitioners unable to provide a correct prescription for treating TB and not approached by the national TB programme, little seems to have changed over the years. Strategies to control TB through public sector health services will have little impact if inappropriate management of TB patients in private clinics continues unabated. Large scale implementation of public-private mix approaches should be a top priority for the programme. Ignoring the private sector could worsen the epidemic of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant forms of TB.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Basu, S., Andrews, J., Kishore, S., Panjabi, R., & Stuckler, D. (2012) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001244 · Cited by 845
Ford, C. B., Shah, R. R., Maeda, M. K., Gagneux, S., Murray, M. B., Cohen, T., Johnston, J. C., Gardy, J., Lipsitch, M., & Fortune, S. M. (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2656 · Cited by 457
Scaling up interventions to achieve global tuberculosis control: progress and new developments
Raviglione, M., Marais, B., Floyd, K., Lönnroth, K., Getahun, H., Migliori, G. B., Harries, A. D., Nunn, P., Lienhardt, C., Graham, S., et al. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60727-2 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Udwadia, Z. F., Pinto, L. M., & Uplekar, M. W.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-08-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e12023
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976442890
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tuberculosis Management by Private Practitioners in Mumbai, India: Has Anything Changed in Two Decades? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0012023
- The paper
- Udwadia, Z. F., Pinto, L. M., & Uplekar, M. W. (2010). Tuberculosis Management by Private Practitioners in Mumbai, India: Has Anything Changed in Two Decades? PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.