Cited by 457Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyEvolution and Genetic DynamicsInfectious Diseases and Tuberculosis

Mycobacterium tuberculosis mutation rate estimates from different lineages predict substantial differences in the emergence of drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Open access
Ford, Christopher B, Shah, Rupal R, Maeda, Midori Kato, Gagneux, Sebastien, Murray, Megan B, Cohen, Ted, Johnston, James C, Gardy, Jennifer +2 more·2013·Nature Genetics

Abstract

A key question in tuberculosis control is why some strains of M. tuberculosis are preferentially associated with resistance to multiple drugs. We demonstrate that M. tuberculosis strains from lineage 2 (East Asian lineage and Beijing sublineage) acquire drug resistances in vitro more rapidly than M. tuberculosis strains from lineage 4 (Euro-American lineage) and that this higher rate can be attributed to a higher mutation rate. Moreover, the in vitro mutation rate correlates well with the bacterial mutation rate in humans as determined by whole-genome sequencing of clinical isolates. Finally, using a stochastic mathematical model, we demonstrate that the observed differences in mutation rate predict a substantially higher probability that patients infected with a drug-susceptible lineage 2 strain will harbor multidrug-resistant bacteria at the time of diagnosis. These data suggest that interventions to prevent the emergence of drug-resistant tuberculosis should target bacterial as well as treatment-related risk factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.2656

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the author's own simulation exploration of the mutant distribution used by Lang and Murray (2008) and by Ford et al. (2013), practical nonidentifiability was a stubborn problem.

    “In my own simulation exploration of the mutant distribution used by Lang and Murray (2008) and by Ford et al. (2013), I also found practical nonidentifiability a stubborn problem.”

    From rSalvador: An R Package for the Fluctuation Experiment (2017) · cites this paper as Ford et al. (2013)

  • The Mann-Whitney test is inappropriate for comparing mutation rates from fluctuation assay data.

    “Recent investigators turned to the Mann-Whitney test (Ford et al. 2013), which also is inappropriate.”

    From rSalvador: An R Package for the Fluctuation Experiment (2017) · cites this paper as Ford et al. 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ford, C. B., Shah, R. R., Maeda, M. K., Gagneux, S., Murray, M. B., Cohen, T., Johnston, J. C., Gardy, J., Lipsitch, M., & Fortune, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • BC Centre for Disease Control (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Fortune, Sarah M
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2013-06-09
Volume
45
Issue
7
Pages
784-790
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2150600032
Cited by
457
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 7
FWCI
30.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health (DP2OD001378)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U54GM088558)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19AI076217, T32AI007638)
  • National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (DP2-0D001378)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
Keywords
Mycobacterium tuberculosis, drug-resistant tuberculosis, mutation rate, bacterial lineages, lineage 2, lineage 4, multidrug resistance, within-host evolution, stochastic mathematical model, clinical isolates, whole genome sequencing, tuberculosis control
MeSH terms
Antibiotics, Antitubercular, Computer Simulation, Humans, Mutation, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Prognosis, Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant, Communicable Diseases, Emerging, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial, Genetic Speciation, Biomarkers, Pharmacological, Mutation Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review