The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spermatogonial Stem Cell Niche and Spermatogonial Stem Cell Transplantation in Zebrafish
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) are the foundation of spermatogenesis, and reside within a specific microenvironment in the testes called "niche" which regulates stem cell properties, such as, self-renewal, pluripotency, quiescence and their ability to differentiate. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Here, we introduce zebrafish as a new model for the study of SSCs in vertebrates. Using 5'-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU), we identified long term BrdU-retaining germ cells, type A undifferentiated spermatogonia as putative stem cells in zebrafish testes. Similar to rodents, these cells were preferentially located near the interstitium, suggesting that the SSC niche is related to interstitial elements and might be conserved across vertebrates. This localization was also confirmed by analyzing the topographical distribution of type A undifferentiated spermatogonia in normal, vasa::egfp and fli::egfp zebrafish testes. In the latter one, the topographical arrangement suggested that the vasculature is important for the SSC niche, perhaps as a supplier of nutrients, oxygen and/or signaling molecules. We also developed an SSC transplantation technique for both male and female recipients as an assay to evaluate the presence, biological activity, and plasticity of the SSC candidates in zebrafish. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We demonstrated donor-derived spermato- and oogenesis in male and female recipients, respectively, indicating the stemness of type A undifferentiated spermatogonia and their plasticity when placed into an environment different from their original niche. Similar to other vertebrates, the transplantation efficiency was low. This might be attributed to the testicular microenvironment created after busulfan depletion in the recipients, which may have caused an imbalance between factors regulating self-renewal or differentiation of the transplanted SSCs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Braun, K. M., Niemann, C., Jensen, U. B., Sundberg, J. P., Silva-Vargas, V., & Watt, F. M. (2003) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.00703 · Cited by 425
Conboy, M. J., Karasov, A. O., & Rando, T. A. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050102 · Cited by 287 · cited 2×
“Recently, it has been demonstrated that the ‘‘immortal strand hypothesis’’ is not exclusive of self-renewing cells, but also of divisions in which daughter cells adopt divergent fates [45].”
BackgroundZou, S., Kamei, H., Modi, Z., & Duan, C. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007026 · Cited by 122
Cited by
The Sertoli cell: one hundred fifty years of beauty and plasticity
França, L. R., Hess, R. A., Dufour, J. M., Hofmann, M. C., & Griswold, M. D. (2016) · Andrology · doi:10.1111/andr.12165 · Cited by 419
Picton, H. M., Wyns, C., Anderson, R. A., Goossens, E., Jahnukainen, K., Kliesch, S., Mitchell, R. T., Pennings, G., Rives, N., Tournaye, H., et al. (2015) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dev190 · Cited by 354
Metadata
- Authors
- Nóbrega, R. H., Greebe, C. D., van de Kant, H., Bogerd, J., de França, L. R., & Schulz, R. W.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-09-20
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e12808
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008606131
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spermatogonial Stem Cell Niche and Spermatogonial Stem Cell Transplantation in Zebrafish. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0012808
- The paper
- Nóbrega, R. H., Greebe, C. D., van de Kant, H., Bogerd, J., de França, L. R., & Schulz, R. W. (2010). Spermatogonial Stem Cell Niche and Spermatogonial Stem Cell Transplantation in Zebrafish. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012808
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.